Antifungal activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) oil and extracts, associated with carnauba wax nanoemulsions, on fungal control of harvest papaya

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Miranda, M. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Sun, X., Assis, O. B.G., Ference, C., Ferreira, M. D., Baldwin, E. A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1325.28
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222781
Resumo: Essential oils and plant extracts can be safe alternatives for reducing post-harvest decay in foods compared to synthetic preservatives. Ginger oil (GO) and ethanolic extracts (GE) has been in vitro studied. Antifungal activity associated with fruit coatings on papaya has not been exhaustively investigated until now. In this study, the antifungal activity of GOs and GEs to control Colletotrichum gloeosporioides was investigated. In vitro results showed that GO has higher activity compared to GE, significantly reducing mycelial growth. The measured minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of GOs and GE were 0.1 to 0.8% (v/v) and 2.5 to 5%, respectively. Petri dishes inoculated with C. gloeosporioides were coated with carnauba wax nanoemulsion (CWN), GO nanoemulsion (at 3 and 6%), and their combination. Results showed that after 24h plates treated with 3 or 6% of GO, and CWN exhibited significant inhibition of the mycelial zone (MZI). The combination of CWN coating and GO was more effective than GO alone. CWN coatings resulted in significantly higher MZI alone or when associated with GO, compared to GO itself or control-water. After 7 days, plates treated with GO resulted in the same MZI as control, and CWN demonstrated inhibition against C. gloeosporioides. In vivo tests on ‘Redland’ papayas coated with CWN showed effective control upon fungal growth. The lowest values of fungal disease severity occurred when CWN was associated with GO (at 3 and 6% v/v). By comparing the CWN and GO alone activities, CWN resulted in higher decay inhibition. At a concentration of 6% GO, the diseases severity were superior than that found in uncoated fruits, suggesting GO phytotoxicity at that level.
id UNSP_8813a22ba1d8afb55a4a162187758f03
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222781
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Antifungal activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) oil and extracts, associated with carnauba wax nanoemulsions, on fungal control of harvest papayaCarnauba wax nanoemulsionColletotrichum gloeosporioidesEdible coatingsEthanolic extractsPapaya decayEssential oils and plant extracts can be safe alternatives for reducing post-harvest decay in foods compared to synthetic preservatives. Ginger oil (GO) and ethanolic extracts (GE) has been in vitro studied. Antifungal activity associated with fruit coatings on papaya has not been exhaustively investigated until now. In this study, the antifungal activity of GOs and GEs to control Colletotrichum gloeosporioides was investigated. In vitro results showed that GO has higher activity compared to GE, significantly reducing mycelial growth. The measured minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of GOs and GE were 0.1 to 0.8% (v/v) and 2.5 to 5%, respectively. Petri dishes inoculated with C. gloeosporioides were coated with carnauba wax nanoemulsion (CWN), GO nanoemulsion (at 3 and 6%), and their combination. Results showed that after 24h plates treated with 3 or 6% of GO, and CWN exhibited significant inhibition of the mycelial zone (MZI). The combination of CWN coating and GO was more effective than GO alone. CWN coatings resulted in significantly higher MZI alone or when associated with GO, compared to GO itself or control-water. After 7 days, plates treated with GO resulted in the same MZI as control, and CWN demonstrated inhibition against C. gloeosporioides. In vivo tests on ‘Redland’ papayas coated with CWN showed effective control upon fungal growth. The lowest values of fungal disease severity occurred when CWN was associated with GO (at 3 and 6% v/v). By comparing the CWN and GO alone activities, CWN resulted in higher decay inhibition. At a concentration of 6% GO, the diseases severity were superior than that found in uncoated fruits, suggesting GO phytotoxicity at that level.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, SPUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ARS Horticultural Research LaboratoryBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation Embrapa InstrumentaçãoSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, SPFAPESP: 2016/23419-5FAPESP: 2018/10657-0CNPq: 407956/2016-6CNPq: 482535/2012-1CAPES: 88881.132643/2016-01Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)ARS Horticultural Research LaboratoryEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Miranda, M. [UNESP]Sun, X.Assis, O. B.G.Ference, C.Ferreira, M. D.Baldwin, E. A.2022-04-28T19:46:39Z2022-04-28T19:46:39Z2021-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article191-198http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1325.28Acta Horticulturae, v. 1325, p. 191-198.2406-61680567-7572http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22278110.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1325.282-s2.0-85118378510Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Horticulturaeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:46:39Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222781Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:46:39Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antifungal activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) oil and extracts, associated with carnauba wax nanoemulsions, on fungal control of harvest papaya
