Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Novaes, José Luís Costa
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Carvalho, Edmir Daniel [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252013005000002
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/76090
Resumo: We compared the artisanal fisheries, in terms of catch strategies, productivity, and gross per capita income, at two reservoirs: The Barra Bonita (an eutrophic reservoir with some introduced species), and the Jurumirim (an oligotrophic reservoir, with no introduced species). Published data and structured interviews with fishers were used to evaluate fishing activity, fish biomass, and the financial performance of the fisheries. In the Barra Bonita Reservoir we analysed data from 745 fishing trips, from which 86,691.9 kg of fish were landed, with a mean CPUE of 62.4 kg/fisher-1 day-1. The main type of fish caught was tilapia (71,513.5 kg; CPUE of 51.5 kg/fisher-1 day-1), which constituted 82.5% of the biomass caught. In the Jurumirim Reservoir, we analysed data from 2,401 fishing trips, from which 25,093.6 kg of fish were landed, with a mean CPUE of 10.4 kg/fisher-1 day-1. The main type of fish caught was traíra (6,158.6 kg; CPUE of 2.6 kg/fisher-1 day-1), which constituted 24.5% of the biomass caught. Ordination analysis (PCA) indicated that there was a difference in composition between the fishing reservoirs and ANCOVA showed that there was a significant difference in fish production between the reservoirs. A Student's t-test showed that fishers in the Barra Bonita Reservoir had a significantly higher gross per capita income than those from the Jurumirim Reservoir. Although the Barra Bonita Reservoir has a higher fish production and the fishers earn a higher gross per capita income, we recommend the Jurumirim Reservoir as a model for artisanal fishery management because fishing activity in this reservoir is viable in the long term and such a model would promote conservation and sustainability. This contrasts with the Barra Bonita Reservoir, in which the fishery is not viable in the long term, due to environmental problems caused by artificial eutrophication and the introduction of alien species. It is also noted that in many countries, management of fisheries based on exotic species has not been viable in the long term. © 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia.
id UNSP_caea057c5756909987e50a23e84b1401
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/76090
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)Barra Bonita ReservoirFishJurumirim ReservoirParanapanema RiverTietê RiverWe compared the artisanal fisheries, in terms of catch strategies, productivity, and gross per capita income, at two reservoirs: The Barra Bonita (an eutrophic reservoir with some introduced species), and the Jurumirim (an oligotrophic reservoir, with no introduced species). Published data and structured interviews with fishers were used to evaluate fishing activity, fish biomass, and the financial performance of the fisheries. In the Barra Bonita Reservoir we analysed data from 745 fishing trips, from which 86,691.9 kg of fish were landed, with a mean CPUE of 62.4 kg/fisher-1 day-1. The main type of fish caught was tilapia (71,513.5 kg; CPUE of 51.5 kg/fisher-1 day-1), which constituted 82.5% of the biomass caught. In the Jurumirim Reservoir, we analysed data from 2,401 fishing trips, from which 25,093.6 kg of fish were landed, with a mean CPUE of 10.4 kg/fisher-1 day-1. The main type of fish caught was traíra (6,158.6 kg; CPUE of 2.6 kg/fisher-1 day-1), which constituted 24.5% of the biomass caught. Ordination analysis (PCA) indicated that there was a difference in composition between the fishing reservoirs and ANCOVA showed that there was a significant difference in fish production between the reservoirs. A Student's t-test showed that fishers in the Barra Bonita Reservoir had a significantly higher gross per capita income than those from the Jurumirim Reservoir. Although the Barra Bonita Reservoir has a higher fish production and the fishers earn a higher gross per capita income, we recommend the Jurumirim Reservoir as a model for artisanal fishery management because fishing activity in this reservoir is viable in the long term and such a model would promote conservation and sustainability. This contrasts with the Barra Bonita Reservoir, in which the fishery is not viable in the long term, due to environmental problems caused by artificial eutrophication and the introduction of alien species. It is also noted that in many countries, management of fisheries based on exotic species has not been viable in the long term. © 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia.Departamento de ZoologiaBrazilian governmentDepartamento de Morfologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, campus BotucatuUniversidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido - UFERSA Departamento de Ciências Animais, Av. Francisco Mota, 572, Costa e Silva, 59625-900 Mossoró, RNUniversidade Estadual Paulista 'Julio de Mesquita Filho'- UNESP Departamento de Morfologia Instituto de Biociências, Distrito de Rubião Jr., 