Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Rodrigo O [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cooke, Reinaldo F, Firmino, Franciele C [UNESP], Moura, Mayara K. R [UNESP], Angeli, Beatriz F [UNESP], Ferreira, Hingryd A. O [UNESP], Brandão, Alice P, Gex-Fabry, M, Ostrensky, A, Vasconcelos, Jose L. M [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz108
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198832
Resumo: This experiment compared milk production, milk composition, and physiological responses in lactating dairy cows supplemented with or without a mixture of condensed tannins, encapsulated cinnamaldehyde, curcumin, capsaicin, and piperine. Thirty-six lactating, multiparous, pregnant 3/4 Holstein × 1.4 Gir cows were maintained in a single drylot pen with ad libitum access to water and a total-mixed ration and were milked twice daily (d -7 to 84). On d 0, cows were ranked by days in milk (86 ± 3 d), milk yield (27.8 ± 1.0 kg), body weight (BW; 584 ± 10 kg), and body condition score (BCS; 3.04 ± 0.06) and assigned to receive (SUPP; n = 18) or not (CON; n = 18) 30 g/cow daily (as-fed basis) of Actifor Pro (Delacon Biotechnik GmbH; Steyregg, Austria). From d 0 to 84, SUPP cows individually received (as-fed basis) 15 g of Actifor Pro mixed with 85 g of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates before each milking of the day. Each CON cow concurrently received 85 g (as-fed basis) of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates. Throughout the experimental period (d -7 to 84), cows from both treatments were administered 500 mg of sometribove zinc at 14-d intervals and were monitored daily for morbidity, including clinical mastitis. Individual milk production was recorded daily, whereas milk samples were collected weekly for analysis of milk composition. Cow BW, BCS, and blood samples were also collected weekly. Cows receiving SUPP gained more BCS (P = 0.05) and had greater (P = 0.04) milk yield during the experiment compared with CON cows (0.22 vs. 0.07 of BCS, SEM = 0.05; 29.5 vs. 27.9 kg/d, SEM = 0.5). Milk composition did not differ (P ≥ 0.15) between SUPP and CON cows; hence, SUPP cows also had greater (P ≤ 0.02) production of fat-corrected and energy-corrected milk. Incidence of clinical mastitis did not differ (P ≥ 0.49) between SUPP and CON cows. No treatment differences were also detected (P ≥ 0.21) for serum concentrations of glucose and serum urea N. Mean serum haptoglobin concentration during the experiment was greater (P = 0.05) in CON vs. SUPP cows. Cows receiving SUPP had less (P ≤ 0.04) serum cortisol concentrations on d 21 and 42, and greater (P ≤ 0.05) serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I on d 7, 35, and 63 compared with CON cows (treatment × day interactions; P ≤ 0.02). Collectively, supplementing phytogenic feed ingredients improved nutritional status and milk production of lactating 3/4 Holstein × 1/4 Gir cows.
id UNSP_e4980e5fd38a00df3f0c7ca1a548577b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198832
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredientsdairy cattlemilk productionphysiologyphytogenic ingredientssupplementationThis experiment compared milk production, milk composition, and physiological responses in lactating dairy cows supplemented with or without a mixture of condensed tannins, encapsulated cinnamaldehyde, curcumin, capsaicin, and piperine. Thirty-six lactating, multiparous, pregnant 3/4 Holstein × 1.4 Gir cows were maintained in a single drylot pen with ad libitum access to water and a total-mixed ration and were milked twice daily (d -7 to 84). On d 0, cows were ranked by days in milk (86 ± 3 d), milk yield (27.8 ± 1.0 kg), body weight (BW; 584 ± 10 kg), and body condition score (BCS; 3.04 ± 0.06) and assigned to receive (SUPP; n = 18) or not (CON; n = 18) 30 g/cow daily (as-fed basis) of Actifor Pro (Delacon Biotechnik GmbH; Steyregg, Austria). From d 0 to 84, SUPP cows individually received (as-fed basis) 15 g of Actifor Pro mixed with 85 g of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates before each milking of the day. Each CON cow concurrently received 85 g (as-fed basis) of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates. Throughout the experimental period (d -7 to 84), cows from both treatments were administered 500 mg of sometribove zinc at 14-d intervals and were monitored daily for morbidity, including clinical mastitis. Individual milk production was recorded daily, whereas milk samples were collected weekly for analysis of milk composition. Cow BW, BCS, and blood samples were also collected weekly. Cows receiving SUPP gained more BCS (P = 0.05) and had greater (P = 0.04) milk yield during the experiment compared with CON cows (0.22 vs. 0.07 of BCS, SEM = 0.05; 29.5 vs. 27.9 kg/d, SEM = 0.5). Milk composition did not differ (P ≥ 0.15) between SUPP and CON cows; hence, SUPP cows also had greater (P ≤ 0.02) production of fat-corrected and energy-corrected milk. Incidence of clinical mastitis did not differ (P ≥ 0.49) between SUPP and CON cows. No treatment differences were also detected (P ≥ 0.21) for serum concentrations of glucose and serum urea N. Mean serum haptoglobin concentration during the experiment was greater (P = 0.05) in CON vs. SUPP cows. Cows receiving SUPP had less (P ≤ 0.04) serum cortisol concentrations on d 21 and 42, and greater (P ≤ 0.05) serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I on d 7, 35, and 63 compared with CON cows (treatment × day interactions; P ≤ 0.02). Collectively, supplementing phytogenic feed ingredients improved nutritional status and milk production of lactating 3/4 Holstein × 1/4 Gir cows.School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Animal Science Texas AandM UniversityDelacon Biotechnik GmbHSchool of Life Sciences Pontifical Catholic University of ParanáSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Texas AandM UniversityDelacon