To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lovadini, Gustavo B. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Fukushima, Fernanda B. [UNESP], Schoueri, Joao F.L. [UNESP], Reis, Roberto dos [UNESP], Fonseca, Cecilia G.F. [UNESP], Rodriguez, Jahaira J.C. [UNESP], Coelho, Cauana S. [UNESP], Neves, Adriele F. [UNESP], Rodrigues, Aniela M. [UNESP], Marques, Marina A. [UNESP], Bassett, Rick, Steinberg, Karl E., Moss, Alvin H., Vidal, Edison I.O. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.016
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205544
Resumo: Objective: To assess whether medical orders within Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms reflect patients' preferences for care at the end of life. Design: This cross-sectional study assessed the agreement between medical orders in POLST forms and the free-form text documentation of an advance care planning conversation performed by an independent researcher during a single episode of hospitalization. Setting and Participants: Inpatients at a single public university hospital, aged 21 years or older, and for whom one of their attending physicians provided a negative answer to the following question: “Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next year?” Data collection occurred between October 2016 and September 2017. Measures: Agreement between medical orders in POLST forms and the free-form text documentation of an advance care planning conversation was measured by kappa statistics. Results: Sixty-two patients were interviewed. Patients' median (interquartile range) age was 62 (56-70) years, and 21 patients (34%) were women. Overall, in 7 (11%) cases, disagreement in at least 1 medical order for life-sustaining treatment was found between POLST forms and the content of the independent advance care planning conversation. The kappa statistic for cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.00]; for level of medical intervention, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.99); and for artificially administered nutrition, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75-0.98). Conclusions and Implications: The high level of agreement between medical orders in POLST forms and the documentation in an independent advance care planning conversation offers further support for the POLST paradigm. In addition, the finding that the agreement was not 100% underscores the need to confirm frequently that POLST medical orders accurately reflect patients' current values and preferences of care.
id UNSP_ebedc1865d68f49a0c456b9ff72c9640
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205544
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?advance care planningadvance directivespalliative carePOLSTvalidation studiesObjective: To assess whether medical orders within Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms reflect patients' preferences for care at the end of life. Design: This cross-sectional study assessed the agreement between medical orders in POLST forms and the free-form text documentation of an advance care planning conversation performed by an independent researcher during a single episode of hospitalization. Setting and Participants: Inpatients at a single public university hospital, aged 21 years or older, and for whom one of their attending physicians provided a negative answer to the following question: “Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next year?” Data collection occurred between October 2016 and September 2017. Measures: Agreement between medical orders in POLST forms and the free-form text documentation of an advance care planning conversation was measured by kappa statistics. Results: Sixty-two patients were interviewed. Patients' median (interquartile range) age was 62 (56-70) years, and 21 patients (34%) were women. Overall, in 7 (11%) cases, disagreement in at least 1 medical order for life-sustaining treatment was found between POLST forms and the content of the independent advance care planning conversation. The kappa statistic for cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.00]; for level of medical intervention, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.99); and for artificially administered nutrition, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75-0.98). Conclusions and Implications: The high level of agreement between medical orders in POLST forms and the documentation in an independent advance care planning conversation offers further support for the POLST paradigm. In addition, the finding that the agreement was not 100% underscores the need to confirm frequently that POLST medical orders accurately reflect patients' current values and preferences of care.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Botucatu Medical School Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Center for Nursing Excellence St Luke's Health SystemCalifornia State University Institute for Palliative CareCenter for Health Ethics and Law West Virginia UniversityBotucatu Medical School Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)FAPESP: 2014/23966-0FAPESP: 2014/23997-3FAPESP: 2016/25410-5Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)St Luke's Health SystemInstitute for Palliative CareWest Virginia UniversityLovadini, Gustavo B. [UNESP]Fukushima, Fernanda B. [UNESP]Schoueri, Joao F.L. [UNESP]Reis, Roberto dos [UNESP]Fonseca, Cecilia G.F. [UNESP]Rodriguez, Jahaira J.C. [UNESP]Coelho, Cauana S. [UNESP]Neves, Adriele F. [UNESP]Rodrigues, Aniela M. [UNESP]Marques, Marina A. [UNESP]Bassett, RickSteinberg, Karl E.Moss, Alvin H.Vidal, Edison I.O. [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:17:08Z2021-06-25T10:17:08Z2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article334-339.e2http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.016Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, v. 22, n. 2, p. 334-339.e2, 2021.1538-93751525-8610http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20554410.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.0162-s2.0-85096825293Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of the American Medical Directors Associationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T14:48:18Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205544Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T14:48:18Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?
title To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?
spellingShingle To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?