18618-970 Botucatu, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista 'Julio de Mesquita Filho'- UNESP Departamento de Morfologia Instituto de Biociências, Distrito de Rubião Jr., 18618-970 Botucatu, SPUniversidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Novaes, José Luís CostaCarvalho, Edmir Daniel [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:30:04Z2014-05-27T11:30:04Z2013-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article403-412application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252013005000002Neotropical Ichthyology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 403-412, 2013.1679-6225http://hdl.handle.net/11449/7609010.1590/S1679-62252013005000002S1679-62252013005000002WOS:0003225350000192-s2.0-848806872372-s2.0-84880687237.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengNeotropical Ichthyology1.2160,559info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-28T06:06:16Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/76090Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-10-28T06:06:16Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)
title Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)
spellingShingle Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)
Novaes, José Luís Costa
Barra Bonita Reservoir
Fish
Jurumirim Reservoir
Paranapanema River
Tietê River
title_short Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)
title_full Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)
title_fullStr Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)
title_sort Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)
author Novaes, José Luís Costa
author_facet Novaes, José Luís Costa
Carvalho, Edmir Daniel [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Edmir Daniel [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Novaes, José Luís Costa
Carvalho, Edmir Daniel [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Barra Bonita Reservoir
Fish
Jurumirim Reservoir
Paranapanema River
Tietê River
topic Barra Bonita Reservoir
Fish
Jurumirim Reservoir
Paranapanema River
Tietê River
description We compared the artisanal fisheries, in terms of catch strategies, productivity, and gross per capita income, at two reservoirs: The Barra Bonita (an eutrophic reservoir with some introduced species), and the Jurumirim (an oligotrophic reservoir, with no introduced species). Published data and structured interviews with fishers were used to evaluate fishing activity, fish biomass, and the financial performance of the fisheries. In the Barra Bonita Reservoir we analysed data from 745 fishing trips, from which 86,691.9 kg of fish were landed, with a mean CPUE of 62.4 kg/fisher-1 day-1. The main type of fish caught was tilapia (71,513.5 kg; CPUE of 51.5 kg/fisher-1 day-1), which constituted 82.5% of the biomass caught. In the Jurumirim Reservoir, we analysed data from 2,401 fishing trips, from which 25,093.6 kg of fish were landed, with a mean CPUE of 10.4 kg/fisher-1 day-1. The main type of fish caught was traíra (6,158.6 kg; CPUE of 2.6 kg/fisher-1 day-1), which constituted 24.5% of the biomass caught. Ordination analysis (PCA) indicated that there was a difference in composition between the fishing reservoirs and ANCOVA showed that there was a significant difference in fish production between the reservoirs. A Student's t-test showed that fishers in the Barra Bonita Reservoir had a significantly higher gross per capita income than those from the Jurumirim Reservoir. Although the Barra Bonita Reservoir has a higher fish production and the fishers earn a higher gross per capita income, we recommend the Jurumirim Reservoir as a model for artisanal fishery management because fishing activity in this reservoir is viable in the long term and such a model would promote conservation and sustainability. This contrasts with the Barra Bonita Reservoir, in which the fishery is not viable in the long term, due to environmental problems caused by artificial eutrophication and the introduction of alien species. It is also noted that in many countries, management of fisheries based on exotic species has not been viable in the long term. © 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-07-31
2014-05-27T11:30:04Z
2014-05-27T11:30:04Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252013005000002
Neotropical Ichthyology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 403-412, 2013.
1679-6225
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/76090
10.1590/S1679-62252013005000002
S1679-62252013005000002
WOS:000322535000019
2-s2.0-84880687237
2-s2.0-84880687237.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252013005000002
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/76090
identifier_str_mv Neotropical Ichthyology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 403-412, 2013.
1679-6225
10.1590/S1679-62252013005000002
S1679-62252013005000002
WOS:000322535000019
2-s2.0-84880687237
2-s2.0-84880687237.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Neotropical Ichthyology
1.216
0,559
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 403-412
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797789535148441600