A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-treatment trial): Study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fuchs, Flávio D.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Fuchs, Sandra C., Moreira, Leila B., Gus, Miguel, Nóbrega, Antônio C., Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos E., Mion, Décio, Bortolotto, Luiz, Consolim-Colombo, Fernanda, Nobre, Fernando, Coelho, Eduardo B., Vilela-Martin, José F., Moreno Jr, Heitor, Cesarino, Evandro J., Franco, Roberto [UNESP], Brandão, Andréa A., de Sousa, Marcos R., Pinho Ribeiro, Antônio L., Jardim, Paulo C., Neto, Abrahão A., Scala, Luiz C.N., Mota, Marco, Chaves, Hilton, Alves, João G., Sobral Filho, Dario C., e Silva, Ricardo P., Figueiredo Neto, José A., Irigoyen, Maria C., Castro, Iran, Steffens, André A., Schlatter, Rosane, de Mello, Renato B., Mosele, Francisca, Ghizzoni, Flávia, Berwanger, Otávio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-53
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/72312
Resumo: Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in Brazil, and hypertension is its major risk factor. The benefit of its drug treatment to prevent major cardiovascular events was consistently demonstrated. Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) have been the preferential drugs in the management of hypertension worldwide, despite the absence of any consistent evidence of advantage over older agents, and the concern that they may be associated with lower renal protection and risk for cancer. Diuretics are as efficacious as other agents, are well tolerated, have longer duration of action and low cost, but have been scarcely compared with ARBs. A study comparing diuretic and ARB is therefore warranted.Methods/design: This is a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial, comparing the association of chlorthalidone and amiloride with losartan as first drug option in patients aged 30 to 70 years, with stage I hypertension. The primary outcomes will be variation of blood pressure by time, adverse events and development or worsening of microalbuminuria and of left ventricular hypertrophy in the EKG. The secondary outcomes will be fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events: myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, evidence of new subclinical atherosclerosis and sudden death. The study will last 18 months. The sample size will be of 1200 participants for group in order to confer enough power to test for all primary outcomes. The project was approved by the Ethics committee of each participating institution.Discussion: The putative pleiotropic effects of ARB agents, particularly renal protection, have been disputed, and they have been scarcely compared with diuretics in large clinical trials, despite that they have been at least as efficacious as newer agents in managing hypertension. Even if the null hypothesis is not rejected, the information will be useful for health care policy to treat hypertension in Brazil. Clinical trials registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00971165. © 2011 Fuchs et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
id UNSP_a7d91bf6eac51dc4bfdeb4e31cbcf4c1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/72312
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-treatment trial): Study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trialamilorideamlodipinechlortalidonedipeptidyl carboxypeptidase inhibitorlosartanpotassium sparing diuretic agentpropranololangiotensin 1 receptor antagonistantihypertensive agentdiuretic agentatherosclerosisblood pressureblood pressure measurementdisease severitydouble blind procedureelectrocardiogramethicsfollow upheart arrhythmiaheart failureheart infarctionheart left ventricle hypertrophyhumanhyperglycemiahypertensionhypokalemialifestyle modificationmedical researchmicroalbuminuriaoutcome assessmentoutpatientrandomized controlled trialrenal protectionstrokesudden deathadultagedBrazilclinical trialcomparative studycontrolled clinical trialcontrolled studydrug combinationdrug effectfemalehospitalizationmalemethodologymiddle agedmulticenter studypathophysiologytimetreatment outcomeAdultAgedAmilorideAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureChlorthalidoneDiureticsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypertensionLosartanMaleMiddle AgedResearch DesignSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBackground: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in Brazil, and hypertension is its major risk factor. The benefit of its drug treatment to prevent major cardiovascular events was consistently demonstrated. Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) have been the preferential drugs in the management of hypertension worldwide, despite the absence of any consistent evidence of advantage over older agents, and the concern that they may be associated with lower renal protection and risk for cancer. Diuretics are as efficacious as other agents, are well tolerated, have longer duration of action and low cost, but have been scarcely compared with ARBs. A study comparing diuretic and ARB is therefore warranted.Methods/design: This is a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial, comparing the association of chlorthalidone and amiloride with losartan as first drug option in patients aged 30 to 70 years, with stage I hypertension. The primary outcomes will be variation of blood pressure by time, adverse events and development or worsening of microalbuminuria and of left ventricular hypertrophy in the EKG. The secondary outcomes will be fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events: myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, evidence of new subclinical atherosclerosis and sudden death. The study will last 18 months. The sample size will be of 1200 participants for group in order to confer enough power to test for all primary outcomes. The project was approved by the Ethics committee of each participating institution.Discussion: The putative pleiotropic effects of ARB agents, particularly renal protection, have been disputed, and they have been scarcely compared with diuretics in large clinical trials, despite that they have been at least as efficacious as newer agents in managing hypertension. Even if the null hypothesis is not rejected, the information will be useful for health care policy to treat hypertension in Brazil. Clinical trials registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00971165. © 2011 Fuchs et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto AlegreHospital Universitário Antônio Pedro Universidade Federal Fluminense, NiteróiHospital São Lucas Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto AlegreHospital das Clinicas Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloInstituto do Coração Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão PretoFaculdade de Medicina São José do Rio Preto São José do Rio PretoFaculdade de Ciências Médicas Universidade de Campinas, CampinasFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão PretoFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual de São Paulo, BotucatuUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de JaneiroHospital das Clínicas Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo HorizonteHospital das Clínicas de Goiânia Universidade Federal de Goiás, GoiâniaAnis Rassi Hospital, GoiâniaHospital Universitário Júlio Muller Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, CuiabáFaculdade de Medicina Universidade de Ciências da Saúde Alagoas, MaceióFaculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, RecifeInstituto de Medicina Integral Prof Fernando Figueira, RecifeHospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz/PROCAPE Universidade de Pernambuco, RecifeHospital Universitário Valter Cantídio Universidade Federal do Ceará, FortalezaHospital Universitário Universidade Federal Maranhão, São LuizInstituto de Cardiologia Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto AlegreFaculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal de Pelotas, PelotasHospital do Coração, São PauloFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual de São Paulo, BotucatuUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)São José do Rio PretoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)Anis Rassi HospitalUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoUniversidade de Ciências da Saúde AlagoasUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof Fernando FigueiraUniversidade de PernambucoUniversidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)Universidade Federal MaranhãoFundação Universitária de CardiologiaUniversidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)Hospital do CoraçãoFuchs, Flávio D.Fuchs, Sandra C.Moreira, Leila B.Gus, MiguelNóbrega, Antônio C.Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos E.Mion, DécioBortolotto, LuizConsolim-Colombo, FernandaNobre, FernandoCoelho, Eduardo B.Vilela-Martin, José F.Moreno Jr, HeitorCesarino, Evandro J.Franco, Roberto [UNESP]Brandão, Andréa A.de Sousa, Marcos R.Pinho Ribeiro, Antônio L.Jardim, Paulo C.Neto, Abrahão A.Scala, Luiz C.N.Mota, MarcoChaves, HiltonAlves, João G.Sobral Filho, Dario C.e Silva, Ricardo P.Figueiredo Neto, José A.Irigoyen, Maria C.Castro, IranSteffens, André A.Schlatter, Rosanede Mello, Renato B.Mosele, FranciscaGhizzoni, FláviaBerwanger, Otávio2014-05-27T11:25:28Z2014-05-27T11:25:28Z2011-02-24info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-53Trials, v. 12.1745-6215http://hdl.handle.net/11449/7231210.1186/1745-6215-12-532-s2.0-799519564922-s2.0-79951956492.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengTrials2.0671,291info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-21T06:19:41Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/72312Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-01-21T06:19:41Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-treatment trial): Study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial
title A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-treatment trial): Study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial
spellingShingle A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-treatment trial): Study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial
Fuchs, Flávio D.
