Performance of commercial laying hen submitted to different debeaking methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oka, C. H. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Bueno, Leda Gobbo de Freitas [UNESP], Souza, S. R.L. [UNESP], Balan, J. A.O. [UNESP], Silva, K. M. [UNESP], Polycarpo, G. V. [UNESP], Iwayama, L. H.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0537
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179470
Resumo: Among the several factors required in breeding laying hens, debeaking is a factor that interferes with batch performance and affects animal welfare. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate three different debeaking procedures and to verify the best technique to be used. For this, the performance of the birds, the incidence of cannibalism, and in rearing phase, the quality of the eggs were evaluated. Dekalb White birds were distributed in a completely randomized design with three treatments, T1 (infrared radiation debeaking) T2 (hot blade debeaking) and T3 (V debeaking).The data was submitted to Analysis of Variance and compared by Tukey’s test (95%), using statistical software R. The frequencies of mortality and cannibalism were submitted to the Chi-Square test (Software R). It was observed that mortality was lower with IR debeaking in the breeding phase. Already in the rearing phase, the mortality was similar between the debeaking techniques and the cannibalism was null. The final mean weight (g), mean weight gain (g) and average daily weight gain in the rearing and egg quality variables were higher for V debeaking when compared to other techniques. It is concluded that V-debeaking provides better bird performance, resistance and shell thickness when compared to the infrared radiations and hot blade debeaking, in addition to subjecting the birds to less stress.
id UNSP_c9359f4b9cd1040c806055f4eda0a34d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/179470
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Performance of commercial laying hen submitted to different debeaking methodsAnimal welfareBehaviorEgg qualityStressAmong the several factors required in breeding laying hens, debeaking is a factor that interferes with batch performance and affects animal welfare. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate three different debeaking procedures and to verify the best technique to be used. For this, the performance of the birds, the incidence of cannibalism, and in rearing phase, the quality of the eggs were evaluated. Dekalb White birds were distributed in a completely randomized design with three treatments, T1 (infrared radiation debeaking) T2 (hot blade debeaking) and T3 (V debeaking).The data was submitted to Analysis of Variance and compared by Tukey’s test (95%), using statistical software R. The frequencies of mortality and cannibalism were submitted to the Chi-Square test (Software R). It was observed that mortality was lower with IR debeaking in the breeding phase. Already in the rearing phase, the mortality was similar between the debeaking techniques and the cannibalism was null. The final mean weight (g), mean weight gain (g) and average daily weight gain in the rearing and egg quality variables were higher for V debeaking when compared to other techniques. It is concluded that V-debeaking provides better bird performance, resistance and shell thickness when compared to the infrared radiations and hot blade debeaking, in addition to subjecting the birds to less stress.São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” FCAT UnespSão Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” FCA UnespSão Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” FMVZ UnespHendrix Genetics LtdaSão Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” FCAT UnespSão Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” FCA UnespSão Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” FMVZ UnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Hendrix Genetics LtdaOka, C. H. [UNESP]Bueno, Leda Gobbo de Freitas [UNESP]Souza, S. R.L. [UNESP]Balan, J. A.O. [UNESP]Silva, K. M. [UNESP]Polycarpo, G. V. [UNESP]Iwayama, L. H.2018-12-11T17:35:19Z2018-12-11T17:35:19Z2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article717-724application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0537Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola, v. 19, n. 4, p. 717-724, 2017.1516-635Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/17947010.1590/1806-9061-2017-0537S1516-635X20170004007172-s2.0-85039698291S1516-635X2017000400717.pdf4017767689069749Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-02T06:07:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/179470Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-10-02T06:07:49Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance of commercial laying hen submitted to different debeaking methods
title Performance of commercial laying hen submitted to different debeaking methods
spellingShingle Performance of commercial laying hen submitted to different debeaking methods
Oka, C. H. [UNESP]
Animal welfare
Behavior
Egg quality
Stress
title_short Performance of commercial laying hen submitted to different debeaking methods
title_full Performance of commercial laying hen submitted to different debeaking methods
title_fullStr Performance of commercial laying hen submitted to different debeaking methods
title_full_unstemmed Performance of commercial laying hen submitted to different debeaking methods
title_sort Performance of commercial laying hen submitted to different debeaking methods
author Oka, C. H. [UNESP]
author_facet Oka, C. H. [UNESP]
Bueno, Leda Gobbo de Freitas [UNESP]
Souza, S. R.L. [UNESP]
Balan, J. A.O. [UNESP]
Silva, K. M. [UNESP]
Polycarpo, G. V. [UNESP]
Iwayama, L. H.
author_role author
author2 Bueno, Leda Gobbo de Freitas [UNESP]
Souza, S. R.L. [UNESP]
Balan, J. A.O. [UNESP]
Silva, K. M. [UNESP]
Polycarpo, G. V. [UNESP]
Iwayama, L. H.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Hendrix Genetics Ltda
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oka, C. H. [UNESP]
Bueno, Leda Gobbo de Freitas [UNESP]
Souza, S. R.L. [UNESP]
Balan, J. A.O. [UNESP]
Silva, K. M. [UNESP]
Polycarpo, G. V. [UNESP]
Iwayama, L. H.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Animal welfare
Behavior
Egg quality
Stress
topic Animal welfare
Behavior
Egg quality
Stress
description Among the several factors required in breeding laying hens, debeaking is a factor that interferes with batch performance and affects animal welfare. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate three different debeaking procedures and to verify the best technique to be used. For this, the performance of the birds, the incidence of cannibalism, and in rearing phase, the quality of the eggs were evaluated. Dekalb White birds were distributed in a completely randomized design with three treatments, T1 (infrared radiation debeaking) T2 (hot blade debeaking) and T3 (V debeaking).The data was submitted to Analysis of Variance and compared by Tukey’s test (95%), using statistical software R. The frequencies of mortality and cannibalism were submitted to the Chi-Square test (Software R). It was observed that mortality was lower with IR debeaking in the breeding phase. Already in the rearing phase, the mortality was similar between the debeaking techniques and the cannibalism was null. The final mean weight (g), mean weight gain (g) and average daily weight gain in the rearing and egg quality variables were higher for V debeaking when compared to other techniques. It is concluded that V-debeaking provides better bird performance, resistance and shell thickness when compared to the infrared radiations and hot blade debeaking, in addition to subjecting the birds to less stress.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
2018-12-11T17:35:19Z
2018-12-11T17:35:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0537
Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola, v. 19, n. 4, p. 717-724, 2017.
1516-635X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179470
10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0537
S1516-635X2017000400717
2-s2.0-85039698291
S1516-635X2017000400717.pdf
4017767689069749
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0537
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179470
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola, v. 19, n. 4, p. 717-724, 2017.
1516-635X
10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0537
S1516-635X2017000400717
2-s2.0-85039698291
S1516-635X2017000400717.pdf
4017767689069749
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 717-724
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1792961443258171392