title Antifungal activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) oil and extracts, associated with carnauba wax nanoemulsions, on fungal control of harvest papaya
spellingShingle Antifungal activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) oil and extracts, associated with carnauba wax nanoemulsions, on fungal control of harvest papaya
Miranda, M. [UNESP]
Carnauba wax nanoemulsion
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Edible coatings
Ethanolic extracts
Papaya decay
title_short Antifungal activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) oil and extracts, associated with carnauba wax nanoemulsions, on fungal control of harvest papaya
title_full Antifungal activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) oil and extracts, associated with carnauba wax nanoemulsions, on fungal control of harvest papaya
title_fullStr Antifungal activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) oil and extracts, associated with carnauba wax nanoemulsions, on fungal control of harvest papaya
title_full_unstemmed Antifungal activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) oil and extracts, associated with carnauba wax nanoemulsions, on fungal control of harvest papaya
title_sort Antifungal activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) oil and extracts, associated with carnauba wax nanoemulsions, on fungal control of harvest papaya
author Miranda, M. [UNESP]
author_facet Miranda, M. [UNESP]
Sun, X.
Assis, O. B.G.
Ference, C.
Ferreira, M. D.
Baldwin, E. A.
author_role author
author2 Sun, X.
Assis, O. B.G.
Ference, C.
Ferreira, M. D.
Baldwin, E. A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
ARS Horticultural Research Laboratory
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miranda, M. [UNESP]
Sun, X.
Assis, O. B.G.
Ference, C.
Ferreira, M. D.
Baldwin, E. A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carnauba wax nanoemulsion
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Edible coatings
Ethanolic extracts
Papaya decay
topic Carnauba wax nanoemulsion
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Edible coatings
Ethanolic extracts
Papaya decay
description Essential oils and plant extracts can be safe alternatives for reducing post-harvest decay in foods compared to synthetic preservatives. Ginger oil (GO) and ethanolic extracts (GE) has been in vitro studied. Antifungal activity associated with fruit coatings on papaya has not been exhaustively investigated until now. In this study, the antifungal activity of GOs and GEs to control Colletotrichum gloeosporioides was investigated. In vitro results showed that GO has higher activity compared to GE, significantly reducing mycelial growth. The measured minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of GOs and GE were 0.1 to 0.8% (v/v) and 2.5 to 5%, respectively. Petri dishes inoculated with C. gloeosporioides were coated with carnauba wax nanoemulsion (CWN), GO nanoemulsion (at 3 and 6%), and their combination. Results showed that after 24h plates treated with 3 or 6% of GO, and CWN exhibited significant inhibition of the mycelial zone (MZI). The combination of CWN coating and GO was more effective than GO alone. CWN coatings resulted in significantly higher MZI alone or when associated with GO, compared to GO itself or control-water. After 7 days, plates treated with GO resulted in the same MZI as control, and CWN demonstrated inhibition against C. gloeosporioides. In vivo tests on ‘Redland’ papayas coated with CWN showed effective control upon fungal growth. The lowest values of fungal disease severity occurred when CWN was associated with GO (at 3 and 6% v/v). By comparing the CWN and GO alone activities, CWN resulted in higher decay inhibition. At a concentration of 6% GO, the diseases severity were superior than that found in uncoated fruits, suggesting GO phytotoxicity at that level.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-01
2022-04-28T19:46:39Z
2022-04-28T19:46:39Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1325.28
Acta Horticulturae, v. 1325, p. 191-198.
2406-6168
0567-7572
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222781
10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1325.28
2-s2.0-85118378510
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1325.28
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222781
identifier_str_mv Acta Horticulturae, v. 1325, p. 191-198.
2406-6168
0567-7572
10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1325.28
2-s2.0-85118378510
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Horticulturae
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 191-198
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965408882589696