COMPARATIVE FLORAL ANATOMY AND DEVELOPMENT IN NEOTROPICAL LAURACEAE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Graca Sajo, M. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Moraes, Pedro L. R. [UNESP], Assis, Leandro C. S., Rudall, Paula J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/687281
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/159049
Resumo: Premise of research. The pantropical magnoliid family Lauraceae has an extensive macrofossil record that dates back to the Early Cretaceous. However, flower anatomy among extant species is relatively poorly known. We investigate flower structure and development in six Neotropical genera to elucidate the homologies of the floral parts, especially the prominent appendages that occur on the filaments of the inner fertile stamen whorl in some species. Methodology. We used SEM and LM to examine flower organization and development in 11 species of six genera (Aniba, Cryptocarya, Endlicheria, Licaria, Nectandra, Ocotea) and flower vasculature in two species (Cryptocarya moschata and Ocotea prolifera). Pivotal results. All the flowers examined are typical of Lauraceae: they are very small and possess two whorls of tepals that are similarly vascularized, with three bundles each (resembling bracteopetals), multiple androecium whorls, and a single carpel. Variation exists in some characters, especially in the androecium. A fourth (innermost) androecial whorl is present as staminodia in some species. The prominent stamen appendages are highly vascularized. Conclusions. The presence of three vascular bundles supplying both outer and inner tepals supports their potential homology as bracteotepals. Floral vasculature also indicates that the staminodia of the fourth androecial whorl are derived from stamens. A potential homology between the stamens and appendages remains debatable, because existing evidence is contradictory.
id UNSP_8f3692bf80cc4d93253545a76bc09296
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/159049
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling COMPARATIVE FLORAL ANATOMY AND DEVELOPMENT IN NEOTROPICAL LAURACEAEbracteopetalsfloral developmenthomologystamen appendagesstaminodesvasculaturePremise of research. The pantropical magnoliid family Lauraceae has an extensive macrofossil record that dates back to the Early Cretaceous. However, flower anatomy among extant species is relatively poorly known. We investigate flower structure and development in six Neotropical genera to elucidate the homologies of the floral parts, especially the prominent appendages that occur on the filaments of the inner fertile stamen whorl in some species. Methodology. We used SEM and LM to examine flower organization and development in 11 species of six genera (Aniba, Cryptocarya, Endlicheria, Licaria, Nectandra, Ocotea) and flower vasculature in two species (Cryptocarya moschata and Ocotea prolifera). Pivotal results. All the flowers examined are typical of Lauraceae: they are very small and possess two whorls of tepals that are similarly vascularized, with three bundles each (resembling bracteopetals), multiple androecium whorls, and a single carpel. Variation exists in some characters, especially in the androecium. A fourth (innermost) androecial whorl is present as staminodia in some species. The prominent stamen appendages are highly vascularized. Conclusions. The presence of three vascular bundles supplying both outer and inner tepals supports their potential homology as bracteotepals. Floral vasculature also indicates that the staminodia of the fourth androecial whorl are derived from stamens. A potential homology between the stamens and appendages remains debatable, because existing evidence is contradictory.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)PLRMFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Univ Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Bot, BR-13506900 Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Minas Gerais, Inst Biociencias, Dept Bot, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilRoyal Bot Gardens, Richmond TW9 3AB, Surrey, EnglandUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Bot, BR-13506900 Sao Paulo, BrazilFAPEMIG: APQ-01225-13FAPESP: 2010/08382-1Univ Chicago PressUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Royal Bot GardensGraca Sajo, M. [UNESP]Moraes, Pedro L. R. [UNESP]Assis, Leandro C. S.Rudall, Paula J.2018-11-26T15:31:05Z2018-11-26T15:31:05Z2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article579-589application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086/687281International Journal Of Plant Sciences. Chicago: Univ Chicago Press, v. 177, n. 7, p. 579-589, 2016.1058-5893http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15904910.1086/687281WOS:000382232000003WOS000382232000003.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal Of Plant Sciences0,798info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-14T06:17:46Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/159049Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-01-14T06:17:46Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARATIVE FLORAL ANATOMY AND DEVELOPMENT IN NEOTROPICAL LAURACEAE
