Literacy is more than teaching a code: discourse and authorship in language teaching

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cerdas, Luciene
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Educação e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/204575
Resumo: This article aims to discuss the use of the phonic method in literacy, preconized, in the midst of a “methods quarrel,” as the only evidence-based way to teach literacy. Although this discussion is not recent, from 2019 on, it gains strength by integrating the National Literacy Policy (PNA) [Portuguese acronym of the name], in a very controversial moment regarding the directions of education in the country. In this context, the discussion proposed here is based on the dialogue with authors such as Cecília Goulart, Magda Soares, João Wanderley Geraldi, among others who have dedicated their studies to literacy and contributed to the expansion of the debate on teaching of the mother tongue. Supported by these authors and by the Bakhtinian perspective on language, this article also presents pedagogical practices performed by undergraduate students of the Pedagogy course at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) in the scope of the extension project “The school-university partnership in children’s literacy and the initial training of literacy teachers”, through which they are inserted into the daily life of public schools and participate in the planning and development of didactic projects focused on children’s literacy. From the proposed discussions in this article and the performance of the undergraduates, one can glimpse practices based on the discursiveness of human relations, which are shown to be potent for the valorization of children’s voices, their authorship as readers and writers, and their protagonism in the literacy process, seeking to expand their repertoire of cultural practices of reading and writing and their formation as socio-historical and cultural subjects in the struggle for social inclusion.
id USP-11_c072ffcdbb67095eb141653928c5de30
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/204575
network_acronym_str USP-11
network_name_str Educação e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Literacy is more than teaching a code: discourse and authorship in language teachingAlfabetizar é mais que ensinar um código: discurso e autoria no ensino da línguaAlfabetizaçãoPerspectiva discursivaEnsino de língua maternaPráticas de alfabetizaçãoLiteracyDiscursive perspectiveTeaching mother tongueLiteracy practicesThis article aims to discuss the use of the phonic method in literacy, preconized, in the midst of a “methods quarrel,” as the only evidence-based way to teach literacy. Although this discussion is not recent, from 2019 on, it gains strength by integrating the National Literacy Policy (PNA) [Portuguese acronym of the name], in a very controversial moment regarding the directions of education in the country. In this context, the discussion proposed here is based on the dialogue with authors such as Cecília Goulart, Magda Soares, João Wanderley Geraldi, among others who have dedicated their studies to literacy and contributed to the expansion of the debate on teaching of the mother tongue. Supported by these authors and by the Bakhtinian perspective on language, this article also presents pedagogical practices performed by undergraduate students of the Pedagogy course at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) in the scope of the extension project “The school-university partnership in children’s literacy and the initial training of literacy teachers”, through which they are inserted into the daily life of public schools and participate in the planning and development of didactic projects focused on children’s literacy. From the proposed discussions in this article and the performance of the undergraduates, one can glimpse practices based on the discursiveness of human relations, which are shown to be potent for the valorization of children’s voices, their authorship as readers and writers, and their protagonism in the literacy process, seeking to expand their repertoire of cultural practices of reading and writing and their formation as socio-historical and cultural subjects in the struggle for social inclusion.Este artigo tem como objetivo discutir o uso do método fônico na alfabetização, preconizado, em meio a uma “querela dos métodos”, como o único caminho baseado em evidências científicas para alfabetizar. Apesar dessa discussão não ser recente, a partir de 2019, ela ganha força ao integrar a Política Nacional de Alfabetização (PNA), em um momento bastante controverso quanto aos rumos da educação no país. Nesse contexto, a discussão proposta aqui se dá a partir do diálogo com autores como Cecília Goulart, Magda Soares, João Wanderley Geraldi, entre outros que têm se dedicado ao estudo da alfabetização e contribuído na ampliação do debate sobre o ensino da língua materna. Ancorado nesses autores e nos conhecimentos da perspectiva bakhtiniana sobre linguagem, este artigo apresenta práticas pedagógicas realizadas por licenciandos do curso de pedagogia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) no âmbito do projeto de extensão “A parceria escola e universidade na alfabetização das crianças e na formação inicial de alfabetizadores”, por meio do qual eles se inserem no cotidiano das escolas públicas e participam do planejamento e desenvolvimento de projetos didáticos voltados à alfabetização das crianças. A partir das discussões propostas neste artigo e da atuação dos licenciandos, vislumbram-se práticas fundamentadas na discursividade própria das relações humanas, que se mostram potentes pela valorização da voz das crianças, de sua autoria como leitoras e escritoras e de seu protagonismo no processo de alfabetização, visando à ampliação do seu repertório de práticas culturais de leitura e escrita e sua formação como sujeitos sócio-históricos e culturais na luta pela inclusão social.