Differential Haematobia irritans infestation levels in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional pasture systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Marcia Cristina de S.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Nicodemo, Maria Luiza F., Gusmao, Marcos R., Pezzopane, Jose Ricardo M., Bilhassi, Talita B. [UNESP], Santana, Clarissa H. [UNESP], Goncalves, Thuane C. [UNESP], Rabelo, Marcio D., Giglioti, Rodrigo [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.020
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163440
Resumo: The use of silvopastoral systems (SPS) can be a good alternative to reduce the environmental impacts of livestock breeding in Brazil. One of the reasons for its scarce adoption is the lack of information on health and productivity of cattle raised under these conditions. The experiment reported here was designed to compare the infestation by external parasites - the cattle tick (Rhipicephalus microplus), horn fly (Haematobia irritans), and larvae of the botfly (Dermatobia hominis) - in beef cattle raised in a SPS and a conventional pasture system (CPS), evaluated for 24 months. Data on air and soil temperature, solar radiation, wind incidence and water balance were used to characterize the SPS and CPS. R. microplus adult females and D. hominis larvae were counted on the body of each animal to determine the parasites burdens, but we did not find significant differences between the two systems. Horn flies counts on animals' body, and analysis of the horn fly and its pupal parasitoids associated with the dung pats were obtained in the two systems. Horn fly infestation was significantly lower (p = 0.01) in the SPS (13.17 +/- 3.46) in comparison with the CPS (24.02 +/- 4.43). In SPS and CPS, respectively, the mean densities of pupae of H. irritansin dung pats were 9.8 and 10.7; the mean density of adults of H. irritans, 3.7 and 3.5; and the density of its pupal parasitoids were 20.5 and 5.4. The effect of production system was significant (p < 0.05) only for the occurrence of pupal parasitoids of the horn fly, where the greatest occurrences of these natural enemies were in the SPS. These data indicate that natural enemies were able to control, at least partially, the horn fly populations in the cattle.
id UNSP_ff7cc7dcaa64a927d50b899b85d59ea2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163440
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Differential Haematobia irritans infestation levels in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional pasture systemsHorn flyBeef cattleBiodiversityEnvironmental complexityThe use of silvopastoral systems (SPS) can be a good alternative to reduce the environmental impacts of livestock breeding in Brazil. One of the reasons for its scarce adoption is the lack of information on health and productivity of cattle raised under these conditions. The experiment reported here was designed to compare the infestation by external parasites - the cattle tick (Rhipicephalus microplus), horn fly (Haematobia irritans), and larvae of the botfly (Dermatobia hominis) - in beef cattle raised in a SPS and a conventional pasture system (CPS), evaluated for 24 months. Data on air and soil temperature, solar radiation, wind incidence and water balance were used to characterize the SPS and CPS. R. microplus adult females and D. hominis larvae were counted on the body of each animal to determine the parasites burdens, but we did not find significant differences between the two systems. Horn flies counts on animals' body, and analysis of the horn fly and its pupal parasitoids associated with the dung pats were obtained in the two systems. Horn fly infestation was significantly lower (p = 0.01) in the SPS (13.17 +/- 3.46) in comparison with the CPS (24.02 +/- 4.43). In SPS and CPS, respectively, the mean densities of pupae of H. irritansin dung pats were 9.8 and 10.7; the mean density of adults of H. irritans, 3.7 and 3.5; and the density of its pupal parasitoids were 20.5 and 5.4. The effect of production system was significant (p < 0.05) only for the occurrence of pupal parasitoids of the horn fly, where the greatest occurrences of these natural enemies were in the SPS. These data indicate that natural enemies were able to control, at least partially, the horn fly populations in the cattle.Embrapa Pecuaria Sudeste, Rodovia Washington Luiz,Km 234,CP 339, BR-13560970 Sao Carlos, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Zootecnia, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Zootecnia, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilElsevier B.V.Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Oliveira, Marcia Cristina de S.Nicodemo, Maria Luiza F.Gusmao, Marcos R.Pezzopane, Jose Ricardo M.Bilhassi, Talita B. [UNESP]Santana, Clarissa H. [UNESP]Goncalves, Thuane C. [UNESP]Rabelo, Marcio D.Giglioti, Rodrigo [UNESP]2018-11-26T17:42:02Z2018-11-26T17:42:02Z2017-11-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article96-99application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.020Veterinary Parasitology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 246, p. 96-99, 2017.0304-4017http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16344010.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.020WOS:000414107000016WOS000414107000016.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengVeterinary Parasitology1,275info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-15T06:19:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163440Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-15T06:19:26Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differential Haematobia irritans infestation levels in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional pasture systems
title Differential Haematobia irritans infestation levels in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional pasture systems
spellingShingle Differential Haematobia irritans infestation levels in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional pasture systems
Oliveira, Marcia Cristina de S.