title COMPARATIVE FLORAL ANATOMY AND DEVELOPMENT IN NEOTROPICAL LAURACEAE
spellingShingle COMPARATIVE FLORAL ANATOMY AND DEVELOPMENT IN NEOTROPICAL LAURACEAE
Graca Sajo, M. [UNESP]
bracteopetals
floral development
homology
stamen appendages
staminodes
vasculature
title_short COMPARATIVE FLORAL ANATOMY AND DEVELOPMENT IN NEOTROPICAL LAURACEAE
title_full COMPARATIVE FLORAL ANATOMY AND DEVELOPMENT IN NEOTROPICAL LAURACEAE
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE FLORAL ANATOMY AND DEVELOPMENT IN NEOTROPICAL LAURACEAE
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE FLORAL ANATOMY AND DEVELOPMENT IN NEOTROPICAL LAURACEAE
title_sort COMPARATIVE FLORAL ANATOMY AND DEVELOPMENT IN NEOTROPICAL LAURACEAE
author Graca Sajo, M. [UNESP]
author_facet Graca Sajo, M. [UNESP]
Moraes, Pedro L. R. [UNESP]
Assis, Leandro C. S.
Rudall, Paula J.
author_role author
author2 Moraes, Pedro L. R. [UNESP]
Assis, Leandro C. S.
Rudall, Paula J.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Royal Bot Gardens
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Graca Sajo, M. [UNESP]
Moraes, Pedro L. R. [UNESP]
Assis, Leandro C. S.
Rudall, Paula J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bracteopetals
floral development
homology
stamen appendages
staminodes
vasculature
topic bracteopetals
floral development
homology
stamen appendages
staminodes
vasculature
description Premise of research. The pantropical magnoliid family Lauraceae has an extensive macrofossil record that dates back to the Early Cretaceous. However, flower anatomy among extant species is relatively poorly known. We investigate flower structure and development in six Neotropical genera to elucidate the homologies of the floral parts, especially the prominent appendages that occur on the filaments of the inner fertile stamen whorl in some species. Methodology. We used SEM and LM to examine flower organization and development in 11 species of six genera (Aniba, Cryptocarya, Endlicheria, Licaria, Nectandra, Ocotea) and flower vasculature in two species (Cryptocarya moschata and Ocotea prolifera). Pivotal results. All the flowers examined are typical of Lauraceae: they are very small and possess two whorls of tepals that are similarly vascularized, with three bundles each (resembling bracteopetals), multiple androecium whorls, and a single carpel. Variation exists in some characters, especially in the androecium. A fourth (innermost) androecial whorl is present as staminodia in some species. The prominent stamen appendages are highly vascularized. Conclusions. The presence of three vascular bundles supplying both outer and inner tepals supports their potential homology as bracteotepals. Floral vasculature also indicates that the staminodia of the fourth androecial whorl are derived from stamens. A potential homology between the stamens and appendages remains debatable, because existing evidence is contradictory.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-01
2018-11-26T15:31:05Z
2018-11-26T15:31:05Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/687281
International Journal Of Plant Sciences. Chicago: Univ Chicago Press, v. 177, n. 7, p. 579-589, 2016.
1058-5893
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/159049
10.1086/687281
WOS:000382232000003
WOS000382232000003.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/687281
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/159049
identifier_str_mv International Journal Of Plant Sciences. Chicago: Univ Chicago Press, v. 177, n. 7, p. 579-589, 2016.
1058-5893
10.1086/687281
WOS:000382232000003
WOS000382232000003.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal Of Plant Sciences
0,798
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 579-589
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Chicago Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Chicago Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965610174578688