Avaliação clínica de três sistemas de remoção minimamente invasivos do tecido cariado

• Autor(a) principal: Saliba, Nemre Adas [UNESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2010
• Outros Autores: Lima, Daniela Coêlho de [UNESP], Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba [UNESP], Saliba, Orlando [UNESP], Okamoto, Ana Cláudia [UNESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://apcdaracatuba.com.br/revista/Volume_30_01_2009/v30n1.htm; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/133480
• topic: Dental caries; Primary dentition; Pain; Anesthesia; Cárie dentária; Dentição decídua; Dor|Anestesia

The current philosophy of dentistry through the maximum preserving and minimum intervention has increased the interest in methods of ultraconservation cavities preparation. The aim of this study was to compare the ways of caries removal, mechanic and chemical-mechanic, using Carisolv™ and Papacárie® , in deciduous teeth evaluating the patients’ acceptability, presence and intensity of pain, anesthesia use, time of caries removal and presence of pain 24 hours after the treatments performance. The sample group was composed by 32 scholars between 6 and 10 years-old, mean age of 8.09 years and presenting as inclusion criteria at least two caries lesions in dentine. The children were divided in two groups of 16 patients. The Group I was represented by the mechanic and Carisolv™ treatments and the Group II, mechanic and Papacárie® . There was a great acceptability to the treatments (97%) and low anesthesia use (14%). In the Group I, 64% of the patients mentioned pain with the mechanical treatment and 33% of these classified it as strong. With Carisolv, 31% presented pain, and among them, 40% indicated it as strong. In the Group II, there was pain in 25% of children and of these, 50% identified it as strong, in both treatments. Only 6,25% of teeth treated showed a pain status 24 hours after the performance of the restorations. The mean time of the total caries removal by the mechanical and chemical-mechanical treatments in the Group I was respectively, in minutes, of 6.25 ± 2.33; 7.75 ± 2.49 and in the Group II of 6.75 ± 2.38; 7.37 ± 2.15. There were no differences statistically significant among the analyzed variables.