TiF 4 varnish protects the retention of brackets to enamel after in vitro mild erosive challenge

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Carlo, Hugo Lemes, Santos, Rogério Lacerda dos, Sousa, Frederico Barbosa, Castro, Ricardo Dias de, França, Renata Cristina Sobreira, Carvalho, Fabíola Galbiatti de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/201484
Resumo: The effect of fluoride agents on the retention of orthodontic brackets to enamel under erosive challenge is little investigated. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of titanium tetrafluoride (TiF<i>4</i>) and sodium fluoride (NaF) agents on the shear bond strength of brackets to enamel and on the enamel microhardness around brackets under erosive challenge. Methods: Brackets were bonded to bovine incisors. Five groups were formed according to fluoride application (n=10): TiF<i>4</i> varnish, TiF<i>4</i> solution, NaF varnish, NaF solution and control (without application). The specimens were submitted to erosive challenge (90 s cola drink/2h artificial saliva, 4x per day for 7 days). Solutions were applied before each erosive cycle and varnishes were applied once. Vickers Microhardness (VHN) was obtained before and after all cycles of erosion and the percentage of microhardness loss was calculated. Shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index and polarized light microscopy were conducted after erosion. The data were analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05). Results: The %VHN had no statistically significant differences among the experimental groups. However, considering the comparisons of all groups with the control group, TiF<i>4</i> varnish showed the highest protection from enamel demineralization (effect size of 2.94, while the effect size for the other groups was >2.4). The TiF<i>4</i> varnish group had significantly higher shear bond strength compared to other groups. There was no difference among groups for adhesive remnant index. Polarized light microscopy showed higher demineralization depth for the control group. Conclusions: Application of NaF and TiF<i>4</i> agents during mild erosive challenge minimized the enamel mineral loss around brackets, however only the experimental TiF<i>4</i> varnish was able to prevent the reduction of shear bond strength of brackets to enamel.
id USP-17_6d84ed2a305d7f7519d13af9ea7aa007
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/201484
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling TiF 4 varnish protects the retention of brackets to enamel after in vitro mild erosive challengeBracketsFluoridesShear bond strengthTooth erosionThe effect of fluoride agents on the retention of orthodontic brackets to enamel under erosive challenge is little investigated. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of titanium tetrafluoride (TiF<i>4</i>) and sodium fluoride (NaF) agents on the shear bond strength of brackets to enamel and on the enamel microhardness around brackets under erosive challenge. Methods: Brackets were bonded to bovine incisors. Five groups were formed according to fluoride application (n=10): TiF<i>4</i> varnish, TiF<i>4</i> solution, NaF varnish, NaF solution and control (without application). The specimens were submitted to erosive challenge (90 s cola drink/2h artificial saliva, 4x per day for 7 days). Solutions were applied before each erosive cycle and varnishes were applied once. Vickers Microhardness (VHN) was obtained before and after all cycles of erosion and the percentage of microhardness loss was calculated. Shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index and polarized light microscopy were conducted after erosion. The data were analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05). Results: The %VHN had no statistically significant differences among the experimental groups. However, considering the comparisons of all groups with the control group, TiF<i>4</i> varnish showed the highest protection from enamel demineralization (effect size of 2.94, while the effect size for the other groups was >2.4). The TiF<i>4</i> varnish group had significantly higher shear bond strength compared to other groups. There was no difference among groups for adhesive remnant index. Polarized light microscopy showed higher demineralization depth for the control group. Conclusions: Application of NaF and TiF<i>4</i> agents during mild erosive challenge minimized the enamel mineral loss around brackets, however only the experimental TiF<i>4</i> varnish was able to prevent the reduction of shear bond strength of brackets to enamel.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2022-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/20148410.1590/1678-7757-2017-0222Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 26 (2018); e20170222Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 26 (2018); e20170222Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 26 (2018); e201702221678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/201484/185561Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Applied Oral Sciencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas deCarlo, Hugo LemesSantos, Rogério Lacerda dosSousa, Frederico BarbosaCastro, Ricardo Dias deFrança, Renata Cristina SobreiraCarvalho, Fabíola Galbiatti de2022-08-25T19:17:57Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/201484Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2022-08-25T19:17:57Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TiF 4 varnish protects the retention of brackets to enamel after in vitro mild erosive challenge
