Ethics in social sciences researches: regulation, scientific practices and controversies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Daniela Alves de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Teixeira, Wanessa Milagres
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Educação e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170818
Resumo: This study results from the mapping, done by means of the analysis of documents and news available in files or at the web, of scientific controversies related to the regulation of the ethics in research with human participants in Brazil. Thus, it presents the controversies related to the regulation of ethics in research with human participants in Brazil, since the implementation and operationalization of bioethics principles with the Federal Resolution 01/1988, and the successive legal changes over time till the visibility of the controversies in relation to the Humanities, Social and Social Applied Sciences (CHSSA). Later, it will present the controversies resulting from that measure and the unfolding of the public debate between CONEP and the actors of CHSSA present at the Human Sciences Work Group till the advent of the Resolution CNS 510/2016. Finally, it will present the following specificities of the research in human and social sciences and their implications to the ethic dimension: argumentative, relational and subjective logic; transparence; vulnerability, and protection of the participants. The conclusion is that the ethic dimension of the research is not separated from the methodologic dimension of each field of knowledge. Besides, it was verified that the alignment of the researchers in human and social sciences in the net of the ethic regulation is fragile.
id USP-11_a283d3caa3336b84962f62c9bdfa5a6f
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/170818
network_acronym_str USP-11
network_name_str Educação e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Ethics in social sciences researches: regulation, scientific practices and controversiesÉtica em pesquisa em ciências sociais: regulamentação, prática científica e controvérsiasResearch ethicsEthical regulationSocial sciencesÉtica em pesquisaRegulamentação éticaCiências sociaisThis study results from the mapping, done by means of the analysis of documents and news available in files or at the web, of scientific controversies related to the regulation of the ethics in research with human participants in Brazil. Thus, it presents the controversies related to the regulation of ethics in research with human participants in Brazil, since the implementation and operationalization of bioethics principles with the Federal Resolution 01/1988, and the successive legal changes over time till the visibility of the controversies in relation to the Humanities, Social and Social Applied Sciences (CHSSA). Later, it will present the controversies resulting from that measure and the unfolding of the public debate between CONEP and the actors of CHSSA present at the Human Sciences Work Group till the advent of the Resolution CNS 510/2016. Finally, it will present the following specificities of the research in human and social sciences and their implications to the ethic dimension: argumentative, relational and subjective logic; transparence; vulnerability, and protection of the participants. The conclusion is that the ethic dimension of the research is not separated from the methodologic dimension of each field of knowledge. Besides, it was verified that the alignment of the researchers in human and social sciences in the net of the ethic regulation is fragile.O texto é resultado do mapeamento, feito por meio da análise de documentos e notícias disponíveis em arquivo ou na web, de controvérsias científicas a respeito da regulamentação da ética em pesquisa com seres humanos no Brasil. Apresentam-se as controvérsias referentes à regulamentação da ética em pesquisa com seres humanos no Brasil, desde a implementação e operacionalização de princípios bioéticos com a Resolução 01/1988, e as sucessivas mudanças legais ao longo do tempo até a visibilização das controvérsias em relação às Ciências Humanas, Sociais e Sociais Aplicadas (CHSSA). Em um segundo momento, são apresentadas as controvérsias advindas dessa medida e o desenrolar do debate público entre a CONEP e os atores das CHSSA presentes no GT Ciências Humanas até o advento da resolução CNS510/2016. Por fim, são apresentadas as seguintes especificidades da pesquisa em ciências humanas e sociais e suas implicações para a dimensão ética: lógica argumentativa, relacional e intersubjetiva, transparência, vulnerabilidade e proteção aos participantes. Conclui-se que a dimensão ética da pesquisa não é separada da dimensão metodológica de cada campo do conhecimento. Além disso, constatou-se que o alinhamento dos pesquisadores em ciências humanas e sociais na rede da regulamentação ética é frágil.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação2021-06-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170818Educação e Pesquisa; v. 46 (2020); e217376Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 46 (2020); e217376Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 46 (2020); e2173761678-46341517-9702reponame:Educação e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170818/161190https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170818/161192https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170818/161193Copyright (c) 2020 Educação e Pesquisahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Daniela Alves deTeixeira, Wanessa Milagres2021-06-14T21:56:24Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/170818Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/oai||revedu@usp.br1678-46341517-9702opendoar:2021-06-14T21:56:24Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ethics in social sciences researches: regulation, scientific practices and controversies
Ética em pesquisa em ciências sociais: regulamentação, prática científica e controvérsias
title Ethics in social sciences researches: regulation, scientific practices and controversies
spellingShingle Ethics in social sciences researches: regulation, scientific practices and controversies
Alves, Daniela Alves de
Research ethics
Ethical regulation
Social sciences
Ética em pesquisa
Regulamentação ética
Ciências sociais
title_short Ethics in social sciences researches: regulation, scientific practices and controversies
title_full Ethics in social sciences researches: regulation, scientific practices and controversies
title_fullStr Ethics in social sciences researches: regulation, scientific practices and controversies
title_full_unstemmed Ethics in social sciences researches: regulation, scientific practices and controversies
title_sort Ethics in social sciences researches: regulation, scientific practices and controversies
author Alves, Daniela Alves de
author_facet Alves, Daniela Alves de
Teixeira, Wanessa Milagres
author_role author
author2 Teixeira, Wanessa Milagres
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Daniela Alves de
Teixeira, Wanessa Milagres
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Research ethics
Ethical regulation
Social sciences
Ética em pesquisa
Regulamentação ética
Ciências sociais
topic Research ethics
Ethical regulation
Social sciences
Ética em pesquisa
Regulamentação ética
Ciências sociais
description This study results from the mapping, done by means of the analysis of documents and news available in files or at the web, of scientific controversies related to the regulation of the ethics in research with human participants in Brazil. Thus, it presents the controversies related to the regulation of ethics in research with human participants in Brazil, since the implementation and operationalization of bioethics principles with the Federal Resolution 01/1988, and the successive legal changes over time till the visibility of the controversies in relation to the Humanities, Social and Social Applied Sciences (CHSSA). Later, it will present the controversies resulting from that measure and the unfolding of the public debate between CONEP and the actors of CHSSA present at the Human Sciences Work Group till the advent of the Resolution CNS 510/2016. Finally, it will present the following specificities of the research in human and social sciences and their implications to the ethic dimension: argumentative, relational and subjective logic; transparence; vulnerability, and protection of the participants. The conclusion is that the ethic dimension of the research is not separated from the methodologic dimension of each field of knowledge. Besides, it was verified that the alignment of the researchers in human and social sciences in the net of the ethic regulation is fragile.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170818
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170818
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170818/161190
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170818/161192
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170818/161193
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Educação e Pesquisa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Educação e Pesquisa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa; v. 46 (2020); e217376
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 46 (2020); e217376
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 46 (2020); e217376
1678-4634
1517-9702
reponame:Educação e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Educação e Pesquisa
collection Educação e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revedu@usp.br
_version_ 1787713813674459136