Lovadini, Gustavo B. [UNESP]
advance care planning
advance directives
palliative care
POLST
validation studies
title_short To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?
title_full To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?
title_fullStr To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?
title_full_unstemmed To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?
title_sort To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?
author Lovadini, Gustavo B. [UNESP]
author_facet Lovadini, Gustavo B. [UNESP]
Fukushima, Fernanda B. [UNESP]
Schoueri, Joao F.L. [UNESP]
Reis, Roberto dos [UNESP]
Fonseca, Cecilia G.F. [UNESP]
Rodriguez, Jahaira J.C. [UNESP]
Coelho, Cauana S. [UNESP]
Neves, Adriele F. [UNESP]
Rodrigues, Aniela M. [UNESP]
Marques, Marina A. [UNESP]
Bassett, Rick
Steinberg, Karl E.
Moss, Alvin H.
Vidal, Edison I.O. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Fukushima, Fernanda B. [UNESP]
Schoueri, Joao F.L. [UNESP]
Reis, Roberto dos [UNESP]
Fonseca, Cecilia G.F. [UNESP]
Rodriguez, Jahaira J.C. [UNESP]
Coelho, Cauana S. [UNESP]
Neves, Adriele F. [UNESP]
Rodrigues, Aniela M. [UNESP]
Marques, Marina A. [UNESP]
Bassett, Rick
Steinberg, Karl E.
Moss, Alvin H.
Vidal, Edison I.O. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
St Luke's Health System
Institute for Palliative Care
West Virginia University
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lovadini, Gustavo B. [UNESP]
Fukushima, Fernanda B. [UNESP]
Schoueri, Joao F.L. [UNESP]
Reis, Roberto dos [UNESP]
Fonseca, Cecilia G.F. [UNESP]
Rodriguez, Jahaira J.C. [UNESP]
Coelho, Cauana S. [UNESP]
Neves, Adriele F. [UNESP]
Rodrigues, Aniela M. [UNESP]
Marques, Marina A. [UNESP]
Bassett, Rick
Steinberg, Karl E.
Moss, Alvin H.
Vidal, Edison I.O. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv advance care planning
advance directives
palliative care
POLST
validation studies
topic advance care planning
advance directives
palliative care
POLST
validation studies
description Objective: To assess whether medical orders within Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms reflect patients' preferences for care at the end of life. Design: This cross-sectional study assessed the agreement between medical orders in POLST forms and the free-form text documentation of an advance care planning conversation performed by an independent researcher during a single episode of hospitalization. Setting and Participants: Inpatients at a single public university hospital, aged 21 years or older, and for whom one of their attending physicians provided a negative answer to the following question: “Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next year?” Data collection occurred between October 2016 and September 2017. Measures: Agreement between medical orders in POLST forms and the free-form text documentation of an advance care planning conversation was measured by kappa statistics. Results: Sixty-two patients were interviewed. Patients' median (interquartile range) age was 62 (56-70) years, and 21 patients (34%) were women. Overall, in 7 (11%) cases, disagreement in at least 1 medical order for life-sustaining treatment was found between POLST forms and the content of the independent advance care planning conversation. The kappa statistic for cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.00]; for level of medical intervention, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.99); and for artificially administered nutrition, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75-0.98). Conclusions and Implications: The high level of agreement between medical orders in POLST forms and the documentation in an independent advance care planning conversation offers further support for the POLST paradigm. In addition, the finding that the agreement was not 100% underscores the need to confirm frequently that POLST medical orders accurately reflect patients' current values and preferences of care.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:17:08Z
2021-06-25T10:17:08Z
2021-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.016
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, v. 22, n. 2, p. 334-339.e2, 2021.
1538-9375
1525-8610
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205544
10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.016
2-s2.0-85096825293
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.016
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205544
identifier_str_mv Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, v. 22, n. 2, p. 334-339.e2, 2021.
1538-9375
1525-8610
10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.016
2-s2.0-85096825293
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 334-339.e2
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964893426745344