Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maiorano, Amanda M. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Assen, Alula, Bijma, Piter, Chen, Ching-Yi, Vasconcelos Silva, Josineudson Augusto [UNESP], Herring, William O., Tsuruta, Shogo, Misztal, Ignacy, Lourenco, Daniela A. L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz207
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184597
Resumo: Pooling semen of multiple boars is commonly used in swine production systems. Compared with single boar systems, this technique changes family structure creating maternal half-sib families. The aim of this simulation study was to investigate how pooling semen affects the accuracy of estimating direct and maternal effects for individual piglet birth weight, in purebred pigs. Different scenarios of pooling semen were simulated by allowing the same female to mate from 1 to 6 boars, per insemination, whereas litter size was kept constant (N = 12). In each pooled boar scenario, genomic information was used to construct either the genomic relationship matrix (G) or to reconstruct pedigree in addition to G. Genotypes were generated for 60,000 SNPs evenly distributed across 18 autosomes. From the 5 simulated generations, only animals from generations 3 to 5 were genotyped (N = 36,000). Direct and maternal true breeding values (TBV) were computed as the sum of the effects of the 1,080 QTLs. Phenotypes were constructed as the sum of direct TBV, maternal TBV, an overall mean of 1.25 kg, and a residual effect. The simulated heritabilities for direct and maternal effects were 0.056 and 0.19, respectively, and the genetic correlation between both effects was -0.25. All simulations were replicated 5 times. Variance components and direct and maternal heritability were estimated using average information REML. Predictions were computed via pedigree-based BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Genotyped littermates in the last generation were used for validation. Prediction accuracies were calculated as correlations between EBV and TBV for direct (acc(direct)) and maternal (acc(mat)) effects. When boars were known, acc(direct) were 0.21 (1 boar) and 0.26 (6 boars) for BLUP, whereas for ssGBLUP, they were 0.38 (1 boar) and 0.43 (6 boars). When boars were unknown, acc(direct) was lower in BLUP but similar in ssGBLUP. For the scenario with known boars, acc(mat) was 0.58 and 0.63 for 1 and 6 boars, respectively, under ssGBLUP. For unknown boars, acc(mat) was 0.63 for 2 boars and 0.62 for 6 boars in ssGBLUP. In general, acc(direct) and acc(mat) were lower in the single-boar scenario compared with pooled semen scenarios, indicating that a half-sib structure is more adequate to estimate direct and maternal effects. Using pooled semen from multiple boars can help us to improve accuracy of predicting maternal and direct effects when maternal half-sib families are larger than 2.
id UNSP_edbe5e0f69f3c12c1337de6e6eb08391
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184597
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation studygenomic predictionmaternal abilitymultiple sireprediction accuracyPooling semen of multiple boars is commonly used in swine production systems. Compared with single boar systems, this technique changes family structure creating maternal half-sib families. The aim of this simulation study was to investigate how pooling semen affects the accuracy of estimating direct and maternal effects for individual piglet birth weight, in purebred pigs. Different scenarios of pooling semen were simulated by allowing the same female to mate from 1 to 6 boars, per insemination, whereas litter size was kept constant (N = 12). In each pooled boar scenario, genomic information was used to construct either the genomic relationship matrix (G) or to reconstruct pedigree in addition to G. Genotypes were generated for 60,000 SNPs evenly distributed across 18 autosomes. From the 5 simulated generations, only animals from generations 3 to 5 were genotyped (N = 36,000). Direct and maternal true breeding values (TBV) were computed as the sum of the effects of the 1,080 QTLs. Phenotypes were constructed as the sum of direct TBV, maternal TBV, an overall mean of 1.25 kg, and a residual effect. The simulated heritabilities for direct and maternal effects were 0.056 and 0.19, respectively, and the genetic correlation between both effects was -0.25. All simulations were replicated 5 times. Variance components and direct and maternal heritability were estimated using average information REML. Predictions were computed via pedigree-based BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Genotyped littermates in the last generation were used for validation. Prediction accuracies were calculated as correlations between EBV and TBV for direct (acc(direct)) and maternal (acc(mat)) effects. When boars were known, acc(direct) were 0.21 (1 boar) and 0.26 (6 boars) for BLUP, whereas for ssGBLUP, they were 0.38 (1 boar) and 0.43 (6 boars). When boars were unknown, acc(direct) was lower in BLUP but similar in ssGBLUP. For the scenario with known boars, acc(mat) was 0.58 and 0.63 for 1 and 6 boars, respectively, under ssGBLUP. For unknown boars, acc(mat) was 0.63 for 2 boars and 0.62 for 6 boars in ssGBLUP. In general, acc(direct) and acc(mat) were lower in the single-boar scenario compared with pooled semen scenarios, indicating that a half-sib structure is more adequate to estimate direct and maternal effects. Using pooled semen from multiple boars can help us to improve accuracy of predicting maternal and direct effects when maternal half-sib families are larger than 2.Genus PIC (Hendersonville, TN)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USAWageningen Univ & Res, Anim Breeding & Genet Ctr, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, NetherlandsGenus PIC, Hendersonville, TN 37075 USASao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilCAPES: 001CAPES: 88881.131671/2016-01Oxford Univ Press IncUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Univ GeorgiaWageningen Univ & ResGenus PICMaiorano, Amanda M. [UNESP]Assen, AlulaBijma, PiterChen, Ching-YiVasconcelos Silva, Josineudson Augusto [UNESP]Herring, William O.Tsuruta, ShogoMisztal, IgnacyLourenco, Daniela A. L.2019-10-04T12:14:57Z2019-10-04T12:14:57Z2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article3237-3245http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz207Journal Of Animal Science. Cary: Oxford Univ Press Inc, v. 97, n. 8, p. 3237-3245, 2019.0021-8812http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18459710.1093/jas/skz207WOS:000477868300007Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Animal Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T02:05:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184597Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T02:05:54Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study
title Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study
spellingShingle Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study
Maiorano, Amanda M. [UNESP]
genomic prediction
maternal ability
multiple sire
prediction accuracy
title_short Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study
title_full Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study
title_fullStr Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study
title_sort Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study
author Maiorano, Amanda M. [UNESP]
author_facet Maiorano, Amanda M. [UNESP]
Assen, Alula
Bijma, Piter
Chen, Ching-Yi
Vasconcelos Silva, Josineudson Augusto [UNESP]
Herring, William O.