amiloride
amlodipine
chlortalidone
dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase inhibitor
losartan
potassium sparing diuretic agent
propranolol
angiotensin 1 receptor antagonist
antihypertensive agent
diuretic agent
atherosclerosis
blood pressure
blood pressure measurement
disease severity
double blind procedure
electrocardiogram
ethics
follow up
heart arrhythmia
heart failure
heart infarction
heart left ventricle hypertrophy
human
hyperglycemia
hypertension
hypokalemia
lifestyle modification
medical research
microalbuminuria
outcome assessment
outpatient
randomized controlled trial
renal protection
stroke
sudden death
adult
aged
Brazil
clinical trial
comparative study
controlled clinical trial
controlled study
drug combination
drug effect
female
hospitalization
male
methodology
middle aged
multicenter study
pathophysiology
time
treatment outcome
Adult
Aged
Amiloride
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Agents
Blood Pressure
Chlorthalidone
Diuretics
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Hypertension
Losartan
Male
Middle Aged
Research Design
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title_short A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-treatment trial): Study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial
title_full A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-treatment trial): Study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial
title_fullStr A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-treatment trial): Study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-treatment trial): Study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial
title_sort A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-treatment trial): Study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial
author Fuchs, Flávio D.
author_facet Fuchs, Flávio D.
Fuchs, Sandra C.
Moreira, Leila B.
Gus, Miguel
Nóbrega, Antônio C.
Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos E.
Mion, Décio
Bortolotto, Luiz
Consolim-Colombo, Fernanda
Nobre, Fernando
Coelho, Eduardo B.
Vilela-Martin, José F.
Moreno Jr, Heitor
Cesarino, Evandro J.
Franco, Roberto [UNESP]
Brandão, Andréa A.
de Sousa, Marcos R.
Pinho Ribeiro, Antônio L.
Jardim, Paulo C.
Neto, Abrahão A.
Scala, Luiz C.N.
Mota, Marco
Chaves, Hilton
Alves, João G.
Sobral Filho, Dario C.
e Silva, Ricardo P.
Figueiredo Neto, José A.
Irigoyen, Maria C.
Castro, Iran
Steffens, André A.
Schlatter, Rosane
de Mello, Renato B.
Mosele, Francisca
Ghizzoni, Flávia
Berwanger, Otávio
author_role author
author2 Fuchs, Sandra C.
Moreira, Leila B.
Gus, Miguel
Nóbrega, Antônio C.
Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos E.
Mion, Décio
Bortolotto, Luiz
Consolim-Colombo, Fernanda
Nobre, Fernando
Coelho, Eduardo B.
Vilela-Martin, José F.
Moreno Jr, Heitor
Cesarino, Evandro J.
Franco, Roberto [UNESP]
Brandão, Andréa A.
de Sousa, Marcos R.
Pinho Ribeiro, Antônio L.
Jardim, Paulo C.
Neto, Abrahão A.
Scala, Luiz C.N.
Mota, Marco
Chaves, Hilton
Alves, João G.
Sobral Filho, Dario C.
e Silva, Ricardo P.
Figueiredo Neto, José A.
Irigoyen, Maria C.
Castro, Iran
Steffens, André A.
Schlatter, Rosane
de Mello, Renato B.
Mosele, Francisca
Ghizzoni, Flávia
Berwanger, Otávio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
São José do Rio Preto
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
Anis Rassi Hospital
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Universidade de Ciências da Saúde Alagoas
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)
Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof Fernando Figueira
Universidade de Pernambuco
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Universidade Federal Maranhão
Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia
Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)
Hospital do Coração
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fuchs, Flávio D.
Fuchs, Sandra C.
Moreira, Leila B.
Gus, Miguel
Nóbrega, Antônio C.
Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos E.
Mion, Décio
Bortolotto, Luiz
Consolim-Colombo, Fernanda
Nobre, Fernando
Coelho, Eduardo B.
Vilela-Martin, José F.
Moreno Jr, Heitor
Cesarino, Evandro J.
Franco, Roberto [UNESP]
Brandão, Andréa A.
de Sousa, Marcos R.
Pinho Ribeiro, Antônio L.
Jardim, Paulo C.
Neto, Abrahão A.
Scala, Luiz C.N.
Mota, Marco
Chaves, Hilton
Alves, João G.
Sobral Filho, Dario C.
e Silva, Ricardo P.
Figueiredo Neto, José A.
Irigoyen, Maria C.
