Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickens

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Polycarpo, G. V. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Andretta, I., Kipper, M., Cruz-Polycarpo, V. C. [UNESP], Dadalt, J. C., Rodrigues, P. H.M., Albuquerque, R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex178
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177102
Resumo: The effect of organic acids as an alternative to antibiotics on the performance of broiler chickens was evaluated by meta-analysis, identifying and quantifying the main factors that influence results. A total of 51,960 broilers from 121 articles published between 1991 and 2016 were used. Interactions of additives [non-supplemented group (control), organic acids, and growth promoter antibiotics] with microbial challenge (with or without inoculation of pathogenic microorganisms) were studied on performance variables. Moreover, the effects of organic acids, used individually or in blends, were evaluated. Relative values of average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were obtained in relation to control: ΔADG and ΔADFI, respectively. Analysis of variance-covariance revealed lower ADG with organic acids when compared to antibiotics (P < 0.05). There was a significant interaction between the additives and the challenge on feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P < 0.01) and on viability (P < 0.05). Without challenge, organic acids improved broilers’ FCR (P < 0.01), presenting results similar to antibiotics (P > 0.05). Under challenge, the organic acids were again effective on FCR (−5.67% in relation to control, P < 0.05), but they did not match antibiotics (−13.40% in relation to control, P < 0.01). Viability was improved only under challenge conditions, and only by antibiotics (+4.39% in relation to control, P < 0.05). ADG (P < 0.05) and FCR (P < 0.01) were increased by blends of organic acids, but not by the organic acids used alone (P > 0.05). ADFI and production factor were not influenced by the treatments (P > 0.05). ΔADFI of organic-acid supplemented group showed a linear influence on ΔADG, which increases 0.64% at every 1% increase in ΔADFI. In conclusion, organic acids can be utilized as performance enhancing, but the results are lower than those found with antibiotics, particularly under microbial challenge. The blends of organic acids provide better results than the utilization of one organic acid alone.
id UNSP_baa8e53bfe96f662691b13c86f0c0d50
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/177102
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickensAdditiveAlternative to antibioticBroilerMeta-analysisOrganic acidThe effect of organic acids as an alternative to antibiotics on the performance of broiler chickens was evaluated by meta-analysis, identifying and quantifying the main factors that influence results. A total of 51,960 broilers from 121 articles published between 1991 and 2016 were used. Interactions of additives [non-supplemented group (control), organic acids, and growth promoter antibiotics] with microbial challenge (with or without inoculation of pathogenic microorganisms) were studied on performance variables. Moreover, the effects of organic acids, used individually or in blends, were evaluated. Relative values of average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were obtained in relation to control: ΔADG and ΔADFI, respectively. Analysis of variance-covariance revealed lower ADG with organic acids when compared to antibiotics (P < 0.05). There was a significant interaction between the additives and the challenge on feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P < 0.01) and on viability (P < 0.05). Without challenge, organic acids improved broilers’ FCR (P < 0.01), presenting results similar to antibiotics (P > 0.05). Under challenge, the organic acids were again effective on FCR (−5.67% in relation to control, P < 0.05), but they did not match antibiotics (−13.40% in relation to control, P < 0.01). Viability was improved only under challenge conditions, and only by antibiotics (+4.39% in relation to control, P < 0.05). ADG (P < 0.05) and FCR (P < 0.01) were increased by blends of organic acids, but not by the organic acids used alone (P > 0.05). ADFI and production factor were not influenced by the treatments (P > 0.05). ΔADFI of organic-acid supplemented group showed a linear influence on ΔADG, which increases 0.64% at every 1% increase in ΔADFI. In conclusion, organic acids can be utilized as performance enhancing, but the results are lower than those found with antibiotics, particularly under microbial challenge. The blends of organic acids provide better results than the utilization of one organic acid alone.São Paulo State University (UNESP) College of Agricultural and Technological SciencesFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul College of Agronomy Department of Animal Science Campus of PortoUniversity of São Paulo (USP) College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ) Department of Animal Nutrition and Production (VNP)São Paulo State University (UNESP) College of Agricultural and Technological SciencesUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Department of Animal ScienceUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Polycarpo, G. V. [UNESP]Andretta, I.Kipper, M.Cruz-Polycarpo, V. C. [UNESP]Dadalt, J. C.Rodrigues, P. H.M.Albuquerque, R.2018-12-11T17:24:00Z2018-12-11T17:24:00Z2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article3645-3653application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex178Poultry Science, v. 96, n. 10, p. 3645-3653, 2017.1525-31710032-5791http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17710210.3382/ps/pex1782-s2.0-850429156162-s2.0-85042915616.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPoultry Science1,112info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-28T06:21:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/177102Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-28T06:21:30Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickens
title Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickens
spellingShingle Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickens
Polycarpo, G. V. [UNESP]
Additive
Alternative to antibiotic
Broiler
Meta-analysis
Organic acid
title_short Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickens
title_full Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickens
title_fullStr Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickens
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickens
title_sort Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickens
author Polycarpo, G. V. [UNESP]
author_facet Polycarpo, G. V. [UNESP]
Andretta, I.
