Beta diversity of stream insects differs between boreal and subtropical regions, but land use does not generally cause biotic homogenization

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Petsch, Danielle K.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Saito, Victor S., Landeiro, Victor L., Silva, Thiago S. F., Bini, Luis M., Heino, Jani, Soininen, Janne, Tolonen, Kimmo T., Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Jenny, Pajunen, Virpi, Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP], Melo, Adriano S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/712565
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205566
Resumo: Previous studies have found mixed results regarding the relationship between beta diversity and latitude. In addition, by influencing local environmental heterogeneity, land use maymodify spatial taxonomic and functional variability among communities causing biotic differentiation or homogenization. We tested 1) whether taxonomic and functional beta diversities among streams within watersheds differ between subtropical and boreal regions and 2) whether land use is related to taxonomic and functional beta diversities in both regions.Wesampled aquatic insects in 100 subtropical (Brazil) and 100 boreal (Finland) streams across a wide gradient of land use, including agriculture and exotic planted, secondary, and native forests.We calculated beta diversity at thewatershed scale (among 5 streams in each watershed).We found higher taxonomic beta diversity among subtropical than among boreal streams,whereas functional beta diversity was similar between the 2 regions. Total land use was positively correlated with taxonomic and functional beta diversity among subtropical streams, while local environmental heterogeneity was positively correlated with beta diversity among boreal streams. We suggest that different types and intensities of land use may increase among-streamheterogeneity, promoting distinct insect assemblage compositions among streams. Our findings also suggest that beta diversity patterns and their underlying determinants are highly context dependent.
id UNSP_bdffb89ebb6999437e64d36ff61a67c5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205566
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Beta diversity of stream insects differs between boreal and subtropical regions, but land use does not generally cause biotic homogenizationAquatic insectsBiological traitsEnvironmental heterogeneityFunctional homogenizationLatitudinal diversity gradientPrevious studies have found mixed results regarding the relationship between beta diversity and latitude. In addition, by influencing local environmental heterogeneity, land use maymodify spatial taxonomic and functional variability among communities causing biotic differentiation or homogenization. We tested 1) whether taxonomic and functional beta diversities among streams within watersheds differ between subtropical and boreal regions and 2) whether land use is related to taxonomic and functional beta diversities in both regions.Wesampled aquatic insects in 100 subtropical (Brazil) and 100 boreal (Finland) streams across a wide gradient of land use, including agriculture and exotic planted, secondary, and native forests.We calculated beta diversity at thewatershed scale (among 5 streams in each watershed).We found higher taxonomic beta diversity among subtropical than among boreal streams,whereas functional beta diversity was similar between the 2 regions. Total land use was positively correlated with taxonomic and functional beta diversity among subtropical streams, while local environmental heterogeneity was positively correlated with beta diversity among boreal streams. We suggest that different types and intensities of land use may increase among-streamheterogeneity, promoting distinct insect assemblage compositions among streams. Our findings also suggest that beta diversity patterns and their underlying determinants are highly context dependent.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Evolução Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança, s/n, Térreo bloco ICB5, Câmpus SamambaiaDepartamento de Ciências Ambientais Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luis, km 235Departamento de Botânica e Ecologia Instituto de Biociências Universidade Federal de Mato GrossoBiological and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Natural Sciences University of StirlingDepartamento de Ecologia Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança, s/nFreshwater Centre Finnish Environment Institute University of Oulu, Oulu Office, P.O. Box 413Department of Geosciences and Geography University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, Yliopistonkatu 3Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista UNESP, Avenida 24-A 1515 Rio ClaroInstituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista UNESP, Avenida 24-A 1515 Rio ClaroUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Universidade Federal de Mato GrossoUniversity of StirlingUniversity of OuluUniversity of HelsinkiUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Petsch, Danielle K.Saito, Victor S.Landeiro, Victor L.Silva, Thiago S. F.Bini, Luis M.Heino, JaniSoininen, JanneTolonen, Kimmo T.Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, JennyPajunen, VirpiSiqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]Melo, Adriano S.2021-06-25T10:17:36Z2021-06-25T10:17:36Z2021-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article53-64http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/712565Freshwater Science, v. 40, n. 1, p. 53-64, 2021.2161-95652161-9549http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20556610.1086/7125652-s2.0-85097212818Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFreshwater Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T14:54:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205566Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T14:54:09Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Beta diversity of stream insects differs between boreal and subtropical regions, but land use does not generally cause biotic homogenization
title Beta diversity of stream insects differs between boreal and subtropical regions, but land use does not generally cause biotic homogenization
spellingShingle Beta diversity of stream insects differs between boreal and subtropical regions, but land use does not generally cause biotic homogenization
Petsch, Danielle K.
