Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Galhardi, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Luiz De Oliveira, Jhones [UNESP], Ghoshal, Subhasis, Fraceto, Leonardo Fernandes [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241949
Resumo: The benefits of the use of green nanotechnology to improve food security and sustainable agriculture have been highlighted in the past few years, such as through the encapsulation of active ingredients derived from botanical compounds. To evaluate ecological risks and to contribute to the development of safer nanoparticles for use in agricultural applications, this paper focused on the effects of the encapsulation of two mixtures of botanical pesticides (geraniol (GRL) and eugenol (EGL), and GRL and cinnamaldehyde (CND); concentration of active ingredients (a.i.) of 5, 20, and 100 mg a.i./kg-1) into zein nanoparticles on soil enzyme activities (acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase, β-1,4-glucosidase) at different incubation times (2, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days). Soils were also treated with pure zein nanoparticles at the same concentrations as those of the nanoformulations. The control samples consisted of untreated soils. Acid phosphatase was the most sensitive enzyme to the nanopesticide formulations applied at a high dosage (100 mg kg-1) following 2 weeks of the exposure, whereas arylsulfatase and β-1,4-glucosidase showed no significant responses to increasing doses of the nanopesticides, indicating soil enzyme resilience after pesticide exposure. Different concentrations of salt (NaCl; 0.01-0.4 mol L-1pH 7), humic acid (5-20 mg L-1pH 7), and pH (5-9) were shown to affect nanopesticides' properties in solution (e.g., particle diameter increased with the increase of the ionic strength, humic acid, and pH). Such results underline the potential uses of hydrolases as indicators of the soil quality and resilience as well as the effects of characteristics of a soil solution on particles' dynamics, mobility, and toxicity, which have important implications to assess soil health in response to botanical nanopesticides.
id UNSP_a371dcdbee4f29b0bf6b1a711b8ec8ce
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241949
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agricultureenvironmental indicatorsnanoparticlesnanopesticidessoil enzymeszeinThe benefits of the use of green nanotechnology to improve food security and sustainable agriculture have been highlighted in the past few years, such as through the encapsulation of active ingredients derived from botanical compounds. To evaluate ecological risks and to contribute to the development of safer nanoparticles for use in agricultural applications, this paper focused on the effects of the encapsulation of two mixtures of botanical pesticides (geraniol (GRL) and eugenol (EGL), and GRL and cinnamaldehyde (CND); concentration of active ingredients (a.i.) of 5, 20, and 100 mg a.i./kg-1) into zein nanoparticles on soil enzyme activities (acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase, β-1,4-glucosidase) at different incubation times (2, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days). Soils were also treated with pure zein nanoparticles at the same concentrations as those of the nanoformulations. The control samples consisted of untreated soils. Acid phosphatase was the most sensitive enzyme to the nanopesticide formulations applied at a high dosage (100 mg kg-1) following 2 weeks of the exposure, whereas arylsulfatase and β-1,4-glucosidase showed no significant responses to increasing doses of the nanopesticides, indicating soil enzyme resilience after pesticide exposure. Different concentrations of salt (NaCl; 0.01-0.4 mol L-1pH 7), humic acid (5-20 mg L-1pH 7), and pH (5-9) were shown to affect nanopesticides' properties in solution (e.g., particle diameter increased with the increase of the ionic strength, humic acid, and pH). Such results underline the potential uses of hydrolases as indicators of the soil quality and resilience as well as the effects of characteristics of a soil solution on particles' dynamics, mobility, and toxicity, which have important implications to assess soil health in response to botanical nanopesticides.Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida Três de Março 511, Alto da Boa Vista, SorocabaDepartment of Agricultural Production Sciences Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), JaboticabalDepartment of Civil Engineering McGill UniversityInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida Três de Março 511, Alto da Boa Vista, SorocabaDepartment of Agricultural Production Sciences Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), JaboticabalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)McGill UniversityGalhardi, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP]Luiz De Oliveira, Jhones [UNESP]Ghoshal, SubhasisFraceto, Leonardo Fernandes [UNESP]2023-03-02T05:01:55Z2023-03-02T05:01:55Z2022-06-20info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article443-452http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234ACS Agricultural Science and Technology, v. 2, n. 3, p. 443-452, 2022.2692-1952http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24194910.1021/acsagscitech.1c002342-s2.0-85132215249Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengACS Agricultural Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-02T05:01:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241949Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-03-02T05:01:55Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture
title Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture
spellingShingle Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture
Galhardi, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP]
environmental indicators
nanoparticles
nanopesticides
soil enzymes
zein
title_short Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture
title_full Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture
title_fullStr Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture
title_full_unstemmed Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture
title_sort Soil Enzyme Responses to Polymeric Nanopesticides: An Ecological Risk Analysis Approach to Promote Sustainable Agriculture
author Galhardi, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP]
author_facet Galhardi, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP]
Luiz De Oliveira, Jhones [UNESP]
Ghoshal, Subhasis
Fraceto, Leonardo Fernandes [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Luiz De Oliveira, Jhones [UNESP]
Ghoshal, Subhasis
Fraceto, Leonardo Fernandes [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
McGill University
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Galhardi, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP]
Luiz De Oliveira, Jhones [UNESP]
Ghoshal, Subhasis
Fraceto, Leonardo Fernandes [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv environmental indicators
nanoparticles
nanopesticides
soil enzymes
zein
topic environmental indicators
nanoparticles
nanopesticides
soil enzymes
zein
description The benefits of the use of green nanotechnology to improve food security and sustainable agriculture have been highlighted in the past few years, such as through the encapsulation of active ingredients derived from botanical compounds. To evaluate ecological risks and to contribute to the development of safer nanoparticles for use in agricultural applications, this paper focused on the effects of the encapsulation of two mixtures of botanical pesticides (geraniol (GRL) and eugenol (EGL), and GRL and cinnamaldehyde (CND); concentration of active ingredients (a.i.) of 5, 20, and 100 mg a.i./kg-1) into zein nanoparticles on soil enzyme activities (acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase, β-1,4-glucosidase) at different incubation times (2, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days). Soils were also treated with pure zein nanoparticles at the same concentrations as those of the nanoformulations. The control samples consisted of untreated soils. Acid phosphatase was the most sensitive enzyme to the nanopesticide formulations applied at a high dosage (100 mg kg-1) following 2 weeks of the exposure, whereas arylsulfatase and β-1,4-glucosidase showed no significant responses to increasing doses of the nanopesticides, indicating soil enzyme resilience after pesticide exposure. Different concentrations of salt (NaCl; 0.01-0.4 mol L-1pH 7), humic acid (5-20 mg L-1pH 7), and pH (5-9) were shown to affect nanopesticides' properties in solution (e.g., particle diameter increased with the increase of the ionic strength, humic acid, and pH). Such results underline the potential uses of hydrolases as indicators of the soil quality and resilience as well as the effects of characteristics of a soil solution on particles' dynamics, mobility, and toxicity, which have important implications to assess soil health in response to botanical nanopesticides.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-20
2023-03-02T05:01:55Z
2023-03-02T05:01:55Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234
ACS Agricultural Science and Technology, v. 2, n. 3, p. 443-452, 2022.
2692-1952
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241949
10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234
2-s2.0-85132215249
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241949
identifier_str_mv ACS Agricultural Science and Technology, v. 2, n. 3, p. 443-452, 2022.
2692-1952
10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00234
2-s2.0-85132215249
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv ACS Agricultural Science and Technology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 443-452
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964697276973056