Comparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.18830 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/68559 |
Resumo: | The sugar cane crop is one of the main products in Brazil and according to several authors can generate, besides the industrialized stalks, an amount of crop residues from the order of 15 to 30 % in weight of the aerial part of the plants, depending on the field conditions. The sugar cane area in Brazil is around 5.5×106 hectares, with an amount of 400.106 tons of stalks, with stalks yield of 72 tons.ha-1. This study took place in a sugar cane plot (Latitude 22°46'S, Longitude 47°23'W and 600m of altitude) with 3% of slope, located in São Paulo State. The sugar cane variety was SP 80-1816, in its forth cut, 11 months old and with a planted row spacing of 1.40 m. By other side, several sugar mills are bringing the crop residue to their patio to produce energy with the bagasse. One choice is to bring the crop residue at the same moment with the stalks, avoiding the next operation of baling it. The objective of this study was to analyze some operational parameters of two different sugar cane harvesters under the same field conditions, which was divided in four treatments: T1 = CAMECO CHT2500B operating normally; T2 = CAMECO CHT2500B operating without the cleaning system; T3 = CASE 7700 operating normally; T4 = CASE 7700 operating without the cleaning system. The results obtained were: Table presented CEB = Gross effective capacity; CEL = Net effective capacity. The conclusion is that under normal operation the CASE harvester worked better then CAMECO in the parameters CEL stalks and Manipulation efficiency. And without the cleaning system operating CASE also worked better in the parameters of CEB raw material, CEB stalks, CEL raw material and CEL stalks. |
id |
UNSP_e123d9e3940b8bedb10c94bff029fd08 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/68559 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in BrazilCrop residueHarvestingMechanizationSugar caneAerial partsCleaning systemEffective capacityField conditionsField testNormal operationsOperational conditionsOperational parametersRow spacingSaccharum sppSugar millsAgricultural wastesCropsHarvestersMachinerySugar (sucrose)Sugar factoriesSugarsThe sugar cane crop is one of the main products in Brazil and according to several authors can generate, besides the industrialized stalks, an amount of crop residues from the order of 15 to 30 % in weight of the aerial part of the plants, depending on the field conditions. The sugar cane area in Brazil is around 5.5×106 hectares, with an amount of 400.106 tons of stalks, with stalks yield of 72 tons.ha-1. This study took place in a sugar cane plot (Latitude 22°46'S, Longitude 47°23'W and 600m of altitude) with 3% of slope, located in São Paulo State. The sugar cane variety was SP 80-1816, in its forth cut, 11 months old and with a planted row spacing of 1.40 m. By other side, several sugar mills are bringing the crop residue to their patio to produce energy with the bagasse. One choice is to bring the crop residue at the same moment with the stalks, avoiding the next operation of baling it. The objective of this study was to analyze some operational parameters of two different sugar cane harvesters under the same field conditions, which was divided in four treatments: T1 = CAMECO CHT2500B operating normally; T2 = CAMECO CHT2500B operating without the cleaning system; T3 = CASE 7700 operating normally; T4 = CASE 7700 operating without the cleaning system. The results obtained were: Table presented CEB = Gross effective capacity; CEL = Net effective capacity. The conclusion is that under normal operation the CASE harvester worked better then CAMECO in the parameters CEL stalks and Manipulation efficiency. And without the cleaning system operating CASE also worked better in the parameters of CEB raw material, CEB stalks, CEL raw material and CEL stalks.UNESP Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias, Botucatu, SPESALQ Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SPUNESP Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias, Botucatu, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Ripoli, M. L C [UNESP]Ripoli, T. C CGamero, Carlos Antonio [UNESP]De, S. M.2014-05-27T11:21:42Z2014-05-27T11:21:42Z2005-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.188302005 ASAE Annual International Meeting.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/6855910.13031/2013.188302-s2.0-703491225541957087099988521Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPeng2005 ASAE Annual International Meetinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T21:37:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/68559Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T21:37:55Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in Brazil |
title |
Comparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Comparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in Brazil Ripoli, M. L C [UNESP] Crop residue Harvesting Mechanization Sugar cane Aerial parts Cleaning system Effective capacity Field conditions Field test Normal operations Operational conditions Operational parameters Row spacing Saccharum spp Sugar mills Agricultural wastes Crops Harvesters Machinery Sugar (sucrose) Sugar factories Sugars |
title_short |
Comparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in Brazil |
title_full |
Comparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Comparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in Brazil |
title_sort |
Comparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in Brazil |
author |
Ripoli, M. L C [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Ripoli, M. L C [UNESP] Ripoli, T. C C Gamero, Carlos Antonio [UNESP] De, S. M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ripoli, T. C C Gamero, Carlos Antonio [UNESP] De, S. M. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ripoli, M. L C [UNESP] Ripoli, T. C C Gamero, Carlos Antonio [UNESP] De, S. M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Crop residue Harvesting Mechanization Sugar cane Aerial parts Cleaning system Effective capacity Field conditions Field test Normal operations Operational conditions Operational parameters Row spacing Saccharum spp Sugar mills Agricultural wastes Crops Harvesters Machinery Sugar (sucrose) Sugar factories Sugars |
topic |
Crop residue Harvesting Mechanization Sugar cane Aerial parts Cleaning system Effective capacity Field conditions Field test Normal operations Operational conditions Operational parameters Row spacing Saccharum spp Sugar mills Agricultural wastes Crops Harvesters Machinery Sugar (sucrose) Sugar factories Sugars |
description |
The sugar cane crop is one of the main products in Brazil and according to several authors can generate, besides the industrialized stalks, an amount of crop residues from the order of 15 to 30 % in weight of the aerial part of the plants, depending on the field conditions. The sugar cane area in Brazil is around 5.5×106 hectares, with an amount of 400.106 tons of stalks, with stalks yield of 72 tons.ha-1. This study took place in a sugar cane plot (Latitude 22°46'S, Longitude 47°23'W and 600m of altitude) with 3% of slope, located in São Paulo State. The sugar cane variety was SP 80-1816, in its forth cut, 11 months old and with a planted row spacing of 1.40 m. By other side, several sugar mills are bringing the crop residue to their patio to produce energy with the bagasse. One choice is to bring the crop residue at the same moment with the stalks, avoiding the next operation of baling it. The objective of this study was to analyze some operational parameters of two different sugar cane harvesters under the same field conditions, which was divided in four treatments: T1 = CAMECO CHT2500B operating normally; T2 = CAMECO CHT2500B operating without the cleaning system; T3 = CASE 7700 operating normally; T4 = CASE 7700 operating without the cleaning system. The results obtained were: Table presented CEB = Gross effective capacity; CEL = Net effective capacity. The conclusion is that under normal operation the CASE harvester worked better then CAMECO in the parameters CEL stalks and Manipulation efficiency. And without the cleaning system operating CASE also worked better in the parameters of CEB raw material, CEB stalks, CEL raw material and CEL stalks. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-12-01 2014-05-27T11:21:42Z 2014-05-27T11:21:42Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.18830 2005 ASAE Annual International Meeting. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/68559 10.13031/2013.18830 2-s2.0-70349122554 1957087099988521 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.18830 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/68559 |
identifier_str_mv |
2005 ASAE Annual International Meeting. 10.13031/2013.18830 2-s2.0-70349122554 1957087099988521 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2005 ASAE Annual International Meeting |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1797790414909997056 |