Photodynamic inactivation mediated by methylene blue or chlorin e6 against Streptococcus mutans biofilm

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nie, Min
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Deng, Dong Mei, Wu, Yafei, de Oliveira, Kleber Thiago, Bagnato, Vanderlei Salvador, Crielaard, Wim, Rastelli, Alessandra Nara de Souza [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101817
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200610
Resumo: Background: An appropriate photosensitizer (PS) for photodynamic inactivation should have a pronounced antimicrobial efficacy but low dark toxicity. The aim of this study is to investigate the concentration-dependent antimicrobial efficacies of methylene blue (MB) and chlorin e6 (Ce6), against Streptococcus mutans biofilms and to compare the efficacies of these two PSs. Methods: The 48-h S. mutans UA159 biofilms, grown on glass coverslips, were subjected to MB or Ce6 at 25, 50, 100 and 200 μM with or without irradiation by 660 nM LED light (L). Control groups (-PS-L and -PS + L) were also included. Viability of the biofilm was analyzed by CFU/biofilm and biofilm lactic acid production was quantified by an enzymatic assay. Results: With irradiation, MB under 25 μM resulted in 2-log reduction in biofilm viability and 30-fold reduction in biofilm lactic acid production. However, this biofilm killing efficacy did not change with increasing MB concentration. The biofilm killing efficacy of Ce6 increased with increasing Ce6 concentrations and resulted in 5-log reduction in biofilm viability. The lactic acid inhibitory effect of Ce6 was significantly lower than MB at 25 μM (p<0.01) but higher than MB at 200 μM (p=0.05), although the difference at 200 μM did not reach statistical significance. No dark toxicity could be observed for MB whereas low dark toxicity could be seen for Ce6 when the concentration is above 50 μM. Conclusion: Ce6 under 200 μM showed to be a more powerful PS for photodynamic inactivation than MB. Both Ce6- and MB-based photodynamic inactivation are useful methods for biofilm control in caries prevention.
id UNSP_6de3f2c9a7f60503e4c80dfafa527752
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200610
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Photodynamic inactivation mediated by methylene blue or chlorin e6 against Streptococcus mutans biofilmBiofilmChlorin e6Lactic acid productionMethylene bluePhotodynamic inactivationStreptococcus mutansBackground: An appropriate photosensitizer (PS) for photodynamic inactivation should have a pronounced antimicrobial efficacy but low dark toxicity. The aim of this study is to investigate the concentration-dependent antimicrobial efficacies of methylene blue (MB) and chlorin e6 (Ce6), against Streptococcus mutans biofilms and to compare the efficacies of these two PSs. Methods: The 48-h S. mutans UA159 biofilms, grown on glass coverslips, were subjected to MB or Ce6 at 25, 50, 100 and 200 μM with or without irradiation by 660 nM LED light (L). Control groups (-PS-L and -PS + L) were also included. Viability of the biofilm was analyzed by CFU/biofilm and biofilm lactic acid production was quantified by an enzymatic assay. Results: With irradiation, MB under 25 μM resulted in 2-log reduction in biofilm viability and 30-fold reduction in biofilm lactic acid production. However, this biofilm killing efficacy did not change with increasing MB concentration. The biofilm killing efficacy of Ce6 increased with increasing Ce6 concentrations and resulted in 5-log reduction in biofilm viability. The lactic acid inhibitory effect of Ce6 was significantly lower than MB at 25 μM (p<0.01) but higher than MB at 200 μM (p=0.05), although the difference at 200 μM did not reach statistical significance. No dark toxicity could be observed for MB whereas low dark toxicity could be seen for Ce6 when the concentration is above 50 μM. Conclusion: Ce6 under 200 μM showed to be a more powerful PS for photodynamic inactivation than MB. Both Ce6- and MB-based photodynamic inactivation are useful methods for biofilm control in caries prevention.State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases West China Hospital of Stomatology Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Preventive Dentistry Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamKey Lab of Oral Diseases of Gansu Province Northwest Minzu UniversityFederal University of São Carlos – UFSCar Department of ChemistryUniversity of São Paulo - USP Physics Institute of São Carlos - IFSC Optical Group Campus São CarlosUniversity of São Paulo State – UNESP Araraquara School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry, Campus AraraquaraUniversity of São Paulo State – UNESP Araraquara School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry, Campus AraraquaraSichuan UniversityUniversity of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamNorthwest Minzu UniversityUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Nie, MinDeng, Dong MeiWu, Yafeide Oliveira, Kleber ThiagoBagnato, Vanderlei SalvadorCrielaard, WimRastelli, Alessandra Nara de Souza [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:11:13Z2020-12-12T02:11:13Z2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101817Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, v. 31.1873-15971572-1000http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20061010.