Biotechnik GmbHPontifical Catholic University of ParanáRodrigues, Rodrigo O [UNESP]Cooke, Reinaldo FFirmino, Franciele C [UNESP]Moura, Mayara K. R [UNESP]Angeli, Beatriz F [UNESP]Ferreira, Hingryd A. O [UNESP]Brandão, Alice PGex-Fabry, MOstrensky, AVasconcelos, Jose L. M [UNESP]2020-12-12T01:23:10Z2020-12-12T01:23:10Z2019-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article133-1142http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz108Translational Animal Science, v. 3, n. 4, p. 133-1142, 2019.2573-2102http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19883210.1093/tas/txz1082-s2.0-85084673059Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengTranslational Animal Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T20:36:23Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198832Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-22T20:36:23Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients
title Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients
spellingShingle Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients
Rodrigues, Rodrigo O [UNESP]
dairy cattle
milk production
physiology
phytogenic ingredients
supplementation
title_short Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients
title_full Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients
title_fullStr Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients
title_full_unstemmed Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients
title_sort Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients
author Rodrigues, Rodrigo O [UNESP]
author_facet Rodrigues, Rodrigo O [UNESP]
Cooke, Reinaldo F
Firmino, Franciele C [UNESP]
Moura, Mayara K. R [UNESP]
Angeli, Beatriz F [UNESP]
Ferreira, Hingryd A. O [UNESP]
Brandão, Alice P
Gex-Fabry, M
Ostrensky, A
Vasconcelos, Jose L. M [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Cooke, Reinaldo F
Firmino, Franciele C [UNESP]
Moura, Mayara K. R [UNESP]
Angeli, Beatriz F [UNESP]
Ferreira, Hingryd A. O [UNESP]
Brandão, Alice P
Gex-Fabry, M
Ostrensky, A
Vasconcelos, Jose L. M [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Texas AandM University
Delacon Biotechnik GmbH
Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Rodrigo O [UNESP]
Cooke, Reinaldo F
Firmino, Franciele C [UNESP]
Moura, Mayara K. R [UNESP]
Angeli, Beatriz F [UNESP]
Ferreira, Hingryd A. O [UNESP]
Brandão, Alice P
Gex-Fabry, M
Ostrensky, A
Vasconcelos, Jose L. M [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv dairy cattle
milk production
physiology
phytogenic ingredients
supplementation
topic dairy cattle
milk production
physiology
phytogenic ingredients
supplementation
description This experiment compared milk production, milk composition, and physiological responses in lactating dairy cows supplemented with or without a mixture of condensed tannins, encapsulated cinnamaldehyde, curcumin, capsaicin, and piperine. Thirty-six lactating, multiparous, pregnant 3/4 Holstein × 1.4 Gir cows were maintained in a single drylot pen with ad libitum access to water and a total-mixed ration and were milked twice daily (d -7 to 84). On d 0, cows were ranked by days in milk (86 ± 3 d), milk yield (27.8 ± 1.0 kg), body weight (BW; 584 ± 10 kg), and body condition score (BCS; 3.04 ± 0.06) and assigned to receive (SUPP; n = 18) or not (CON; n = 18) 30 g/cow daily (as-fed basis) of Actifor Pro (Delacon Biotechnik GmbH; Steyregg, Austria). From d 0 to 84, SUPP cows individually received (as-fed basis) 15 g of Actifor Pro mixed with 85 g of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates before each milking of the day. Each CON cow concurrently received 85 g (as-fed basis) of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates. Throughout the experimental period (d -7 to 84), cows from both treatments were administered 500 mg of sometribove zinc at 14-d intervals and were monitored daily for morbidity, including clinical mastitis. Individual milk production was recorded daily, whereas milk samples were collected weekly for analysis of milk composition. Cow BW, BCS, and blood samples were also collected weekly. Cows receiving SUPP gained more BCS (P = 0.05) and had greater (P = 0.04) milk yield during the experiment compared with CON cows (0.22 vs. 0.07 of BCS, SEM = 0.05; 29.5 vs. 27.9 kg/d, SEM = 0.5). Milk composition did not differ (P ≥ 0.15) between SUPP and CON cows; hence, SUPP cows also had greater (P ≤ 0.02) production of fat-corrected and energy-corrected milk. Incidence of clinical mastitis did not differ (P ≥ 0.49) between SUPP and CON cows. No treatment differences were also detected (P ≥ 0.21) for serum concentrations of glucose and serum urea N. Mean serum haptoglobin concentration during the experiment was greater (P = 0.05) in CON vs. SUPP cows. Cows receiving SUPP had less (P ≤ 0.04) serum cortisol concentrations on d 21 and 42, and greater (P ≤ 0.05) serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I on d 7, 35, and 63 compared with CON cows (treatment × day interactions; P ≤ 0.02). Collectively, supplementing phytogenic feed ingredients improved nutritional status and milk production of lactating 3/4 Holstein × 1/4 Gir cows.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-01
2020-12-12T01:23:10Z
2020-12-12T01:23:10Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz108
Translational Animal Science, v. 3, n. 4, p. 133-1142, 2019.
2573-2102
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198832
10.1093/tas/txz108
2-s2.0-85084673059
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz108
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198832
identifier_str_mv Translational Animal Science, v. 3, n. 4, p. 133-1142, 2019.
2573-2102
10.1093/tas/txz108
2-s2.0-85084673059
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Translational Animal Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 133-1142
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964805174394880