Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Allan Carlos Araújo de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Amorim, Klinger de Souza, Nascimento Júnior, Edmundo Marques do, Duarte, Amanda Caroline Batista, Groppo, Francisco Carlos, Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari, Souza, Liane Maciel de Almeida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/158643
Resumo: Pain due to administration of local anesthetics is the primary reason for patients’ fear and anxiety, and various methods are used to minimize it. This study aimed to measure the degree of pain during administration of anesthesia and determine the latency time and duration of pulpal anesthesia using two anesthetic methods in the maxilla. Materials and Methods: A randomized, single-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted with 41 volunteers who required class I restorations in the maxillary first molars. Local anesthesia was administered with a needleless jet injection system (experimental group) or with a carpule syringe (control) using a 30-gauge short needle. The method of anesthesia and laterality of the maxilla were randomized. A pulp electric tester measured the latency time and duration of anesthesia in the second molar. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the degree of pain during the anesthetic method. Data were tabulated and then analyzed by a statistician. The t-test was used to analyze the differences between the groups for basal electrical stimulation. Duration of anesthesia and degree of pain were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. A 5% significance level was considered. Results: There was no statistical difference in the basal electrical stimulation threshold (mA) and degree of pain between the two methods of anesthesia (p>0.05). Latency time was 2 minutes for all subjects. The duration of pulpal anesthesia showed no statistical difference (minutes) between the two methods (p<0.001), with a longer duration for the traditional method of anesthesia (median of 40 minutes). Conclusions: The two anesthetics methods did not differ concerning the pain experienced during anesthesia. Latency lasted 2 minutes for all subjects; the traditional infiltration anesthesia resulted in a longer anesthetic duration compared with the needleless jet injection.
id USP-17_4cf6d59ccfd9996c1f7180251c26f8ff
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/158643
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trialAnesthesiadentalDental pulpPainPain due to administration of local anesthetics is the primary reason for patients’ fear and anxiety, and various methods are used to minimize it. This study aimed to measure the degree of pain during administration of anesthesia and determine the latency time and duration of pulpal anesthesia using two anesthetic methods in the maxilla. Materials and Methods: A randomized, single-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted with 41 volunteers who required class I restorations in the maxillary first molars. Local anesthesia was administered with a needleless jet injection system (experimental group) or with a carpule syringe (control) using a 30-gauge short needle. The method of anesthesia and laterality of the maxilla were randomized. A pulp electric tester measured the latency time and duration of anesthesia in the second molar. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the degree of pain during the anesthetic method. Data were tabulated and then analyzed by a statistician. The t-test was used to analyze the differences between the groups for basal electrical stimulation. Duration of anesthesia and degree of pain were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. A 5% significance level was considered. Results: There was no statistical difference in the basal electrical stimulation threshold (mA) and degree of pain between the two methods of anesthesia (p>0.05). Latency time was 2 minutes for all subjects. The duration of pulpal anesthesia showed no statistical difference (minutes) between the two methods (p<0.001), with a longer duration for the traditional method of anesthesia (median of 40 minutes). Conclusions: The two anesthetics methods did not differ concerning the pain experienced during anesthesia. Latency lasted 2 minutes for all subjects; the traditional infiltration anesthesia resulted in a longer anesthetic duration compared with the needleless jet injection.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2019-06-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/15864310.1590/1678-7757-2018-0195Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 27 (2019); e20180195Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 27 (2019); e20180195Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 27 (2019); e201801951678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/158643/153653Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Allan Carlos Araújo deAmorim, Klinger de SouzaNascimento Júnior, Edmundo Marques doDuarte, Amanda Caroline BatistaGroppo, Francisco CarlosTakeshita, Wilton MitsunariSouza, Liane Maciel de Almeida2019-06-06T16:06:27Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/158643Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2019-06-06T16:06:27Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
title Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
Oliveira, Allan Carlos Araújo de
Anesthesia
dental
Dental pulp
Pain
title_short Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
author Oliveira, Allan Carlos Araújo de
author_facet Oliveira, Allan Carlos Araújo de
Amorim, Klinger de Souza
Nascimento Júnior, Edmundo Marques do
Duarte, Amanda Caroline Batista
Groppo, Francisco Carlos
Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari
Souza, Liane Maciel de Almeida
author_role author
author2 Amorim, Klinger de Souza
Nascimento Júnior, Edmundo Marques do
Duarte, Amanda Caroline Batista
Groppo, Francisco Carlos
Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari
Souza, Liane Maciel de Almeida
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Allan Carlos Araújo de
Amorim, Klinger de Souza
Nascimento Júnior, Edmundo Marques do
Duarte, Amanda Caroline Batista
Groppo, Francisco Carlos
Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari
Souza, Liane Maciel de Almeida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anesthesia
dental
Dental pulp
Pain
topic Anesthesia
dental
Dental pulp
Pain
description Pain due to administration of local anesthetics is the primary reason for patients’ fear and anxiety, and various methods are used to minimize it. This study aimed to measure the degree of pain during administration of anesthesia and determine the latency time and duration of pulpal anesthesia using two anesthetic methods in the maxilla. Materials and Methods: A randomized, single-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted with 41 volunteers who required class I restorations in the maxillary first molars. Local anesthesia was administered with a needleless jet injection system (experimental group) or with a carpule syringe (control) using a 30-gauge short needle. The method of anesthesia and laterality of the maxilla were randomized. A pulp electric tester measured the latency time and duration of anesthesia in the second molar. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the degree of pain during the anesthetic method. Data were tabulated and then analyzed by a statistician. The t-test was used to analyze the differences between the groups for basal electrical stimulation. Duration of anesthesia and degree of pain were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. A 5% significance level was considered. Results: There was no statistical difference in the basal electrical stimulation threshold (mA) and degree of pain between the two methods of anesthesia (p>0.05). Latency time was 2 minutes for all subjects. The duration of pulpal anesthesia showed no statistical difference (minutes) between the two methods (p<0.001), with a longer duration for the traditional method of anesthesia (median of 40 minutes). Conclusions: The two anesthetics methods did not differ concerning the pain experienced during anesthesia. Latency lasted 2 minutes for all subjects; the traditional infiltration anesthesia resulted in a longer anesthetic duration compared with the needleless jet injection.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/158643
10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0195
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/158643
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0195
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/158643/153653
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 27 (2019); e20180195
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 27 (2019); e20180195
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 27 (2019); e20180195
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1787713195804196864