Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Octavio Oliveira, Steffan Edward [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Gregory, Neville George, Dalla Costa, Filipe Antonio [UNESP], Gibson, Troy John, Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa, Mateus Jose [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.007
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162838
Resumo: The efficiency of stunning cattle was assessed in 443 animals (304 pure Zebu and 139 crossbred cattle), being mainly mature bulls and cows. Cattle were stunned using a Jarvis pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun operating with low (160-175 psi, N = 82) and high (190 psi, N = 363) airline pressure, which was within the manufactures specifications. Signs of brain function and the position of the shots on the heads were recorded after stunning. Velocity of the captive bolt and its physical parameters were calculated. Cattle shot with low pressures showed more rhythmic respiration (27 vs. 8%, P < 0.001), less tongue protrusion (4 vs. 12%, P = 0.03) and less masseter relaxation (22 vs. 48%, P < 0.001). There was an increased frequency of shots in the ideal position when cattle were shot with the low compared to high airline pressures (15.3 vs. 3.1%). Bolt velocity and its physical parameters were significantly (P < 0.01) higher when using high pressure. Airline pressures below 190 psi are inappropriate when shooting adult Zebu beef cattle with pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt guns.
id UNSP_feaacf1ac6289ce1db91634d0aabbaa3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/162838
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gunAirline pressureBolt velocityConsciousnessRhythmic respirationShotThe efficiency of stunning cattle was assessed in 443 animals (304 pure Zebu and 139 crossbred cattle), being mainly mature bulls and cows. Cattle were stunned using a Jarvis pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun operating with low (160-175 psi, N = 82) and high (190 psi, N = 363) airline pressure, which was within the manufactures specifications. Signs of brain function and the position of the shots on the heads were recorded after stunning. Velocity of the captive bolt and its physical parameters were calculated. Cattle shot with low pressures showed more rhythmic respiration (27 vs. 8%, P < 0.001), less tongue protrusion (4 vs. 12%, P = 0.03) and less masseter relaxation (22 vs. 48%, P < 0.001). There was an increased frequency of shots in the ideal position when cattle were shot with the low compared to high airline pressures (15.3 vs. 3.1%). Bolt velocity and its physical parameters were significantly (P < 0.01) higher when using high pressure. Airline pressures below 190 psi are inappropriate when shooting adult Zebu beef cattle with pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt guns.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencia Agr & Vet, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencia Agr & Vet, Dept Zootecnia, Grp Estudos & Pesquisas Etol & Ecol Anim, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv London, Royal Vet Coll, London, EnglandUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencia Agr & Vet, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencia Agr & Vet, Dept Zootecnia, Grp Estudos & Pesquisas Etol & Ecol Anim, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilElsevier B.V.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Univ LondonOctavio Oliveira, Steffan Edward [UNESP]Gregory, Neville GeorgeDalla Costa, Filipe Antonio [UNESP]Gibson, Troy JohnRodrigues Paranhos da Costa, Mateus Jose [UNESP]2018-11-26T17:33:02Z2018-11-26T17:33:02Z2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article64-68application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.007Meat Science. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 130, p. 64-68, 2017.0309-1740http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16283810.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.007WOS:000402212800010WOS000402212800010.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengMeat Science1,643info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-05T06:03:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/162838Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-10-05T06:03:49Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun
title Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun
spellingShingle Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun
Octavio Oliveira, Steffan Edward [UNESP]
Airline pressure
Bolt velocity
Consciousness
Rhythmic respiration
Shot
title_short Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun
title_full Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun
title_fullStr Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun
title_sort Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun
author Octavio Oliveira, Steffan Edward [UNESP]
author_facet Octavio Oliveira, Steffan Edward [UNESP]
Gregory, Neville George
Dalla Costa, Filipe Antonio [UNESP]
Gibson, Troy John
Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa, Mateus Jose [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Gregory, Neville George
Dalla Costa, Filipe Antonio [UNESP]
Gibson, Troy John
Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa, Mateus Jose [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Univ London
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Octavio Oliveira, Steffan Edward [UNESP]
Gregory, Neville George
Dalla Costa, Filipe Antonio [UNESP]
Gibson, Troy John
Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa, Mateus Jose [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Airline pressure
Bolt velocity
Consciousness
Rhythmic respiration
Shot
topic Airline pressure
Bolt velocity
Consciousness
Rhythmic respiration
Shot
description The efficiency of stunning cattle was assessed in 443 animals (304 pure Zebu and 139 crossbred cattle), being mainly mature bulls and cows. Cattle were stunned using a Jarvis pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun operating with low (160-175 psi, N = 82) and high (190 psi, N = 363) airline pressure, which was within the manufactures specifications. Signs of brain function and the position of the shots on the heads were recorded after stunning. Velocity of the captive bolt and its physical parameters were calculated. Cattle shot with low pressures showed more rhythmic respiration (27 vs. 8%, P < 0.001), less tongue protrusion (4 vs. 12%, P = 0.03) and less masseter relaxation (22 vs. 48%, P < 0.001). There was an increased frequency of shots in the ideal position when cattle were shot with the low compared to high airline pressures (15.3 vs. 3.1%). Bolt velocity and its physical parameters were significantly (P < 0.01) higher when using high pressure. Airline pressures below 190 psi are inappropriate when shooting adult Zebu beef cattle with pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt guns.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
2018-11-26T17:33:02Z
2018-11-26T17:33:02Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.007
Meat Science. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 130, p. 64-68, 2017.
0309-1740
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162838
10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.007
WOS:000402212800010
WOS000402212800010.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.007
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162838
identifier_str_mv Meat Science. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 130, p. 64-68, 2017.
0309-1740
10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.007
WOS:000402212800010
WOS000402212800010.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Meat Science
1,643
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 64-68
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964440500633600