Castro, Iran
Steffens, André A.
Schlatter, Rosane
de Mello, Renato B.
Mosele, Francisca
Ghizzoni, Flávia
Berwanger, Otávio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv amiloride
amlodipine
chlortalidone
dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase inhibitor
losartan
potassium sparing diuretic agent
propranolol
angiotensin 1 receptor antagonist
antihypertensive agent
diuretic agent
atherosclerosis
blood pressure
blood pressure measurement
disease severity
double blind procedure
electrocardiogram
ethics
follow up
heart arrhythmia
heart failure
heart infarction
heart left ventricle hypertrophy
human
hyperglycemia
hypertension
hypokalemia
lifestyle modification
medical research
microalbuminuria
outcome assessment
outpatient
randomized controlled trial
renal protection
stroke
sudden death
adult
aged
Brazil
clinical trial
comparative study
controlled clinical trial
controlled study
drug combination
drug effect
female
hospitalization
male
methodology
middle aged
multicenter study
pathophysiology
time
treatment outcome
Adult
Aged
Amiloride
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Agents
Blood Pressure
Chlorthalidone
Diuretics
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Hypertension
Losartan
Male
Middle Aged
Research Design
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
topic amiloride
amlodipine
chlortalidone
dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase inhibitor
losartan
potassium sparing diuretic agent
propranolol
angiotensin 1 receptor antagonist
antihypertensive agent
diuretic agent
atherosclerosis
blood pressure
blood pressure measurement
disease severity
double blind procedure
electrocardiogram
ethics
follow up
heart arrhythmia
heart failure
heart infarction
heart left ventricle hypertrophy
human
hyperglycemia
hypertension
hypokalemia
lifestyle modification
medical research
microalbuminuria
outcome assessment
outpatient
randomized controlled trial
renal protection
stroke
sudden death
adult
aged
Brazil
clinical trial
comparative study
controlled clinical trial
controlled study
drug combination
drug effect
female
hospitalization
male
methodology
middle aged
multicenter study
pathophysiology
time
treatment outcome
Adult
Aged
Amiloride
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Agents
Blood Pressure
Chlorthalidone
Diuretics
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Hypertension
Losartan
Male
Middle Aged
Research Design
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
description Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in Brazil, and hypertension is its major risk factor. The benefit of its drug treatment to prevent major cardiovascular events was consistently demonstrated. Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) have been the preferential drugs in the management of hypertension worldwide, despite the absence of any consistent evidence of advantage over older agents, and the concern that they may be associated with lower renal protection and risk for cancer. Diuretics are as efficacious as other agents, are well tolerated, have longer duration of action and low cost, but have been scarcely compared with ARBs. A study comparing diuretic and ARB is therefore warranted.Methods/design: This is a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial, comparing the association of chlorthalidone and amiloride with losartan as first drug option in patients aged 30 to 70 years, with stage I hypertension. The primary outcomes will be variation of blood pressure by time, adverse events and development or worsening of microalbuminuria and of left ventricular hypertrophy in the EKG. The secondary outcomes will be fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events: myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, evidence of new subclinical atherosclerosis and sudden death. The study will last 18 months. The sample size will be of 1200 participants for group in order to confer enough power to test for all primary outcomes. The project was approved by the Ethics committee of each participating institution.Discussion: The putative pleiotropic effects of ARB agents, particularly renal protection, have been disputed, and they have been scarcely compared with diuretics in large clinical trials, despite that they have been at least as efficacious as newer agents in managing hypertension. Even if the null hypothesis is not rejected, the information will be useful for health care policy to treat hypertension in Brazil. Clinical trials registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00971165. © 2011 Fuchs et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-02-24
2014-05-27T11:25:28Z
2014-05-27T11:25:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-53
Trials, v. 12.
1745-6215
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/72312
10.1186/1745-6215-12-53
2-s2.0-79951956492
2-s2.0-79951956492.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-53
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/72312
identifier_str_mv Trials, v. 12.
1745-6215
10.1186/1745-6215-12-53
2-s2.0-79951956492
2-s2.0-79951956492.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Trials
2.067
1,291
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965679164588032