Horn fly
Beef cattle
Biodiversity
Environmental complexity
title_short Differential Haematobia irritans infestation levels in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional pasture systems
title_full Differential Haematobia irritans infestation levels in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional pasture systems
title_fullStr Differential Haematobia irritans infestation levels in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional pasture systems
title_full_unstemmed Differential Haematobia irritans infestation levels in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional pasture systems
title_sort Differential Haematobia irritans infestation levels in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional pasture systems
author Oliveira, Marcia Cristina de S.
author_facet Oliveira, Marcia Cristina de S.
Nicodemo, Maria Luiza F.
Gusmao, Marcos R.
Pezzopane, Jose Ricardo M.
Bilhassi, Talita B. [UNESP]
Santana, Clarissa H. [UNESP]
Goncalves, Thuane C. [UNESP]
Rabelo, Marcio D.
Giglioti, Rodrigo [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Nicodemo, Maria Luiza F.
Gusmao, Marcos R.
Pezzopane, Jose Ricardo M.
Bilhassi, Talita B. [UNESP]
Santana, Clarissa H. [UNESP]
Goncalves, Thuane C. [UNESP]
Rabelo, Marcio D.
Giglioti, Rodrigo [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Marcia Cristina de S.
Nicodemo, Maria Luiza F.
Gusmao, Marcos R.
Pezzopane, Jose Ricardo M.
Bilhassi, Talita B. [UNESP]
Santana, Clarissa H. [UNESP]
Goncalves, Thuane C. [UNESP]
Rabelo, Marcio D.
Giglioti, Rodrigo [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Horn fly
Beef cattle
Biodiversity
Environmental complexity
topic Horn fly
Beef cattle
Biodiversity
Environmental complexity
description The use of silvopastoral systems (SPS) can be a good alternative to reduce the environmental impacts of livestock breeding in Brazil. One of the reasons for its scarce adoption is the lack of information on health and productivity of cattle raised under these conditions. The experiment reported here was designed to compare the infestation by external parasites - the cattle tick (Rhipicephalus microplus), horn fly (Haematobia irritans), and larvae of the botfly (Dermatobia hominis) - in beef cattle raised in a SPS and a conventional pasture system (CPS), evaluated for 24 months. Data on air and soil temperature, solar radiation, wind incidence and water balance were used to characterize the SPS and CPS. R. microplus adult females and D. hominis larvae were counted on the body of each animal to determine the parasites burdens, but we did not find significant differences between the two systems. Horn flies counts on animals' body, and analysis of the horn fly and its pupal parasitoids associated with the dung pats were obtained in the two systems. Horn fly infestation was significantly lower (p = 0.01) in the SPS (13.17 +/- 3.46) in comparison with the CPS (24.02 +/- 4.43). In SPS and CPS, respectively, the mean densities of pupae of H. irritansin dung pats were 9.8 and 10.7; the mean density of adults of H. irritans, 3.7 and 3.5; and the density of its pupal parasitoids were 20.5 and 5.4. The effect of production system was significant (p < 0.05) only for the occurrence of pupal parasitoids of the horn fly, where the greatest occurrences of these natural enemies were in the SPS. These data indicate that natural enemies were able to control, at least partially, the horn fly populations in the cattle.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-11-15
2018-11-26T17:42:02Z
2018-11-26T17:42:02Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.020
Veterinary Parasitology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 246, p. 96-99, 2017.
0304-4017
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163440
10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.020
WOS:000414107000016
WOS000414107000016.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.020
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163440
identifier_str_mv Veterinary Parasitology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 246, p. 96-99, 2017.
0304-4017
10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.020
WOS:000414107000016
WOS000414107000016.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Veterinary Parasitology
1,275
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 96-99
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797790011239694336