The effects of alternative forced-molting methods on the performance and egg quality of commercial layers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Molino, AB [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Garcia, Edivaldo Antonio [UNESP], Berto, da [UNESP], Pelícia, K, Silva, AP [UNESP], Vercese, F [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2009000200006
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/14340
Resumo: This study aimed at studying alternative methods to induce molting and to compare them with the conventional forced-molting method (fasting). In the experiment, 420 70-week-old layers were used. The total experimental period was 140 days. Molting was induced during the first 28 days, when birds were submitted to the experimental treatments, and bird performance and egg quality parameters were determined during 112 subsequent days. A completely randomized experimental design was applied in a 5x2 factorial arrangement of five feed restriction regimes (0, 15, 30, 45, or 60g feed/bird/day) and with or without the addition of coarse-particle limestone to the feed, with seven replicates of six birds each. Egg quality was evaluated at the end of each 28-day period for three consecutive days, using three eggs per experimental unit (21 eggs/treatment), with a total of 210 eggs. It was concluded that feeding 15g feed/bird/day to induce molting is feasible, as birds submitted to this treatment presented similar performance and better egg quality than those submitted to fasting during molting. The use of coarse-particle limestone during molting did not influence post-molting bird performance or egg quality.
id UNSP_ba19e386af95c7a4d0a56e861a75fe4d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/14340
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling The effects of alternative forced-molting methods on the performance and egg quality of commercial layersEggshell thicknessfeed restrictionlimestonewelfareThis study aimed at studying alternative methods to induce molting and to compare them with the conventional forced-molting method (fasting). In the experiment, 420 70-week-old layers were used. The total experimental period was 140 days. Molting was induced during the first 28 days, when birds were submitted to the experimental treatments, and bird performance and egg quality parameters were determined during 112 subsequent days. A completely randomized experimental design was applied in a 5x2 factorial arrangement of five feed restriction regimes (0, 15, 30, 45, or 60g feed/bird/day) and with or without the addition of coarse-particle limestone to the feed, with seven replicates of six birds each. Egg quality was evaluated at the end of each 28-day period for three consecutive days, using three eggs per experimental unit (21 eggs/treatment), with a total of 210 eggs. It was concluded that feeding 15g feed/bird/day to induce molting is feasible, as birds submitted to this treatment presented similar performance and better egg quality than those submitted to fasting during molting. The use of coarse-particle limestone during molting did not influence post-molting bird performance or egg quality.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Unesp-Botucatu FMVZ Departamento de Produção AnimalUnesp-Botucatu FMVZ Department of Animal ProductionUnifenas Department of Animal ScienceUnesp-Botucatu FMVZ Departamento de Produção AnimalUnesp-Botucatu FMVZ Department of Animal ProductionFundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia AvícolasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Unifenas Department of Animal ScienceMolino, AB [UNESP]Garcia, Edivaldo Antonio [UNESP]Berto, da [UNESP]Pelícia, KSilva, AP [UNESP]Vercese, F [UNESP]2013-09-30T18:27:56Z2014-05-20T13:41:21Z2013-09-30T18:27:56Z2014-05-20T13:41:21Z2009-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article109-113application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2009000200006Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 11, n. 2, p. 109-113, 2009.1516-635Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/1434010.1590/S1516-635X2009000200006S1516-635X2009000200006WOS:000269654400006S1516-635X2009000200006.pdf67435913471067277728883010098049SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola0.463info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-30T06:20:04Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/14340Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-30T06:20:04Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effects of alternative forced-molting methods on the performance and egg quality of commercial layers
title The effects of alternative forced-molting methods on the performance and egg quality of commercial layers
spellingShingle The effects of alternative forced-molting methods on the performance and egg quality of commercial layers
Molino, AB [UNESP]
Eggshell thickness
feed restriction
limestone
welfare
title_short The effects of alternative forced-molting methods on the performance and egg quality of commercial layers
title_full The effects of alternative forced-molting methods on the performance and egg quality of commercial layers
title_fullStr The effects of alternative forced-molting methods on the performance and egg quality of commercial layers
title_full_unstemmed The effects of alternative forced-molting methods on the performance and egg quality of commercial layers
title_sort The effects of alternative forced-molting methods on the performance and egg quality of commercial layers
author Molino, AB [UNESP]
author_facet Molino, AB [UNESP]
Garcia, Edivaldo Antonio [UNESP]
Berto, da [UNESP]
Pelícia, K
Silva, AP [UNESP]
Vercese, F [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Garcia, Edivaldo Antonio [UNESP]
Berto, da [UNESP]
Pelícia, K
Silva, AP [UNESP]
Vercese, F [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Unifenas Department of Animal Science
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Molino, AB [UNESP]
Garcia, Edivaldo Antonio [UNESP]
Berto, da [UNESP]
Pelícia, K
Silva, AP [UNESP]
Vercese, F [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eggshell thickness
feed restriction
limestone
welfare
topic Eggshell thickness
feed restriction
limestone
welfare
description This study aimed at studying alternative methods to induce molting and to compare them with the conventional forced-molting method (fasting). In the experiment, 420 70-week-old layers were used. The total experimental period was 140 days. Molting was induced during the first 28 days, when birds were submitted to the experimental treatments, and bird performance and egg quality parameters were determined during 112 subsequent days. A completely randomized experimental design was applied in a 5x2 factorial arrangement of five feed restriction regimes (0, 15, 30, 45, or 60g feed/bird/day) and with or without the addition of coarse-particle limestone to the feed, with seven replicates of six birds each. Egg quality was evaluated at the end of each 28-day period for three consecutive days, using three eggs per experimental unit (21 eggs/treatment), with a total of 210 eggs. It was concluded that feeding 15g feed/bird/day to induce molting is feasible, as birds submitted to this treatment presented similar performance and better egg quality than those submitted to fasting during molting. The use of coarse-particle limestone during molting did not influence post-molting bird performance or egg quality.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-06-01
2013-09-30T18:27:56Z
2013-09-30T18:27:56Z
2014-05-20T13:41:21Z
2014-05-20T13:41:21Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2009000200006
Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 11, n. 2, p. 109-113, 2009.
1516-635X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/14340
10.1590/S1516-635X2009000200006
S1516-635X2009000200006
WOS:000269654400006
S1516-635X2009000200006.pdf
6743591347106727
7728883010098049
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2009000200006
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/14340
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 11, n. 2, p. 109-113, 2009.
1516-635X
10.1590/S1516-635X2009000200006
S1516-635X2009000200006
WOS:000269654400006
S1516-635X2009000200006.pdf
6743591347106727
7728883010098049
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola
0.463
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 109-113
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797790153788358656