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.1018172-s2.0-85086568778Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPhotodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T14:48:17Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200610Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T14:48:17Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Photodynamic inactivation mediated by methylene blue or chlorin e6 against Streptococcus mutans biofilm
title Photodynamic inactivation mediated by methylene blue or chlorin e6 against Streptococcus mutans biofilm
spellingShingle Photodynamic inactivation mediated by methylene blue or chlorin e6 against Streptococcus mutans biofilm
Nie, Min
Biofilm
Chlorin e6
Lactic acid production
Methylene blue
Photodynamic inactivation
Streptococcus mutans
title_short Photodynamic inactivation mediated by methylene blue or chlorin e6 against Streptococcus mutans biofilm
title_full Photodynamic inactivation mediated by methylene blue or chlorin e6 against Streptococcus mutans biofilm
title_fullStr Photodynamic inactivation mediated by methylene blue or chlorin e6 against Streptococcus mutans biofilm
title_full_unstemmed Photodynamic inactivation mediated by methylene blue or chlorin e6 against Streptococcus mutans biofilm
title_sort Photodynamic inactivation mediated by methylene blue or chlorin e6 against Streptococcus mutans biofilm
author Nie, Min
author_facet Nie, Min
Deng, Dong Mei
Wu, Yafei
de Oliveira, Kleber Thiago
Bagnato, Vanderlei Salvador
Crielaard, Wim
Rastelli, Alessandra Nara de Souza [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Deng, Dong Mei
Wu, Yafei
de Oliveira, Kleber Thiago
Bagnato, Vanderlei Salvador
Crielaard, Wim
Rastelli, Alessandra Nara de Souza [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sichuan University
University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Northwest Minzu University
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nie, Min
Deng, Dong Mei
Wu, Yafei
de Oliveira, Kleber Thiago
Bagnato, Vanderlei Salvador
Crielaard, Wim
Rastelli, Alessandra Nara de Souza [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biofilm
Chlorin e6
Lactic acid production
Methylene blue
Photodynamic inactivation
Streptococcus mutans
topic Biofilm
Chlorin e6
Lactic acid production
Methylene blue
Photodynamic inactivation
Streptococcus mutans
description Background: An appropriate photosensitizer (PS) for photodynamic inactivation should have a pronounced antimicrobial efficacy but low dark toxicity. The aim of this study is to investigate the concentration-dependent antimicrobial efficacies of methylene blue (MB) and chlorin e6 (Ce6), against Streptococcus mutans biofilms and to compare the efficacies of these two PSs. Methods: The 48-h S. mutans UA159 biofilms, grown on glass coverslips, were subjected to MB or Ce6 at 25, 50, 100 and 200 μM with or without irradiation by 660 nM LED light (L). Control groups (-PS-L and -PS + L) were also included. Viability of the biofilm was analyzed by CFU/biofilm and biofilm lactic acid production was quantified by an enzymatic assay. Results: With irradiation, MB under 25 μM resulted in 2-log reduction in biofilm viability and 30-fold reduction in biofilm lactic acid production. However, this biofilm killing efficacy did not change with increasing MB concentration. The biofilm killing efficacy of Ce6 increased with increasing Ce6 concentrations and resulted in 5-log reduction in biofilm viability. The lactic acid inhibitory effect of Ce6 was significantly lower than MB at 25 μM (p<0.01) but higher than MB at 200 μM (p=0.05), although the difference at 200 μM did not reach statistical significance. No dark toxicity could be observed for MB whereas low dark toxicity could be seen for Ce6 when the concentration is above 50 μM. Conclusion: Ce6 under 200 μM showed to be a more powerful PS for photodynamic inactivation than MB. Both Ce6- and MB-based photodynamic inactivation are useful methods for biofilm control in caries prevention.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:11:13Z
2020-12-12T02:11:13Z
2020-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101817
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, v. 31.
1873-1597
1572-1000
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200610
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101817
2-s2.0-85086568778
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101817
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200610
identifier_str_mv Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, v. 31.
1873-1597
1572-1000
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101817
2-s2.0-85086568778
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964847554691072