Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: López-Cabeza, Rocío
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Kah, Melanie, Grillo, Renato [UNESP], Bílková, Zuzana, Hofman, Jakub
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0nr08693b
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206080
Resumo: Loading active ingredients on nanocarrier systems is becoming a common strategy for improving pesticide formulations. One of the most important properties of these nanoformulations is the proportion of pesticide associated with the nanocarriers (encapsulation efficiency, EE). EE is often determined by centrifugal ultrafiltration. However, the losses of active ingredient in the centrifugal ultrafiltration devices are typically not assessed, potentially leading to erroneous results. In this work, the losses of three pesticides (tebuconazole, terbuthylazine and chlorpyrifos) during centrifugal ultrafiltration have been systematically evaluated for nine different devices. Results suggest that centrifugal ultrafiltration is not suitable for determining the EE of compounds such as chlorpyrifos as 100% losses were observed on all the devices tested. Losses of tebuconazole and terbuthylazine were highly variable according to the type of membrane and the lowest losses were observed in the devices with hydrophilic regenerated cellulose membranes. Based on these results, we propose a correction factor and demonstrate its application to calculate the EE of two nanoformulations based on poly(ϵ-caprolactone) nanocarriers. The approach extends the applicability of centrifugal ultrafiltration to a wider range of pesticide nanoformulations. We also discuss the effect of dilution on EE and make recommendations to improve the characterisation of nanoparticles-based pesticide nanoformulations in the future. This journal is
id UNSP_7aab27740837e10a64c0de6b07a82946
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206080
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?Loading active ingredients on nanocarrier systems is becoming a common strategy for improving pesticide formulations. One of the most important properties of these nanoformulations is the proportion of pesticide associated with the nanocarriers (encapsulation efficiency, EE). EE is often determined by centrifugal ultrafiltration. However, the losses of active ingredient in the centrifugal ultrafiltration devices are typically not assessed, potentially leading to erroneous results. In this work, the losses of three pesticides (tebuconazole, terbuthylazine and chlorpyrifos) during centrifugal ultrafiltration have been systematically evaluated for nine different devices. Results suggest that centrifugal ultrafiltration is not suitable for determining the EE of compounds such as chlorpyrifos as 100% losses were observed on all the devices tested. Losses of tebuconazole and terbuthylazine were highly variable according to the type of membrane and the lowest losses were observed in the devices with hydrophilic regenerated cellulose membranes. Based on these results, we propose a correction factor and demonstrate its application to calculate the EE of two nanoformulations based on poly(ϵ-caprolactone) nanocarriers. The approach extends the applicability of centrifugal ultrafiltration to a wider range of pesticide nanoformulations. We also discuss the effect of dilution on EE and make recommendations to improve the characterisation of nanoparticles-based pesticide nanoformulations in the future. This journal isResearch Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX) Faculty of Science Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5School of Environment University of Auckland, 23 Symonds StreetSão Paulo State University (UNESP) Department of Physics and Chemistry School of Sciences and EngineeringSão Paulo State University (UNESP) Department of Physics and Chemistry School of Sciences and EngineeringMasaryk UniversityUniversity of AucklandUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)López-Cabeza, RocíoKah, MelanieGrillo, Renato [UNESP]Bílková, ZuzanaHofman, Jakub2021-06-25T10:26:14Z2021-06-25T10:26:14Z2021-03-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article5410-5418http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0nr08693bNanoscale, v. 13, n. 10, p. 5410-5418, 2021.2040-33722040-3364http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20608010.1039/d0nr08693b2-s2.0-85102860594Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengNanoscaleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T20:56:08Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206080Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-22T20:56:08Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?
title Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?
spellingShingle Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?
López-Cabeza, Rocío
title_short Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?
title_full Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?
title_fullStr Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?
title_full_unstemmed Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?
title_sort Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?
author López-Cabeza, Rocío
author_facet López-Cabeza, Rocío
Kah, Melanie
Grillo, Renato [UNESP]
Bílková, Zuzana
Hofman, Jakub
author_role author
author2 Kah, Melanie
Grillo, Renato [UNESP]
Bílková, Zuzana
Hofman, Jakub
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Masaryk University
University of Auckland
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv López-Cabeza, Rocío
Kah, Melanie
Grillo, Renato [UNESP]
Bílková, Zuzana
Hofman, Jakub
description Loading active ingredients on nanocarrier systems is becoming a common strategy for improving pesticide formulations. One of the most important properties of these nanoformulations is the proportion of pesticide associated with the nanocarriers (encapsulation efficiency, EE). EE is often determined by centrifugal ultrafiltration. However, the losses of active ingredient in the centrifugal ultrafiltration devices are typically not assessed, potentially leading to erroneous results. In this work, the losses of three pesticides (tebuconazole, terbuthylazine and chlorpyrifos) during centrifugal ultrafiltration have been systematically evaluated for nine different devices. Results suggest that centrifugal ultrafiltration is not suitable for determining the EE of compounds such as chlorpyrifos as 100% losses were observed on all the devices tested. Losses of tebuconazole and terbuthylazine were highly variable according to the type of membrane and the lowest losses were observed in the devices with hydrophilic regenerated cellulose membranes. Based on these results, we propose a correction factor and demonstrate its application to calculate the EE of two nanoformulations based on poly(ϵ-caprolactone) nanocarriers. The approach extends the applicability of centrifugal ultrafiltration to a wider range of pesticide nanoformulations. We also discuss the effect of dilution on EE and make recommendations to improve the characterisation of nanoparticles-based pesticide nanoformulations in the future. This journal is
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:26:14Z
2021-06-25T10:26:14Z
2021-03-14
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0nr08693b
Nanoscale, v. 13, n. 10, p. 5410-5418, 2021.
2040-3372
2040-3364
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206080
10.1039/d0nr08693b
2-s2.0-85102860594
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0nr08693b
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206080
identifier_str_mv Nanoscale, v. 13, n. 10, p. 5410-5418, 2021.
2040-3372
2040-3364
10.1039/d0nr08693b
2-s2.0-85102860594
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Nanoscale
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 5410-5418
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965436908929024