Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Da Silveira, Ricardo Z.M. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Campeiro, Leandro M. [UNESP], Baptista, Fabricio G. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174108
Resumo: In recent years, piezoelectric sensors have been used in many non-destructive methods for detection of structural damage in structural health monitoring (SHM) systems, including the electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique. The classic method to install the sensor in the structure to be monitored is using a high stiffness adhesive. However, many studies have proposed alternative methods of sensor installation. Thus, the purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative experimental analysis of the main installation methods of the sensors in the electromechanical impedance technique, which are the direct installation, the magnetic coupling, and using aluminum foils. Tests with the three installation methods were carried out on aluminum structures and the results were compared using the electrical impedance signatures and damage indices. The experimental results indicate important features of each method relative to the feasibility for detection of structural damage.
id UNSP_d71011a27bca295068f4834013a74b45
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174108
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applicationscouplingimpedanceinstallationpiezoelectric transducersSHMIn recent years, piezoelectric sensors have been used in many non-destructive methods for detection of structural damage in structural health monitoring (SHM) systems, including the electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique. The classic method to install the sensor in the structure to be monitored is using a high stiffness adhesive. However, many studies have proposed alternative methods of sensor installation. Thus, the purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative experimental analysis of the main installation methods of the sensors in the electromechanical impedance technique, which are the direct installation, the magnetic coupling, and using aluminum foils. Tests with the three installation methods were carried out on aluminum structures and the results were compared using the electrical impedance signatures and damage indices. The experimental results indicate important features of each method relative to the feasibility for detection of structural damage.Faculdade de Engenharia UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista Bauru Departamento de Engenharia ElétricaFaculdade de Engenharia UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista Bauru Departamento de Engenharia ElétricaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Da Silveira, Ricardo Z.M. [UNESP]Campeiro, Leandro M. [UNESP]Baptista, Fabricio G. [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:09:22Z2018-12-11T17:09:22Z2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject1751-1754http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506Procedia Engineering, v. 168, p. 1751-1754.1877-7058http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17410810.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.5062-s2.0-85009973173Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengProcedia Engineering0,282info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T21:44:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174108Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T21:44:24Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications
title Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications
spellingShingle Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications
Da Silveira, Ricardo Z.M. [UNESP]
coupling
impedance
installation
piezoelectric transducers
SHM
title_short Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications
title_full Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications
title_fullStr Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications
title_sort Analysis of Sensor Installation Methods in Impedance-based SHM Applications
author Da Silveira, Ricardo Z.M. [UNESP]
author_facet Da Silveira, Ricardo Z.M. [UNESP]
Campeiro, Leandro M. [UNESP]
Baptista, Fabricio G. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Campeiro, Leandro M. [UNESP]
Baptista, Fabricio G. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Da Silveira, Ricardo Z.M. [UNESP]
Campeiro, Leandro M. [UNESP]
Baptista, Fabricio G. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv coupling
impedance
installation
piezoelectric transducers
SHM
topic coupling
impedance
installation
piezoelectric transducers
SHM
description In recent years, piezoelectric sensors have been used in many non-destructive methods for detection of structural damage in structural health monitoring (SHM) systems, including the electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique. The classic method to install the sensor in the structure to be monitored is using a high stiffness adhesive. However, many studies have proposed alternative methods of sensor installation. Thus, the purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative experimental analysis of the main installation methods of the sensors in the electromechanical impedance technique, which are the direct installation, the magnetic coupling, and using aluminum foils. Tests with the three installation methods were carried out on aluminum structures and the results were compared using the electrical impedance signatures and damage indices. The experimental results indicate important features of each method relative to the feasibility for detection of structural damage.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
2018-12-11T17:09:22Z
2018-12-11T17:09:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506
Procedia Engineering, v. 168, p. 1751-1754.
1877-7058
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174108
10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506
2-s2.0-85009973173
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174108
identifier_str_mv Procedia Engineering, v. 168, p. 1751-1754.
1877-7058
10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.506
2-s2.0-85009973173
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Procedia Engineering
0,282
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1751-1754
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797790309421154304

Registros relacionados