Aquatic insects
Biological traits
Environmental heterogeneity
Functional homogenization
Latitudinal diversity gradient
title_short Beta diversity of stream insects differs between boreal and subtropical regions, but land use does not generally cause biotic homogenization
title_full Beta diversity of stream insects differs between boreal and subtropical regions, but land use does not generally cause biotic homogenization
title_fullStr Beta diversity of stream insects differs between boreal and subtropical regions, but land use does not generally cause biotic homogenization
title_full_unstemmed Beta diversity of stream insects differs between boreal and subtropical regions, but land use does not generally cause biotic homogenization
title_sort Beta diversity of stream insects differs between boreal and subtropical regions, but land use does not generally cause biotic homogenization
author Petsch, Danielle K.
author_facet Petsch, Danielle K.
Saito, Victor S.
Landeiro, Victor L.
Silva, Thiago S. F.
Bini, Luis M.
Heino, Jani
Soininen, Janne
Tolonen, Kimmo T.
Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Jenny
Pajunen, Virpi
Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]
Melo, Adriano S.
author_role author
author2 Saito, Victor S.
Landeiro, Victor L.
Silva, Thiago S. F.
Bini, Luis M.
Heino, Jani
Soininen, Janne
Tolonen, Kimmo T.
Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Jenny
Pajunen, Virpi
Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]
Melo, Adriano S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
University of Stirling
University of Oulu
University of Helsinki
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Petsch, Danielle K.
Saito, Victor S.
Landeiro, Victor L.
Silva, Thiago S. F.
Bini, Luis M.
Heino, Jani
Soininen, Janne
Tolonen, Kimmo T.
Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Jenny
Pajunen, Virpi
Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]
Melo, Adriano S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aquatic insects
Biological traits
Environmental heterogeneity
Functional homogenization
Latitudinal diversity gradient
topic Aquatic insects
Biological traits
Environmental heterogeneity
Functional homogenization
Latitudinal diversity gradient
description Previous studies have found mixed results regarding the relationship between beta diversity and latitude. In addition, by influencing local environmental heterogeneity, land use maymodify spatial taxonomic and functional variability among communities causing biotic differentiation or homogenization. We tested 1) whether taxonomic and functional beta diversities among streams within watersheds differ between subtropical and boreal regions and 2) whether land use is related to taxonomic and functional beta diversities in both regions.Wesampled aquatic insects in 100 subtropical (Brazil) and 100 boreal (Finland) streams across a wide gradient of land use, including agriculture and exotic planted, secondary, and native forests.We calculated beta diversity at thewatershed scale (among 5 streams in each watershed).We found higher taxonomic beta diversity among subtropical than among boreal streams,whereas functional beta diversity was similar between the 2 regions. Total land use was positively correlated with taxonomic and functional beta diversity among subtropical streams, while local environmental heterogeneity was positively correlated with beta diversity among boreal streams. We suggest that different types and intensities of land use may increase among-streamheterogeneity, promoting distinct insect assemblage compositions among streams. Our findings also suggest that beta diversity patterns and their underlying determinants are highly context dependent.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:17:36Z
2021-06-25T10:17:36Z
2021-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/712565
Freshwater Science, v. 40, n. 1, p. 53-64, 2021.
2161-9565
2161-9549
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205566
10.1086/712565
2-s2.0-85097212818
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/712565
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205566
identifier_str_mv Freshwater Science, v. 40, n. 1, p. 53-64, 2021.
2161-9565
2161-9549
10.1086/712565
2-s2.0-85097212818
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Freshwater Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 53-64
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964967428947968

Registros relacionados