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação2022-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/20457510.1590/S1678-4634202248240660porEducação e Pesquisa; v. 48 n. contínuo (2022): Educação e Pesquisa; e240660Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 48 No. contínuo (2022): Educação e Pesquisa; e240660Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 48 Núm. contínuo (2022): Educação e Pesquisa; e2406601678-46341517-9702reponame:Educação e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/204575/188177https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/204575/188175https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/204575/188174Copyright (c) 2022 Educação e Pesquisahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCerdas, Luciene 2022-11-17T19:19:38Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/204575Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/oai||revedu@usp.br1678-46341517-9702opendoar:2022-11-17T19:19:38Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Literacy is more than teaching a code: discourse and authorship in language teaching
Alfabetizar é mais que ensinar um código: discurso e autoria no ensino da língua
title Literacy is more than teaching a code: discourse and authorship in language teaching
spellingShingle Literacy is more than teaching a code: discourse and authorship in language teaching
Cerdas, Luciene
Alfabetização
Perspectiva discursiva
Ensino de língua materna
Práticas de alfabetização
Literacy
Discursive perspective
Teaching mother tongue
Literacy practices
title_short Literacy is more than teaching a code: discourse and authorship in language teaching
title_full Literacy is more than teaching a code: discourse and authorship in language teaching
title_fullStr Literacy is more than teaching a code: discourse and authorship in language teaching
title_full_unstemmed Literacy is more than teaching a code: discourse and authorship in language teaching
title_sort Literacy is more than teaching a code: discourse and authorship in language teaching
author Cerdas, Luciene
author_facet Cerdas, Luciene
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cerdas, Luciene
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alfabetização
Perspectiva discursiva
Ensino de língua materna
Práticas de alfabetização
Literacy
Discursive perspective
Teaching mother tongue
Literacy practices
topic Alfabetização
Perspectiva discursiva
Ensino de língua materna
Práticas de alfabetização
Literacy
Discursive perspective
Teaching mother tongue
Literacy practices
description This article aims to discuss the use of the phonic method in literacy, preconized, in the midst of a “methods quarrel,” as the only evidence-based way to teach literacy. Although this discussion is not recent, from 2019 on, it gains strength by integrating the National Literacy Policy (PNA) [Portuguese acronym of the name], in a very controversial moment regarding the directions of education in the country. In this context, the discussion proposed here is based on the dialogue with authors such as Cecília Goulart, Magda Soares, João Wanderley Geraldi, among others who have dedicated their studies to literacy and contributed to the expansion of the debate on teaching of the mother tongue. Supported by these authors and by the Bakhtinian perspective on language, this article also presents pedagogical practices performed by undergraduate students of the Pedagogy course at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) in the scope of the extension project “The school-university partnership in children’s literacy and the initial training of literacy teachers”, through which they are inserted into the daily life of public schools and participate in the planning and development of didactic projects focused on children’s literacy. From the proposed discussions in this article and the performance of the undergraduates, one can glimpse practices based on the discursiveness of human relations, which are shown to be potent for the valorization of children’s voices, their authorship as readers and writers, and their protagonism in the literacy process, seeking to expand their repertoire of cultural practices of reading and writing and their formation as socio-historical and cultural subjects in the struggle for social inclusion.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/204575
10.1590/S1678-4634202248240660por
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/204575
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-4634202248240660por
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/204575/188177
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/204575/188175
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/204575/188174
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Educação e Pesquisa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Educação e Pesquisa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa; v. 48 n. contínuo (2022): Educação e Pesquisa; e240660
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 48 No. contínuo (2022): Educação e Pesquisa; e240660
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 48 Núm. contínuo (2022): Educação e Pesquisa; e240660
1678-4634
1517-9702
reponame:Educação e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Educação e Pesquisa
collection Educação e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revedu@usp.br
_version_ 1787713815212720128