title TiF 4 varnish protects the retention of brackets to enamel after in vitro mild erosive challenge
spellingShingle TiF 4 varnish protects the retention of brackets to enamel after in vitro mild erosive challenge
Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas de
Brackets
Fluorides
Shear bond strength
Tooth erosion
title_short TiF 4 varnish protects the retention of brackets to enamel after in vitro mild erosive challenge
title_full TiF 4 varnish protects the retention of brackets to enamel after in vitro mild erosive challenge
title_fullStr TiF 4 varnish protects the retention of brackets to enamel after in vitro mild erosive challenge
title_full_unstemmed TiF 4 varnish protects the retention of brackets to enamel after in vitro mild erosive challenge
title_sort TiF 4 varnish protects the retention of brackets to enamel after in vitro mild erosive challenge
author Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas de
author_facet Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas de
Carlo, Hugo Lemes
Santos, Rogério Lacerda dos
Sousa, Frederico Barbosa
Castro, Ricardo Dias de
França, Renata Cristina Sobreira
Carvalho, Fabíola Galbiatti de
author_role author
author2 Carlo, Hugo Lemes
Santos, Rogério Lacerda dos
Sousa, Frederico Barbosa
Castro, Ricardo Dias de
França, Renata Cristina Sobreira
Carvalho, Fabíola Galbiatti de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas de
Carlo, Hugo Lemes
Santos, Rogério Lacerda dos
Sousa, Frederico Barbosa
Castro, Ricardo Dias de
França, Renata Cristina Sobreira
Carvalho, Fabíola Galbiatti de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brackets
Fluorides
Shear bond strength
Tooth erosion
topic Brackets
Fluorides
Shear bond strength
Tooth erosion
description The effect of fluoride agents on the retention of orthodontic brackets to enamel under erosive challenge is little investigated. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of titanium tetrafluoride (TiF<i>4</i>) and sodium fluoride (NaF) agents on the shear bond strength of brackets to enamel and on the enamel microhardness around brackets under erosive challenge. Methods: Brackets were bonded to bovine incisors. Five groups were formed according to fluoride application (n=10): TiF<i>4</i> varnish, TiF<i>4</i> solution, NaF varnish, NaF solution and control (without application). The specimens were submitted to erosive challenge (90 s cola drink/2h artificial saliva, 4x per day for 7 days). Solutions were applied before each erosive cycle and varnishes were applied once. Vickers Microhardness (VHN) was obtained before and after all cycles of erosion and the percentage of microhardness loss was calculated. Shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index and polarized light microscopy were conducted after erosion. The data were analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05). Results: The %VHN had no statistically significant differences among the experimental groups. However, considering the comparisons of all groups with the control group, TiF<i>4</i> varnish showed the highest protection from enamel demineralization (effect size of 2.94, while the effect size for the other groups was >2.4). The TiF<i>4</i> varnish group had significantly higher shear bond strength compared to other groups. There was no difference among groups for adhesive remnant index. Polarized light microscopy showed higher demineralization depth for the control group. Conclusions: Application of NaF and TiF<i>4</i> agents during mild erosive challenge minimized the enamel mineral loss around brackets, however only the experimental TiF<i>4</i> varnish was able to prevent the reduction of shear bond strength of brackets to enamel.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/201484
10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0222
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/201484
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0222
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/201484/185561
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Applied Oral Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Applied Oral Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 26 (2018); e20170222
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 26 (2018); e20170222
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 26 (2018); e20170222
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1787713197493452800