Tsuruta, Shogo
Misztal, Ignacy
Lourenco, Daniela A. L.
author_role author
author2 Assen, Alula
Bijma, Piter
Chen, Ching-Yi
Vasconcelos Silva, Josineudson Augusto [UNESP]
Herring, William O.
Tsuruta, Shogo
Misztal, Ignacy
Lourenco, Daniela A. L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Univ Georgia
Wageningen Univ & Res
Genus PIC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maiorano, Amanda M. [UNESP]
Assen, Alula
Bijma, Piter
Chen, Ching-Yi
Vasconcelos Silva, Josineudson Augusto [UNESP]
Herring, William O.
Tsuruta, Shogo
Misztal, Ignacy
Lourenco, Daniela A. L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv genomic prediction
maternal ability
multiple sire
prediction accuracy
topic genomic prediction
maternal ability
multiple sire
prediction accuracy
description Pooling semen of multiple boars is commonly used in swine production systems. Compared with single boar systems, this technique changes family structure creating maternal half-sib families. The aim of this simulation study was to investigate how pooling semen affects the accuracy of estimating direct and maternal effects for individual piglet birth weight, in purebred pigs. Different scenarios of pooling semen were simulated by allowing the same female to mate from 1 to 6 boars, per insemination, whereas litter size was kept constant (N = 12). In each pooled boar scenario, genomic information was used to construct either the genomic relationship matrix (G) or to reconstruct pedigree in addition to G. Genotypes were generated for 60,000 SNPs evenly distributed across 18 autosomes. From the 5 simulated generations, only animals from generations 3 to 5 were genotyped (N = 36,000). Direct and maternal true breeding values (TBV) were computed as the sum of the effects of the 1,080 QTLs. Phenotypes were constructed as the sum of direct TBV, maternal TBV, an overall mean of 1.25 kg, and a residual effect. The simulated heritabilities for direct and maternal effects were 0.056 and 0.19, respectively, and the genetic correlation between both effects was -0.25. All simulations were replicated 5 times. Variance components and direct and maternal heritability were estimated using average information REML. Predictions were computed via pedigree-based BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Genotyped littermates in the last generation were used for validation. Prediction accuracies were calculated as correlations between EBV and TBV for direct (acc(direct)) and maternal (acc(mat)) effects. When boars were known, acc(direct) were 0.21 (1 boar) and 0.26 (6 boars) for BLUP, whereas for ssGBLUP, they were 0.38 (1 boar) and 0.43 (6 boars). When boars were unknown, acc(direct) was lower in BLUP but similar in ssGBLUP. For the scenario with known boars, acc(mat) was 0.58 and 0.63 for 1 and 6 boars, respectively, under ssGBLUP. For unknown boars, acc(mat) was 0.63 for 2 boars and 0.62 for 6 boars in ssGBLUP. In general, acc(direct) and acc(mat) were lower in the single-boar scenario compared with pooled semen scenarios, indicating that a half-sib structure is more adequate to estimate direct and maternal effects. Using pooled semen from multiple boars can help us to improve accuracy of predicting maternal and direct effects when maternal half-sib families are larger than 2.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-04T12:14:57Z
2019-10-04T12:14:57Z
2019-08-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz207
Journal Of Animal Science. Cary: Oxford Univ Press Inc, v. 97, n. 8, p. 3237-3245, 2019.
0021-8812
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184597
10.1093/jas/skz207
WOS:000477868300007
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz207
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184597
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Animal Science. Cary: Oxford Univ Press Inc, v. 97, n. 8, p. 3237-3245, 2019.
0021-8812
10.1093/jas/skz207
WOS:000477868300007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Animal Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 3237-3245
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1792962288910598144