The Affectivity in the Organized of the Human Reasoning: A Brief Reflection
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2005 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
Download full: | http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/1025 |
Summary: | This article debates empirically about the affectivity’s paper in the organization of the human reasoning. The Thought Organization Models theory was utilized as the psychological foundation. It introduces part of some data of empiric research proveniences of a study of the Basic Psychology. In this research, they selected as sample 60 subjects of two schools in Campinas (São Paulo), asking them who answered to a conflictive situation in which a character asks R$10,00 to pay a mother's exam. The premise of the moral dilemma is then structured into two scenarios: the first is non-contextualized and the second is contextualized. In the non-contextualized scenario, there is no description whatsoever of the character involved in the dilemma. The contextualized scenario on the other hand, includes demonstrative affectionate descriptors both positive and negative in nature referent to the character. The third grade students responded to positive contextualized scenario and the second grade students to a negative contextualized scenario. After reading of the protocols, for discussion of the answers, were produced three analysis categories: the first corresponds help from subject to the character, the second that indicates the refusal in assist her third in which the subject does not know what to do and/or it has doubts. The data obtained substantiated that affection, found in the contextualized scenarios both negative and positive, favored the thought process of subjects, considerably modifying the manner in which it was organized in regards to the moral dilemma and to indicate a certain tendency in “if involve” with character's problem and searching thus avail her. |
id |
UPM-1_728af8c3baf99abed9a4a35c318c52f4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/1025 |
network_acronym_str |
UPM-1 |
network_name_str |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Affectivity in the Organized of the Human Reasoning: A Brief ReflectionA Afetividade na Organização do Raciocínio Humano: Uma Breve DiscussãoPsychologyAffectivityEmotionFeelingHuman ReasoningPsicologiaAfetividadeEmoçãoSentimentoRaciocínio HumanoThis article debates empirically about the affectivity’s paper in the organization of the human reasoning. The Thought Organization Models theory was utilized as the psychological foundation. It introduces part of some data of empiric research proveniences of a study of the Basic Psychology. In this research, they selected as sample 60 subjects of two schools in Campinas (São Paulo), asking them who answered to a conflictive situation in which a character asks R$10,00 to pay a mother's exam. The premise of the moral dilemma is then structured into two scenarios: the first is non-contextualized and the second is contextualized. In the non-contextualized scenario, there is no description whatsoever of the character involved in the dilemma. The contextualized scenario on the other hand, includes demonstrative affectionate descriptors both positive and negative in nature referent to the character. The third grade students responded to positive contextualized scenario and the second grade students to a negative contextualized scenario. After reading of the protocols, for discussion of the answers, were produced three analysis categories: the first corresponds help from subject to the character, the second that indicates the refusal in assist her third in which the subject does not know what to do and/or it has doubts. The data obtained substantiated that affection, found in the contextualized scenarios both negative and positive, favored the thought process of subjects, considerably modifying the manner in which it was organized in regards to the moral dilemma and to indicate a certain tendency in “if involve” with character's problem and searching thus avail her.Este ensaio procura debater empiricamente o papel da afetividade na organização do raciocínio humano. Como suporte psicológico escolheu-se a Teoria dos Modelos Organizadores do Pensamento. Apresenta-se parte de alguns dados de uma pesquisa empírica na área da Psicologia Básica. Nessa pesquisa, selecionaram-se como amostra 60 sujeitos de duas escolas de Campinas (São Paulo), solicitando-se aos alunos que respondessem a uma situação conflitiva em que uma personagem pede R$10,00 para pagar um exame de sua mãe. Dividiu-se a temática da situação-conflitiva em duas partes: uma descontextualizada e outra contextualizada. Na primeira, não houve qualquer descrição da personagem do conflito. Na segunda, colocaram-se elementos afetivos positivos e negativos da personagem no texto, sendo que os alunos do 3º ano do Ensino Médio responderam a uma situação contextualizada positiva, ao passo que os alunos do 2º ano responderam a uma situação contextualizada negativa. Após leitura dos protocolos, foram elencadas três categorias de análise: a primeira corresponde à ajuda do sujeito à personagem, a segunda indica a recusa em auxiliá-la e a terceira indica que o sujeito não sabe o que fazer e/ou tem dúvida. Os dados