Simple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration success

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Massi, Klécia G. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Chaves, Rafael B., Tambosi, Leandro R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.13520
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223238
Resumo: Legal regulation related to restoration monitoring should be supported and validated by studies that evaluate the performance of indicators. In Brazil, a specific state regulation uses three indicators to attest recovery: ground cover with native vegetation (i.e. canopy cover, for tropical forest restoration projects) and density and richness of native plants spontaneously regenerating. Thus, we adopted other three ecological parameters: richness of zoochorous regenerant species (a functioning indicator linked to seed dispersal), the density of non-pioneer regenerants (a composition indicator), and dominance (a structure indicator), to test whether the indicators of the legal state monitoring protocol were associated to these more qualified indicators and we discussed the state protocol effectiveness. We evaluated 10 sites under restoration in the Atlantic Forest ranging from 9 to 45 years old and a reference area. Our results showed that the three indicators of the state monitoring protocol were associated to more qualified indicators in different restored sites and they can be considered proxies of ecological parameters to monitor and attest restoration success of tropical rainforest. In addition, dominance was strongly associated with richness of regenerants, but it was not associated to density, implying that richness and density of regenerants are not redundant and both should be monitored in the field. This kind of analysis could be usefully applied to define powerful and integrative indicators elsewhere, simplifying them without losing effectiveness as a means to stimulate wide adoption of monitoring protocols in the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.
id UNSP_75255c2f863d471e4834f6f312e41766
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223238
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Simple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration successecological restorationindicatorsmonitoring protocolnatural regenerationpassive restorationpolicytropical forestLegal regulation related to restoration monitoring should be supported and validated by studies that evaluate the performance of indicators. In Brazil, a specific state regulation uses three indicators to attest recovery: ground cover with native vegetation (i.e. canopy cover, for tropical forest restoration projects) and density and richness of native plants spontaneously regenerating. Thus, we adopted other three ecological parameters: richness of zoochorous regenerant species (a functioning indicator linked to seed dispersal), the density of non-pioneer regenerants (a composition indicator), and dominance (a structure indicator), to test whether the indicators of the legal state monitoring protocol were associated to these more qualified indicators and we discussed the state protocol effectiveness. We evaluated 10 sites under restoration in the Atlantic Forest ranging from 9 to 45 years old and a reference area. Our results showed that the three indicators of the state monitoring protocol were associated to more qualified indicators in different restored sites and they can be considered proxies of ecological parameters to monitor and attest restoration success of tropical rainforest. In addition, dominance was strongly associated with richness of regenerants, but it was not associated to density, implying that richness and density of regenerants are not redundant and both should be monitored in the field. This kind of analysis could be usefully applied to define powerful and integrative indicators elsewhere, simplifying them without losing effectiveness as a means to stimulate wide adoption of monitoring protocols in the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.Departamento de Engenharia Ambiental Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, SPDepartamento de Ecologia Instituto de Biociências Universidade de São Paulo, SPSecretaria de Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente, SPSociedade Brasileira de Restauração Ecológica, PRCentro de Engenharia Modelagem e Ciências Sociais Aplicadas Universidade Federal do ABC, SPDepartamento de Engenharia Ambiental Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Secretaria de Infraestrutura e Meio AmbienteSociedade Brasileira de Restauração EcológicaUniversidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)Massi, Klécia G. [UNESP]Chaves, Rafael B.Tambosi, Leandro R.2022-04-28T19:49:31Z2022-04-28T19:49:31Z2022-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.13520Restoration Ecology, v. 30, n. 3, 2022.1526-100X1061-2971http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22323810.1111/rec.135202-s2.0-85122727455Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRestoration Ecologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:49:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223238Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:49:31Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Simple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration success
title Simple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration success
spellingShingle Simple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration success
Massi, Klécia G. [UNESP]
ecological restoration
indicators
monitoring protocol
natural regeneration
passive restoration
policy
tropical forest
title_short Simple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration success
title_full Simple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration success
title_fullStr Simple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration success
title_full_unstemmed Simple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration success
title_sort Simple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration success
author Massi, Klécia G. [UNESP]
author_facet Massi, Klécia G. [UNESP]
Chaves, Rafael B.
Tambosi, Leandro R.
author_role author
author2 Chaves, Rafael B.
Tambosi, Leandro R.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Secretaria de Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente
Sociedade Brasileira de Restauração Ecológica
Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Massi, Klécia G. [UNESP]
Chaves, Rafael B.
Tambosi, Leandro R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ecological restoration
indicators
monitoring protocol
natural regeneration
passive restoration
policy
tropical forest
topic ecological restoration
indicators
monitoring protocol
natural regeneration
passive restoration
policy
tropical forest
description Legal regulation related to restoration monitoring should be supported and validated by studies that evaluate the performance of indicators. In Brazil, a specific state regulation uses three indicators to attest recovery: ground cover with native vegetation (i.e. canopy cover, for tropical forest restoration projects) and density and richness of native plants spontaneously regenerating. Thus, we adopted other three ecological parameters: richness of zoochorous regenerant species (a functioning indicator linked to seed dispersal), the density of non-pioneer regenerants (a composition indicator), and dominance (a structure indicator), to test whether the indicators of the legal state monitoring protocol were associated to these more qualified indicators and we discussed the state protocol effectiveness. We evaluated 10 sites under restoration in the Atlantic Forest ranging from 9 to 45 years old and a reference area. Our results showed that the three indicators of the state monitoring protocol were associated to more qualified indicators in different restored sites and they can be considered proxies of ecological parameters to monitor and attest restoration success of tropical rainforest. In addition, dominance was strongly associated with richness of regenerants, but it was not associated to density, implying that richness and density of regenerants are not redundant and both should be monitored in the field. This kind of analysis could be usefully applied to define powerful and integrative indicators elsewhere, simplifying them without losing effectiveness as a means to stimulate wide adoption of monitoring protocols in the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-28T19:49:31Z
2022-04-28T19:49:31Z
2022-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.13520
Restoration Ecology, v. 30, n. 3, 2022.
1526-100X
1061-2971
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223238
10.1111/rec.13520
2-s2.0-85122727455
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.13520
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223238
identifier_str_mv Restoration Ecology, v. 30, n. 3, 2022.
1526-100X
1061-2971
10.1111/rec.13520
2-s2.0-85122727455
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Restoration Ecology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797789650732974080