Estimating cyclopoid copepod species richness and geographical distribution (Crustacea) across a large hydrographical basin: comparing between samples from water column (plankton) and macrophyte stands

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Perbiche-neves, Gilmar
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Rocha, Carlos E.f. Da, Nogueira, Marcos G. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702014000300005
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/110028
Resumo: Species richness and geographical distribution of Cyclopoida freshwater copepods were analyzed along the La Plata River basin. Ninety-six samples were taken from 24 sampling sites, twelve sites for zooplankton in open waters and twelve sites for zooplankton within macrophyte stands, including reservoirs and lotic stretches. There were, on average, three species per sample in the plankton compared to five per sample in macrophytes. Six species were exclusive to the plankton, 10 to macrophyte stands, and 17 were common to both. Only one species was found in similar proportions in plankton and macrophytes, while five species were widely found in plankton, and thirteen in macrophytes. The distinction between species from open water zooplankton and macrophytes was supported by nonmetric multidimensional analysis. There was no distinct pattern of endemicity within the basin, and double sampling contributes to this result. This lack of sub-regional faunal differentiation is in accordance with other studies that have shown that cyclopoids generally have wide geographical distribution in the Neotropics and that some species there are cosmopolitan. This contrasts with other freshwater copepods such as Calanoida and some Harpacticoida. We conclude that sampling plankton and macrophytes together provided a more accurate estimate of the richness and geographical distribution of these organisms than sampling in either one of those zones alone.
id UNSP_73fb6e760686bac4d081091fb0d063d5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/110028
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Estimating cyclopoid copepod species richness and geographical distribution (Crustacea) across a large hydrographical basin: comparing between samples from water column (plankton) and macrophyte standsLa Plata River basinreservoirsriverszooplanktonSpecies richness and geographical distribution of Cyclopoida freshwater copepods were analyzed along the La Plata River basin. Ninety-six samples were taken from 24 sampling sites, twelve sites for zooplankton in open waters and twelve sites for zooplankton within macrophyte stands, including reservoirs and lotic stretches. There were, on average, three species per sample in the plankton compared to five per sample in macrophytes. Six species were exclusive to the plankton, 10 to macrophyte stands, and 17 were common to both. Only one species was found in similar proportions in plankton and macrophytes, while five species were widely found in plankton, and thirteen in macrophytes. The distinction between species from open water zooplankton and macrophytes was supported by nonmetric multidimensional analysis. There was no distinct pattern of endemicity within the basin, and double sampling contributes to this result. This lack of sub-regional faunal differentiation is in accordance with other studies that have shown that cyclopoids generally have wide geographical distribution in the Neotropics and that some species there are cosmopolitan. This contrasts with other freshwater copepods such as Calanoida and some Harpacticoida. We conclude that sampling plankton and macrophytes together provided a more accurate estimate of the richness and geographical distribution of these organisms than sampling in either one of those zones alone.Universidade de São Paulo Instituto de Biociências Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biociências Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biociências Departamento de ZoologiaSociedade Brasileira de ZoologiaUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Perbiche-neves, GilmarRocha, Carlos E.f. DaNogueira, Marcos G. [UNESP]2014-10-01T13:08:46Z2014-10-01T13:08:46Z2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article239-244application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702014000300005Zoologia (Curitiba). Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 31, n. 3, p. 239-244, 2014.1984-4670http://hdl.handle.net/11449/11002810.1590/S1984-46702014000300005S1984-46702014000300005S1984-46702014000300005.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengZoologia (Curitiba)0,405info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-20T06:12:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/110028Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-20T06:12:55Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Estimating cyclopoid copepod species richness and geographical distribution (Crustacea) across a large hydrographical basin: comparing between samples from water column (plankton) and macrophyte stands
title Estimating cyclopoid copepod species richness and geographical distribution (Crustacea) across a large hydrographical basin: comparing between samples from water column (plankton) and macrophyte stands
spellingShingle Estimating cyclopoid copepod species richness and geographical distribution (Crustacea) across a large hydrographical basin: comparing between samples from water column (plankton) and macrophyte stands
Perbiche-neves, Gilmar
La Plata River basin
reservoirs
rivers
zooplankton
title_short Estimating cyclopoid copepod species richness and geographical distribution (Crustacea) across a large hydrographical basin: comparing between samples from water column (plankton) and macrophyte stands
title_full Estimating cyclopoid copepod species richness and geographical distribution (Crustacea) across a large hydrographical basin: comparing between samples from water column (plankton) and macrophyte stands
title_fullStr Estimating cyclopoid copepod species richness and geographical distribution (Crustacea) across a large hydrographical basin: comparing between samples from water column (plankton) and macrophyte stands
title_full_unstemmed Estimating cyclopoid copepod species richness and geographical distribution (Crustacea) across a large hydrographical basin: comparing between samples from water column (plankton) and macrophyte stands
title_sort Estimating cyclopoid copepod species richness and geographical distribution (Crustacea) across a large hydrographical basin: comparing between samples from water column (plankton) and macrophyte stands
author Perbiche-neves, Gilmar
author_facet Perbiche-neves, Gilmar
Rocha, Carlos E.f. Da
Nogueira, Marcos G. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Rocha, Carlos E.f. Da
Nogueira, Marcos G. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Perbiche-neves, Gilmar
Rocha, Carlos E.f. Da
Nogueira, Marcos G. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv La Plata River basin
reservoirs
rivers
zooplankton
topic La Plata River basin
reservoirs
rivers
zooplankton
description Species richness and geographical distribution of Cyclopoida freshwater copepods were analyzed along the La Plata River basin. Ninety-six samples were taken from 24 sampling sites, twelve sites for zooplankton in open waters and twelve sites for zooplankton within macrophyte stands, including reservoirs and lotic stretches. There were, on average, three species per sample in the plankton compared to five per sample in macrophytes. Six species were exclusive to the plankton, 10 to macrophyte stands, and 17 were common to both. Only one species was found in similar proportions in plankton and macrophytes, while five species were widely found in plankton, and thirteen in macrophytes. The distinction between species from open water zooplankton and macrophytes was supported by nonmetric multidimensional analysis. There was no distinct pattern of endemicity within the basin, and double sampling contributes to this result. This lack of sub-regional faunal differentiation is in accordance with other studies that have shown that cyclopoids generally have wide geographical distribution in the Neotropics and that some species there are cosmopolitan. This contrasts with other freshwater copepods such as Calanoida and some Harpacticoida. We conclude that sampling plankton and macrophytes together provided a more accurate estimate of the richness and geographical distribution of these organisms than sampling in either one of those zones alone.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-01T13:08:46Z
2014-10-01T13:08:46Z
2014-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702014000300005
Zoologia (Curitiba). Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 31, n. 3, p. 239-244, 2014.
1984-4670
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/110028
10.1590/S1984-46702014000300005
S1984-46702014000300005
S1984-46702014000300005.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702014000300005
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/110028
identifier_str_mv Zoologia (Curitiba). Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 31, n. 3, p. 239-244, 2014.
1984-4670
10.1590/S1984-46702014000300005
S1984-46702014000300005
S1984-46702014000300005.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Zoologia (Curitiba)
0,405
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 239-244
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1792961873052696576