Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SILVA JÚNIOR, Sebastião da
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
Texto Completo: http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/5350
Resumo: The grapes Vitis labrusca contributes activily for the Brazilian development social and economic, particularly in reference to the semiarid region of the médium San Francisco Irrigated area. To the improvement of the grape productivity is necessary the fertilizers application. Actually is recognized that the chitosan biopolymer has specific properties that display great potential for application to obtain various commercial products, especially due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability and reativity inerent to the aminic group. The chitosan may be applied in agriculture for plant protection against phytophatogenic agents. Assays “in vitro” were carried out with the aim to characterize and evaluate the effects of shrimp chitosan produced with different molecular weight (low, medium and high) against the pathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea that promote the “Gray mold disease” on grape fruits. At the same time it was produced the bioprotector (P) from P and K rock biofertilizers mixed with organic matter inoculated with free living diazotrophic bacteria and with the fungi Cunninghamella elegans that produce the biopolymer chitosan that act increasing nutrient content and protect the plants against phitopatogens, and may be alternative furnishing nutrients and substitute the conventional fertilizers. In field experiments conductes at the Fine wine viniculture (Bottiecelli Company), were evaluated the effects of the bioprotector (P) in chemical soil attributes and in the grape yield, comparing the bioprotector effect (P) with the mineral soluble fertilizer (F). It was also evaluated the grape nutrition that constitute one of the most important factor that have influence on the yield parameter, especially for macronutrients. In a general way, the results showed that the bioprotector (P) may be alternative in substitution for conventional soluble fertilizers, because displayed great liberation of nutrients to the soil system and for the plants, and also present potential for antimicrobial use, in special against the Botrytis cinerea fungi that produce gray mold disease in grape fruits.
id URPE_14720bd8d2bc3d5ca22a250a88af2fdc
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2:tede2/5350
network_acronym_str URPE
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
repository_id_str
spelling STAMFORD, Newton PereiraSANTOS, Carolina Etienne de Rosália e SilvaFRANCO, Luciana de OliveiraPINTADO, Maria Manuela EstevesOLIVEIRA, José de PaulaFranco, Luciana de OliveiraBARROS, Maria de Fátima Cavalcantihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1565684344123367SILVA JÚNIOR, Sebastião da2016-08-16T13:50:04Z2012-07-31SILVA JÚNIOR, Sebastião da. Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel. 2012. 107 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência do Solo) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/5350The grapes Vitis labrusca contributes activily for the Brazilian development social and economic, particularly in reference to the semiarid region of the médium San Francisco Irrigated area. To the improvement of the grape productivity is necessary the fertilizers application. Actually is recognized that the chitosan biopolymer has specific properties that display great potential for application to obtain various commercial products, especially due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability and reativity inerent to the aminic group. The chitosan may be applied in agriculture for plant protection against phytophatogenic agents. Assays “in vitro” were carried out with the aim to characterize and evaluate the effects of shrimp chitosan produced with different molecular weight (low, medium and high) against the pathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea that promote the “Gray mold disease” on grape fruits. At the same time it was produced the bioprotector (P) from P and K rock biofertilizers mixed with organic matter inoculated with free living diazotrophic bacteria and with the fungi Cunninghamella elegans that produce the biopolymer chitosan that act increasing nutrient content and protect the plants against phitopatogens, and may be alternative furnishing nutrients and substitute the conventional fertilizers. In field experiments conductes at the Fine wine viniculture (Bottiecelli Company), were evaluated the effects of the bioprotector (P) in chemical soil attributes and in the grape yield, comparing the bioprotector effect (P) with the mineral soluble fertilizer (F). It was also evaluated the grape nutrition that constitute one of the most important factor that have influence on the yield parameter, especially for macronutrients. In a general way, the results showed that the bioprotector (P) may be alternative in substitution for conventional soluble fertilizers, because displayed great liberation of nutrients to the soil system and for the plants, and also present potential for antimicrobial use, in special against the Botrytis cinerea fungi that produce gray mold disease in grape fruits.A uva Vitis labrusca contribui ativamente para o desenvolvimento sócioeconomico do País, em particular da região semiárido do médio São Francisco. Para incremento da produtividade da uva é necessário a aplicação de fertilizantes. É reconhecido, atualmente, que a quitosana possui propriedades específicas que mostram grande potencial para inúmeras aplicações em vários produtos comerciais, especialmente devido a sua biocompatibilidade, biodegradabilidade e reatividade do grupo amínico. A quitosana possa ser aplicada na agricultura com ação de proteção de planta contra agentes fitopatogênico. Ensaios in vitro foram realizados com o objetivo de caracterizar e avaliar os efeitos de quitosana de camarão com diferentes pesos moleculares (baixo, médio e alto) contra o fungo patogênico Botrytis cinerea causador da “podridão cinzenta” em frutos de uva. Paralelamente foi produzido o bioprotetor (P) a partir de biofertilizante de rochas em mistura com mais matéria orgânica inoculada com bactéria diazotrófica de vida livre e com Cunninghamella elegans que possui quitosana, biopolímero que atua fornecendo nutrientes e protege a planta contra fitopatógenos, podendo ser uma alternativa para substituição aos insumos convencionais. Em experimento de campo realizado na Vinícola Botticelli, procurou-se avaliar o efeito do bioprotetor (P) em atributos químicos do solo e na produtividade da uva, visando comparar o efeito de bioprotetor (P) e fertilizante mineral solúvel (F). Também foi avaliada a nutrição da videira que constitui um fator dos mais importantes para o desempenho produtivo, especialmente considerando os macronutrientes. De uma maneira geral, os resultados mostraram que o bioprodutor pode ser alternativo em substituição a fertilizantes convencionais solúveis, tendo em vista que mostrou maior liberação de nutrientes para o solo e para a planta, e também apresenta potencial para uso antimicrobiano, especialmente contra o fungo Botrytis cinerea causador da podridão cinzenta nos frutos da uva.Submitted by (lucia.rodrigues@ufrpe.br) on 2016-08-16T13:50:04Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Sebastiao