Violence and Moral Exclusion: Legitimizing Domestic Military Operations in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20988106 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205869 |
Resumo: | Many contemporary security issues entail the domestic military deployment, which is deemed to blur the division between armed forces and police. This argument relies on the theoretical coalescence between territory, political authority, and community. In contrast, I argue the military domestic deployment is largely grounded on the process of defining and redefining the boundaries of the community to be protected, which informs the organization of the instruments of force and is shaped throughout the process of legitimizing a particular kind of violence deployment. This article analyses the parliamentary minutes on three domestic military operations in Brazil—Operation Rio (1994), Operation Arcanjo (2010), and the Operation Rio de Janeiro (2017)—through the moral exclusion framework and shows that the debates about whether or not the armed forces should be deployed are embedded in the struggle of drawing the community’s boundaries. |
id |
UNSP_c64839a59d01a1b6e34a3413cbdc42e9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205869 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Violence and Moral Exclusion: Legitimizing Domestic Military Operations in Brazilcivil military relationsdefense policyinternational relationspolicingSouth Central AmericaMany contemporary security issues entail the domestic military deployment, which is deemed to blur the division between armed forces and police. This argument relies on the theoretical coalescence between territory, political authority, and community. In contrast, I argue the military domestic deployment is largely grounded on the process of defining and redefining the boundaries of the community to be protected, which informs the organization of the instruments of force and is shaped throughout the process of legitimizing a particular kind of violence deployment. This article analyses the parliamentary minutes on three domestic military operations in Brazil—Operation Rio (1994), Operation Arcanjo (2010), and the Operation Rio de Janeiro (2017)—through the moral exclusion framework and shows that the debates about whether or not the armed forces should be deployed are embedded in the struggle of drawing the community’s boundaries.Graduate School of International Relations São Paulo State University (UNESP)Graduate School of International Relations São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Junior, David P. Succi [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:22:37Z2021-06-25T10:22:37Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20988106Armed Forces and Society.0095-327Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/20586910.1177/0095327X209881062-s2.0-85100768302Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengArmed Forces and Societyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T19:10:56Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205869Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-22T19:10:56Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Violence and Moral Exclusion: Legitimizing Domestic Military Operations in Brazil |
title |
Violence and Moral Exclusion: Legitimizing Domestic Military Operations in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Violence and Moral Exclusion: Legitimizing Domestic Military Operations in Brazil Junior, David P. Succi [UNESP] civil military relations defense policy international relations policing South Central America |
title_short |
Violence and Moral Exclusion: Legitimizing Domestic Military Operations in Brazil |
title_full |
Violence and Moral Exclusion: Legitimizing Domestic Military Operations in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Violence and Moral Exclusion: Legitimizing Domestic Military Operations in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Violence and Moral Exclusion: Legitimizing Domestic Military Operations in Brazil |
title_sort |
Violence and Moral Exclusion: Legitimizing Domestic Military Operations in Brazil |
author |
Junior, David P. Succi [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Junior, David P. Succi [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Junior, David P. Succi [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
civil military relations defense policy international relations policing South Central America |
topic |
civil military relations defense policy international relations policing South Central America |
description |
Many contemporary security issues entail the domestic military deployment, which is deemed to blur the division between armed forces and police. This argument relies on the theoretical coalescence between territory, political authority, and community. In contrast, I argue the military domestic deployment is largely grounded on the process of defining and redefining the boundaries of the community to be protected, which informs the organization of the instruments of force and is shaped throughout the process of legitimizing a particular kind of violence deployment. This article analyses the parliamentary minutes on three domestic military operations in Brazil—Operation Rio (1994), Operation Arcanjo (2010), and the Operation Rio de Janeiro (2017)—through the moral exclusion framework and shows that the debates about whether or not the armed forces should be deployed are embedded in the struggle of drawing the community’s boundaries. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T10:22:37Z 2021-06-25T10:22:37Z 2021-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20988106 Armed Forces and Society. 0095-327X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205869 10.1177/0095327X20988106 2-s2.0-85100768302 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20988106 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205869 |
identifier_str_mv |
Armed Forces and Society. 0095-327X 10.1177/0095327X20988106 2-s2.0-85100768302 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Armed Forces and Society |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1797789572365549568 |