Kipper, M.
Cruz-Polycarpo, V. C. [UNESP]
Dadalt, J. C.
Rodrigues, P. H.M.
Albuquerque, R.
author_role author
author2 Andretta, I.
Kipper, M.
Cruz-Polycarpo, V. C. [UNESP]
Dadalt, J. C.
Rodrigues, P. H.M.
Albuquerque, R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Department of Animal Science
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Polycarpo, G. V. [UNESP]
Andretta, I.
Kipper, M.
Cruz-Polycarpo, V. C. [UNESP]
Dadalt, J. C.
Rodrigues, P. H.M.
Albuquerque, R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Additive
Alternative to antibiotic
Broiler
Meta-analysis
Organic acid
topic Additive
Alternative to antibiotic
Broiler
Meta-analysis
Organic acid
description The effect of organic acids as an alternative to antibiotics on the performance of broiler chickens was evaluated by meta-analysis, identifying and quantifying the main factors that influence results. A total of 51,960 broilers from 121 articles published between 1991 and 2016 were used. Interactions of additives [non-supplemented group (control), organic acids, and growth promoter antibiotics] with microbial challenge (with or without inoculation of pathogenic microorganisms) were studied on performance variables. Moreover, the effects of organic acids, used individually or in blends, were evaluated. Relative values of average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were obtained in relation to control: ΔADG and ΔADFI, respectively. Analysis of variance-covariance revealed lower ADG with organic acids when compared to antibiotics (P < 0.05). There was a significant interaction between the additives and the challenge on feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P < 0.01) and on viability (P < 0.05). Without challenge, organic acids improved broilers’ FCR (P < 0.01), presenting results similar to antibiotics (P > 0.05). Under challenge, the organic acids were again effective on FCR (−5.67% in relation to control, P < 0.05), but they did not match antibiotics (−13.40% in relation to control, P < 0.01). Viability was improved only under challenge conditions, and only by antibiotics (+4.39% in relation to control, P < 0.05). ADG (P < 0.05) and FCR (P < 0.01) were increased by blends of organic acids, but not by the organic acids used alone (P > 0.05). ADFI and production factor were not influenced by the treatments (P > 0.05). ΔADFI of organic-acid supplemented group showed a linear influence on ΔADG, which increases 0.64% at every 1% increase in ΔADFI. In conclusion, organic acids can be utilized as performance enhancing, but the results are lower than those found with antibiotics, particularly under microbial challenge. The blends of organic acids provide better results than the utilization of one organic acid alone.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
2018-12-11T17:24:00Z
2018-12-11T17:24:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex178
Poultry Science, v. 96, n. 10, p. 3645-3653, 2017.
1525-3171
0032-5791
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177102
10.3382/ps/pex178
2-s2.0-85042915616
2-s2.0-85042915616.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex178
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177102
identifier_str_mv Poultry Science, v. 96, n. 10, p. 3645-3653, 2017.
1525-3171
0032-5791
10.3382/ps/pex178
2-s2.0-85042915616
2-s2.0-85042915616.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Poultry Science
1,112
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 3645-3653
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965438753374208