da Silva Junior.pdf: 708266 bytes, checksum: 7c87068f4378906bfe5945f8009b5d88 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-16T13:50:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Sebastiao da Silva Junior.pdf: 708266 bytes, checksum: 7c87068f4378906bfe5945f8009b5d88 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-07-31Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência do SoloUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de AgronomiaUvaVitis labruscaBioprotetorBactéria diazotróficaQuitosana fúngicaAGRONOMIA::CIENCIA DO SOLOBioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva IsabelBioprotector with diazotrophic bacteria and fungal chitosan compared to mineral fertilizer soluble grape Isabelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis8551734419043507650600600600600-6800553879972229205-59198405272323756712075167498588264571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPELICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/5350/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALSebastiao da Silva Junior.pdfSebastiao da Silva Junior.pdfapplication/pdf708266http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/5350/2/Sebastiao+da+Silva+Junior.pdf7c87068f4378906bfe5945f8009b5d88MD52tede2/53502018-07-20 11:02:13.585oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2018-07-20T14:02:13Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Bioprotector with diazotrophic bacteria and fungal chitosan compared to mineral fertilizer soluble grape Isabel
title Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel
spellingShingle Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel
SILVA JÚNIOR, Sebastião da
Uva
Vitis labrusca
Bioprotetor
Bactéria diazotrófica
Quitosana fúngica
AGRONOMIA::CIENCIA DO SOLO
title_short Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel
title_full Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel
title_fullStr Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel
title_full_unstemmed Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel
title_sort Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel
author SILVA JÚNIOR, Sebastião da
author_facet SILVA JÚNIOR, Sebastião da
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv STAMFORD, Newton Pereira
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv SANTOS, Carolina Etienne de Rosália e Silva
dc.contributor.advisor-co2.fl_str_mv FRANCO, Luciana de Oliveira
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv PINTADO, Maria Manuela Esteves
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv OLIVEIRA, José de Paula
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Franco, Luciana de Oliveira
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv BARROS, Maria de Fátima Cavalcanti
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1565684344123367
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SILVA JÚNIOR, Sebastião da
contributor_str_mv STAMFORD, Newton Pereira
SANTOS, Carolina Etienne de Rosália e Silva
FRANCO, Luciana de Oliveira
PINTADO, Maria Manuela Esteves
OLIVEIRA, José de Paula
Franco, Luciana de Oliveira
BARROS, Maria de Fátima Cavalcanti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Uva
Vitis labrusca
Bioprotetor
Bactéria diazotrófica
Quitosana fúngica
topic Uva
Vitis labrusca
Bioprotetor
Bactéria diazotrófica
Quitosana fúngica
AGRONOMIA::CIENCIA DO SOLO
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv AGRONOMIA::CIENCIA DO SOLO
description The grapes Vitis labrusca contributes activily for the Brazilian development social and economic, particularly in reference to the semiarid region of the médium San Francisco Irrigated area. To the improvement of the grape productivity is necessary the fertilizers application. Actually is recognized that the chitosan biopolymer has specific properties that display great potential for application to obtain various commercial products, especially due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability and reativity inerent to the aminic group. The chitosan may be applied in agriculture for plant protection against phytophatogenic agents. Assays “in vitro” were carried out with the aim to characterize and evaluate the effects of shrimp chitosan produced with different molecular weight (low, medium and high) against the pathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea that promote the “Gray mold disease” on grape fruits. At the same time it was produced the bioprotector (P) from P and K rock biofertilizers mixed with organic matter inoculated with free living diazotrophic bacteria and with the fungi Cunninghamella elegans that produce the biopolymer chitosan that act increasing nutrient content and protect the plants against phitopatogens, and may be alternative furnishing nutrients and substitute the conventional fertilizers. In field experiments conductes at the Fine wine viniculture (Bottiecelli Company), were evaluated the effects of the bioprotector (P) in chemical soil attributes and in the grape yield, comparing the bioprotector effect (P) with the mineral soluble fertilizer (F). It was also evaluated the grape nutrition that constitute one of the most important factor that have influence on the yield parameter, especially for macronutrients. In a general way, the results showed that the bioprotector (P) may be alternative in substitution for conventional soluble fertilizers, because displayed great liberation of nutrients to the soil system and for the plants, and also present potential for antimicrobial use, in special against the Botrytis cinerea fungi that produce gray mold disease in grape fruits.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-07-31
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-08-16T13:50:04Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv SILVA JÚNIOR, Sebastião da. Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel. 2012. 107 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência do Solo) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/5350
identifier_str_mv SILVA JÚNIOR, Sebastião da. Bioprotetor com bactéria diazotrófica e quitosana fúngica em comparação com fertilizante mineral solúvel na uva Isabel. 2012. 107 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência do Solo) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
url http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/5350
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 8551734419043507650
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -6800553879972229205
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -5919840527232375671
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv 2075167498588264571
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência do Solo
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRPE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Departamento de Agronomia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron:UFRPE
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron_str UFRPE
institution UFRPE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/5350/1/license.txt
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/5350/2/Sebastiao+da+Silva+Junior.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
7c87068f4378906bfe5945f8009b5d88
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br
_version_ 1791083571374456832