Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: PEREIRA,Jefferson Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: ROSA,Ricardo Abreu da, SÓ,Marcus Vinícius Reis, AFONSO,Daniele, KUGA,Milton Carlos, HONÓRIO,Heitor Marques, VALLE,Accácio Lins do, VIDOTTI,Hugo Alberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572014000500390
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentin after cementation with glass ionomer (GICs) and resinmodified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty human maxillary canines were transversally sectioned at 15 mm from the apex. Canals were prepared with a step back technique until the application of a #55 K-file and filled. Post spaces were prepared and specimens were divided into five groups according to the cement used for post cementation: Luting & Lining Cement; Fuji II LC Improved; RelyX Luting; Ketac Cem; and Ionoseal. After cementation of the glass fiber posts, all roots were stored at 100% humidity until testing. For push-out test, 1-mm thick slices were produced. The push-out test was performed in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute and the values (MPa) were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene's tests and by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Fiber posts cemented using Luting & Lining Cement, Fuji II LC Improved, and Ketac Cem presented the highest bond strength to root dentin, followed by RelyX Luting. Ionoseal presented the lowest bond strength values (P>0.05). The post level did not influence the bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin (P=0.148). The major cause of failure was cohesive at the cement for all GICs and RMGICs. CONCLUSIONS: Except for Ionoseal, all cements provided satisfactory bond strength values.
id USP-17_4fe85ffca010ed9431a4a41e84466b73
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-77572014000500390
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cementsEndodonticsPost and core techniqueDental cementsGlass ionomer cementsShear strength OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentin after cementation with glass ionomer (GICs) and resinmodified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty human maxillary canines were transversally sectioned at 15 mm from the apex. Canals were prepared with a step back technique until the application of a #55 K-file and filled. Post spaces were prepared and specimens were divided into five groups according to the cement used for post cementation: Luting & Lining Cement; Fuji II LC Improved; RelyX Luting; Ketac Cem; and Ionoseal. After cementation of the glass fiber posts, all roots were stored at 100% humidity until testing. For push-out test, 1-mm thick slices were produced. The push-out test was performed in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute and the values (MPa) were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene's tests and by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Fiber posts cemented using Luting & Lining Cement, Fuji II LC Improved, and Ketac Cem presented the highest bond strength to root dentin, followed by RelyX Luting. Ionoseal presented the lowest bond strength values (P>0.05). The post level did not influence the bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin (P=0.148). The major cause of failure was cohesive at the cement for all GICs and RMGICs. CONCLUSIONS: Except for Ionoseal, all cements provided satisfactory bond strength values. Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2014-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572014000500390Journal of Applied Oral Science v.22 n.5 2014reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/1678-775720130466info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPEREIRA,Jefferson RicardoROSA,Ricardo Abreu daSÓ,Marcus Vinícius ReisAFONSO,DanieleKUGA,Milton CarlosHONÓRIO,Heitor MarquesVALLE,Accácio Lins doVIDOTTI,Hugo Albertoeng2015-01-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572014000500390Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2015-01-07T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements
title Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements
spellingShingle Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements
PEREIRA,Jefferson Ricardo
Endodontics
Post and core technique
Dental cements
Glass ionomer cements
Shear strength
title_short Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements
title_full Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements
title_fullStr Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements
title_full_unstemmed Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements
title_sort Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements
author PEREIRA,Jefferson Ricardo
author_facet PEREIRA,Jefferson Ricardo
ROSA,Ricardo Abreu da
SÓ,Marcus Vinícius Reis
AFONSO,Daniele
KUGA,Milton Carlos
HONÓRIO,Heitor Marques
VALLE,Accácio Lins do
VIDOTTI,Hugo Alberto
author_role author
author2 ROSA,Ricardo Abreu da
SÓ,Marcus Vinícius Reis
AFONSO,Daniele
KUGA,Milton Carlos
HONÓRIO,Heitor Marques
VALLE,Accácio Lins do
VIDOTTI,Hugo Alberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PEREIRA,Jefferson Ricardo
ROSA,Ricardo Abreu da
SÓ,Marcus Vinícius Reis
AFONSO,Daniele
KUGA,Milton Carlos
HONÓRIO,Heitor Marques
VALLE,Accácio Lins do
VIDOTTI,Hugo Alberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endodontics
Post and core technique
Dental cements
Glass ionomer cements
Shear strength
topic Endodontics
Post and core technique
Dental cements
Glass ionomer cements
Shear strength
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentin after cementation with glass ionomer (GICs) and resinmodified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty human maxillary canines were transversally sectioned at 15 mm from the apex. Canals were prepared with a step back technique until the application of a #55 K-file and filled. Post spaces were prepared and specimens were divided into five groups according to the cement used for post cementation: Luting & Lining Cement; Fuji II LC Improved; RelyX Luting; Ketac Cem; and Ionoseal. After cementation of the glass fiber posts, all roots were stored at 100% humidity until testing. For push-out test, 1-mm thick slices were produced. The push-out test was performed in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute and the values (MPa) were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene's tests and by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Fiber posts cemented using Luting & Lining Cement, Fuji II LC Improved, and Ketac Cem presented the highest bond strength to root dentin, followed by RelyX Luting. Ionoseal presented the lowest bond strength values (P>0.05). The post level did not influence the bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin (P=0.148). The major cause of failure was cohesive at the cement for all GICs and RMGICs. CONCLUSIONS: Except for Ionoseal, all cements provided satisfactory bond strength values.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572014000500390
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572014000500390
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-775720130466
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science v.22 n.5 2014
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1748936438196469760