In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Orosco,Fernando Accorsi
Publication Date: 2012
Other Authors: Bernardineli,Norberti, Garcia,Roberto Brandão, Bramante,Clovis Monteiro, Duarte,Marco Antonio Húngaro, Moraes,Ivaldo Gomes de
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572012000500005
Summary: OBJECTIVES: To compare, in vivo, the accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in determining root canal working length. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five maxillary incisor or canine teeth from 22 patients were used in this study. Considering the preoperative radiographs as the baseline, a 25 K file was inserted into the root canal to the point where the Root ZX electronic apex locator indicated the APEX measurement in the screen. From this measurement, 1 mm was subtracted for positioning the file. The radiographic measurements were made using a digital sensor (Digora 1.51) or conventional type-E films, size 2, following the paralleling technique, to determine the distance of the file tip and the radiographic apex. RESULTS: The Student "t" test indicated mean distances of 1.11 mm to conventional and 1.20 mm for the digital method and indicated a significant statistical difference (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The conventional radiographic method was found to be superior to the digital one in determining the working length of the root canal.
id USP-17_15293f1d7a5cc40854efd22db3773191
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-77572012000500005
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZXRadiographyOdontometryOBJECTIVES: To compare, in vivo, the accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in determining root canal working length. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five maxillary incisor or canine teeth from 22 patients were used in this study. Considering the preoperative radiographs as the baseline, a 25 K file was inserted into the root canal to the point where the Root ZX electronic apex locator indicated the APEX measurement in the screen. From this measurement, 1 mm was subtracted for positioning the file. The radiographic measurements were made using a digital sensor (Digora 1.51) or conventional type-E films, size 2, following the paralleling technique, to determine the distance of the file tip and the radiographic apex. RESULTS: The Student "t" test indicated mean distances of 1.11 mm to conventional and 1.20 mm for the digital method and indicated a significant statistical difference (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The conventional radiographic method was found to be superior to the digital one in determining the working length of the root canal.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2012-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572012000500005Journal of Applied Oral Science v.20 n.5 2012reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S1678-77572012000500005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOrosco,Fernando AccorsiBernardineli,NorbertiGarcia,Roberto BrandãoBramante,Clovis MonteiroDuarte,Marco Antonio HúngaroMoraes,Ivaldo Gomes deeng2012-11-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572012000500005Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-11-06T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX
title In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX
spellingShingle In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX
Orosco,Fernando Accorsi
Radiography
Odontometry
title_short In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX
title_full In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX
title_fullStr In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX
title_full_unstemmed In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX
title_sort In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX
author Orosco,Fernando Accorsi
author_facet Orosco,Fernando Accorsi
Bernardineli,Norberti
Garcia,Roberto Brandão
Bramante,Clovis Monteiro
Duarte,Marco Antonio Húngaro
Moraes,Ivaldo Gomes de
author_role author
author2 Bernardineli,Norberti
Garcia,Roberto Brandão
Bramante,Clovis Monteiro
Duarte,Marco Antonio Húngaro
Moraes,Ivaldo Gomes de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Orosco,Fernando Accorsi
Bernardineli,Norberti
Garcia,Roberto Brandão
Bramante,Clovis Monteiro
Duarte,Marco Antonio Húngaro
Moraes,Ivaldo Gomes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Radiography
Odontometry
topic Radiography
Odontometry
description OBJECTIVES: To compare, in vivo, the accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in determining root canal working length. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five maxillary incisor or canine teeth from 22 patients were used in this study. Considering the preoperative radiographs as the baseline, a 25 K file was inserted into the root canal to the point where the Root ZX electronic apex locator indicated the APEX measurement in the screen. From this measurement, 1 mm was subtracted for positioning the file. The radiographic measurements were made using a digital sensor (Digora 1.51) or conventional type-E films, size 2, following the paralleling technique, to determine the distance of the file tip and the radiographic apex. RESULTS: The Student "t" test indicated mean distances of 1.11 mm to conventional and 1.20 mm for the digital method and indicated a significant statistical difference (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The conventional radiographic method was found to be superior to the digital one in determining the working length of the root canal.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572012000500005
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572012000500005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572012000500005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science v.20 n.5 2012
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1748936437493923840