Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cavalli, Daiana [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Toia, Cássia Cestari [UNESP], Flores Orozco, Esteban Isai [UNESP], Khoury, Rayana Duarte [UNESP], Cardoso, Flávia Goulart da Rosa [UNESP], Alves, Marcelo Corrêa, Carvalho, Cláudio Antônio Talge [UNESP], Valera, Marcia Carneiro [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.032
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174734
Resumo: Introduction This clinical study was conducted to correlate the microbiological profile and levels of endotoxins found in primary endodontic infection with the presence of clinical features and to evaluate the removal of microorganisms and endotoxins using rotary, reciprocating, and hybrid systems for biomechanical preparation. Methods Thirty single root canals with primary endodontic infection were evaluated with signs and symptoms and were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the instrumentation system used (n = 10) as follows: rotary Mtwo instruments (VDW, Munich, Germany) with 8 files, the reciprocating Reciproc system (VDW) with a single file, and Genius hybrid instruments with 3 files (1 rotary and 2 reciprocating files) with irrigation using 24 mL 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. Samples were collected before (S1) and after instrumentation (S2) before being submitted to microbiological culture (colony-forming units/mL) and the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization test. Endotoxins were quantified using the limulus amebocyte lysate assay. Results Microbiological culture showed statistical differences in the reduction of colony-forming units/mL with all systems tested (P <.05), but no statistical difference was found among the groups. The most frequently detected species were Capnocytophaga ochracea (53%) and Fusobacterium nucleatum (53%) at S1 and F. nucleatum (50%) and Leptotrichia buccalis (50%) at S2. As for the reduction of endotoxins at S2, Mtwo presented the best results (95.05%) followed by the Genius (91.85%) and Reciproc (64.68%) groups, but no statistical difference was found among the groups. Previous pain, tenderness to percussion, and presence of a sinus tract were associated with specific microorganisms (P <.05). Conclusions Signs and symptoms were correlated with microorganisms. Endodontic treatment was effective in reducing bacteria and endotoxins but was not capable of completely removing them from the root canal.
id UNSP_61563d28b1a18bff0563893d9cfc6c01
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174734
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical StudyCheckerboard DNA-DNA hybridizationinstrumentationprimary endodontic infectionIntroduction This clinical study was conducted to correlate the microbiological profile and levels of endotoxins found in primary endodontic infection with the presence of clinical features and to evaluate the removal of microorganisms and endotoxins using rotary, reciprocating, and hybrid systems for biomechanical preparation. Methods Thirty single root canals with primary endodontic infection were evaluated with signs and symptoms and were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the instrumentation system used (n = 10) as follows: rotary Mtwo instruments (VDW, Munich, Germany) with 8 files, the reciprocating Reciproc system (VDW) with a single file, and Genius hybrid instruments with 3 files (1 rotary and 2 reciprocating files) with irrigation using 24 mL 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. Samples were collected before (S1) and after instrumentation (S2) before being submitted to microbiological culture (colony-forming units/mL) and the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization test. Endotoxins were quantified using the limulus amebocyte lysate assay. Results Microbiological culture showed statistical differences in the reduction of colony-forming units/mL with all systems tested (P <.05), but no statistical difference was found among the groups. The most frequently detected species were Capnocytophaga ochracea (53%) and Fusobacterium nucleatum (53%) at S1 and F. nucleatum (50%) and Leptotrichia buccalis (50%) at S2. As for the reduction of endotoxins at S2, Mtwo presented the best results (95.05%) followed by the Genius (91.85%) and Reciproc (64.68%) groups, but no statistical difference was found among the groups. Previous pain, tenderness to percussion, and presence of a sinus tract were associated with specific microorganisms (P <.05). Conclusions Signs and symptoms were correlated with microorganisms. Endodontic treatment was effective in reducing bacteria and endotoxins but was not capable of completely removing them from the root canal.Department of Restorative Dentistry Endodontic Division São Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and Technology São José dos CamposSuperior School of Agriculture “Luiz de Queiroz” Technical Section of Information Technology University of São PauloDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Endodontic Division São Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and Technology São José dos CamposUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Cavalli, Daiana [UNESP]Toia, Cássia Cestari [UNESP]Flores Orozco, Esteban Isai [UNESP]Khoury, Rayana Duarte [UNESP]Cardoso, Flávia Goulart da Rosa [UNESP]Alves, Marcelo CorrêaCarvalho, Cláudio Antônio Talge [UNESP]Valera, Marcia Carneiro [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:12:37Z2018-12-11T17:12:37Z2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1237-1245application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.032Journal of Endodontics, v. 43, n. 8, p. 1237-1245, 2017.0099-2399http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17473410.1016/j.joen.2017.03.0322-s2.0-850204143362-s2.0-85020414336.pdf93046001665831000000-0003-0987-5594Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Endodontics1,585info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-03T06:17:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174734Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-03T06:17:28Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study
title Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study
spellingShingle Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study
Cavalli, Daiana [UNESP]
Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization
instrumentation
primary endodontic infection
title_short Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study
title_full Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study
title_fullStr Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study
title_sort Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study
author Cavalli, Daiana [UNESP]
author_facet Cavalli, Daiana [UNESP]
Toia, Cássia Cestari [UNESP]
Flores Orozco, Esteban Isai [UNESP]
Khoury, Rayana Duarte [UNESP]
Cardoso, Flávia Goulart da Rosa [UNESP]
Alves, Marcelo Corrêa
Carvalho, Cláudio Antônio Talge [UNESP]
Valera, Marcia Carneiro [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Toia, Cássia Cestari [UNESP]
Flores Orozco, Esteban Isai [UNESP]
Khoury, Rayana Duarte [UNESP]
Cardoso, Flávia Goulart da Rosa [UNESP]
Alves, Marcelo Corrêa
Carvalho, Cláudio Antônio Talge [UNESP]
Valera, Marcia Carneiro [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cavalli, Daiana [UNESP]
Toia, Cássia Cestari [UNESP]
Flores Orozco, Esteban Isai [UNESP]
Khoury, Rayana Duarte [UNESP]
Cardoso, Flávia Goulart da Rosa [UNESP]
Alves, Marcelo Corrêa
Carvalho, Cláudio Antônio Talge [UNESP]
Valera, Marcia Carneiro [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization
instrumentation
primary endodontic infection
topic Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization
instrumentation
primary endodontic infection
description Introduction This clinical study was conducted to correlate the microbiological profile and levels of endotoxins found in primary endodontic infection with the presence of clinical features and to evaluate the removal of microorganisms and endotoxins using rotary, reciprocating, and hybrid systems for biomechanical preparation. Methods Thirty single root canals with primary endodontic infection were evaluated with signs and symptoms and were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the instrumentation system used (n = 10) as follows: rotary Mtwo instruments (VDW, Munich, Germany) with 8 files, the reciprocating Reciproc system (VDW) with a single file, and Genius hybrid instruments with 3 files (1 rotary and 2 reciprocating files) with irrigation using 24 mL 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. Samples were collected before (S1) and after instrumentation (S2) before being submitted to microbiological culture (colony-forming units/mL) and the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization test. Endotoxins were quantified using the limulus amebocyte lysate assay. Results Microbiological culture showed statistical differences in the reduction of colony-forming units/mL with all systems tested (P <.05), but no statistical difference was found among the groups. The most frequently detected species were Capnocytophaga ochracea (53%) and Fusobacterium nucleatum (53%) at S1 and F. nucleatum (50%) and Leptotrichia buccalis (50%) at S2. As for the reduction of endotoxins at S2, Mtwo presented the best results (95.05%) followed by the Genius (91.85%) and Reciproc (64.68%) groups, but no statistical difference was found among the groups. Previous pain, tenderness to percussion, and presence of a sinus tract were associated with specific microorganisms (P <.05). Conclusions Signs and symptoms were correlated with microorganisms. Endodontic treatment was effective in reducing bacteria and endotoxins but was not capable of completely removing them from the root canal.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
2018-12-11T17:12:37Z
2018-12-11T17:12:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.032
Journal of Endodontics, v. 43, n. 8, p. 1237-1245, 2017.
0099-2399
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174734
10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.032
2-s2.0-85020414336
2-s2.0-85020414336.pdf
9304600166583100
0000-0003-0987-5594
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.032
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174734
identifier_str_mv Journal of Endodontics, v. 43, n. 8, p. 1237-1245, 2017.
0099-2399
10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.032
2-s2.0-85020414336
2-s2.0-85020414336.pdf
9304600166583100
0000-0003-0987-5594
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Endodontics
1,585
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1237-1245
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797789895111999488