obtidos evidenciaram que a afetividade, encontrada nas situações contextualizadas positiva e negativa, favoreceu o curso do raciocínio dos sujeitos, modificando consideravelmente a forma de organizá-lo acerca da situação-conflitiva e indicar uma certa tendência em “se envolver” com o problema da personagem, procurando assim ajudá-la.Editora Mackenzie2005-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/1025Journal Psychology: Theory and Practice ; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2005); 35-50Revista Psicologia: Teoría y Práctica; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2005); 35-50Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática; v. 7 n. 1 (2005); 35-501980-69061516-3687reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)instacron:UPMporhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/1025/742Pinto, Fausto Eduardo Menoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-01-07T18:01:49Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/1025Revistahttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/indexPRIhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/oairevistapsico@mackenzie.br1980-69061516-3687opendoar:2023-01-12T16:39:30.063713Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Affectivity in the Organized of the Human Reasoning: A Brief Reflection A Afetividade na Organização do Raciocínio Humano: Uma Breve Discussão |
title |
The Affectivity in the Organized of the Human Reasoning: A Brief Reflection |
spellingShingle |
The Affectivity in the Organized of the Human Reasoning: A Brief Reflection Pinto, Fausto Eduardo Menon Psychology Affectivity Emotion Feeling Human Reasoning Psicologia Afetividade Emoção Sentimento Raciocínio Humano |
title_short |
The Affectivity in the Organized of the Human Reasoning: A Brief Reflection |
title_full |
The Affectivity in the Organized of the Human Reasoning: A Brief Reflection |
title_fullStr |
The Affectivity in the Organized of the Human Reasoning: A Brief Reflection |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Affectivity in the Organized of the Human Reasoning: A Brief Reflection |
title_sort |
The Affectivity in the Organized of the Human Reasoning: A Brief Reflection |
author |
Pinto, Fausto Eduardo Menon |
author_facet |
Pinto, Fausto Eduardo Menon |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto, Fausto Eduardo Menon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Psychology Affectivity Emotion Feeling Human Reasoning Psicologia Afetividade Emoção Sentimento Raciocínio Humano |
topic |
Psychology Affectivity Emotion Feeling Human Reasoning Psicologia Afetividade Emoção Sentimento Raciocínio Humano |
description |
This article debates empirically about the affectivity’s paper in the organization of the human reasoning. The Thought Organization Models theory was utilized as the psychological foundation. It introduces part of some data of empiric research proveniences of a study of the Basic Psychology. In this research, they selected as sample 60 subjects of two schools in Campinas (São Paulo), asking them who answered to a conflictive situation in which a character asks R$10,00 to pay a mother's exam. The premise of the moral dilemma is then structured into two scenarios: the first is non-contextualized and the second is contextualized. In the non-contextualized scenario, there is no description whatsoever of the character involved in the dilemma. The contextualized scenario on the other hand, includes demonstrative affectionate descriptors both positive and negative in nature referent to the character. The third grade students responded to positive contextualized scenario and the second grade students to a negative contextualized scenario. After reading of the protocols, for discussion of the answers, were produced three analysis categories: the first corresponds help from subject to the character, the second that indicates the refusal in assist her third in which the subject does not know what to do and/or it has doubts. The data obtained substantiated that affection, found in the contextualized scenarios both negative and positive, favored the thought process of subjects, considerably modifying the manner in which it was organized in regards to the moral dilemma and to indicate a certain tendency in “if involve” with character's problem and searching thus avail her. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/1025 |
url |
http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/1025 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/1025/742 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal Psychology: Theory and Practice ; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2005); 35-50 Revista Psicologia: Teoría y Práctica; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2005); 35-50 Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática; v. 7 n. 1 (2005); 35-50 1980-6906 1516-3687 reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM) instacron:UPM |
instname_str |
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM) |
instacron_str |
UPM |
institution |
UPM |
reponame_str |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
collection |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistapsico@mackenzie.br |
_version_ |
1797051379537149952 |