The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Luciana Valadares
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz, Henriques, Guilherme Elias Pessanha, Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek, Fragoso, Wagner Sotero
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3387
Resumo: PURPOSE: Difficulty in cleaning resilient denture liners remains a material disadvantage. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of denture cleansers on hardness of resilient liner materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three resilient liners, Luci Sof® (Dentsply), Molloplast-B® (Dentax), and Sofreliner® (Tokuyama), and two denture cleansers, Efferdent® (Warner-Lamber), and 0.5% alkaline hypochlorite preparation were used. Twenty specimens of each material were prepared, measuring 25X15X3mm. Two denture cleansing approaches were used: 1) alkaline hypochlorite, for 20 minutes; 2) alkaline peroxide, for 30 minutes. This procedure was repeated 8 times a day, during 90 days. The specimens were evaluated before and after 360 and 720 cycles, to simulate 1 and 2 years of clinical cleaning procedures, respectively. The Shore A hardness was evaluated in a durometer (Teclock GS-709A), with a penetrating load of 10N for 1 second. Any macroscopic changes, such as loss of color or alteration in surface texture were recorded by one observer. All numeric data were subject to ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Tukey's test (alpha= 0.05). RESULTS: All materials were significantly different, independently to time and treatment. Initially, Luci Sof® and Sofreliner® immersed in either hypochlorite or peroxide increased the hardness mean values significantly. These hardness mean values decreased significantly after 720 cycles. Molloplast-B® showed no significant difference after the treatments, in any time. CONCLUSIONS: Denture cleansers had no effect on hardness of the resilient denture liners evaluated after 2 years of in vivo simulated conditions of hygiene. Sofreliner® was the smoothest material before and after all treatments.
id USP-17_a9ff8a0090baa05bb0a56738dd14957f
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3387
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners Influência dos agentes químicos de limpeza sobre reembasadores resilientes de próteses Prótese totalMateriais resilientesSiliconesDurezaDenturecompleteResilient denture linerSiliconesHardness PURPOSE: Difficulty in cleaning resilient denture liners remains a material disadvantage. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of denture cleansers on hardness of resilient liner materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three resilient liners, Luci Sof® (Dentsply), Molloplast-B® (Dentax), and Sofreliner® (Tokuyama), and two denture cleansers, Efferdent® (Warner-Lamber), and 0.5% alkaline hypochlorite preparation were used. Twenty specimens of each material were prepared, measuring 25X15X3mm. Two denture cleansing approaches were used: 1) alkaline hypochlorite, for 20 minutes; 2) alkaline peroxide, for 30 minutes. This procedure was repeated 8 times a day, during 90 days. The specimens were evaluated before and after 360 and 720 cycles, to simulate 1 and 2 years of clinical cleaning procedures, respectively. The Shore A hardness was evaluated in a durometer (Teclock GS-709A), with a penetrating load of 10N for 1 second. Any macroscopic changes, such as loss of color or alteration in surface texture were recorded by one observer. All numeric data were subject to ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Tukey's test (alpha= 0.05). RESULTS: All materials were significantly different, independently to time and treatment. Initially, Luci Sof® and Sofreliner® immersed in either hypochlorite or peroxide increased the hardness mean values significantly. These hardness mean values decreased significantly after 720 cycles. Molloplast-B® showed no significant difference after the treatments, in any time. CONCLUSIONS: Denture cleansers had no effect on hardness of the resilient denture liners evaluated after 2 years of in vivo simulated conditions of hygiene. Sofreliner® was the smoothest material before and after all treatments. PROPOSIÇÃO: A maior desvantagem dos materiais reembasadores resilientes é a dificuldade em mantê-los limpos. Esse trabalho avaliou o efeito de agentes de limpeza sobre a dureza de reembasadores resilientes. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Foram utilizados os materiais Luci Sof® (Dentsply), Molloplast-B® (Dentax) e Sofreliner® (Tokuyama), e os agentes de limpeza Hipoclorito de Sódio a 0,5% (Medicinallis-Farmácia de Manipulação) e Efferdent® (Warner-Lamber). Foram confeccionadas 20 amostras de cada material, com dimensões de 25X14X3mm. Foram realizados 2 tratamentos: 1) Hipoclorito de Sódio a 0,5% a 37 + 1ºC, durante 20 minutos; 2) Peróxido Alcalino, a 37 + 1ºC, durante 30 minutos. Após as imersões, as amostras foram lavadas e imersas em água destilada, a 37 ± 1ºC, pelo período restante das 24 h. Esse processo foi repetido 8 vezes por dia, durante 90 dias. A dureza foi avaliada antes e após 360 e 720 ciclos, correspondente a 1 e 2 anos de uso clínico, respectivamente. O ensaio de dureza Shore A foi realizado em durômetro modelo GS-709 (Teclock-Japão), com aplicação de carga de 10 N por 1 segundo. Alterações macroscópicas, como perda de cor e alteração da superfície, foram avaliadas por um observador. Os resultados obtidos foram submetidos à ANOVA com medidas repetidas e ao Teste de Tukey (5%). RESULTADOS: Os materiais apresentaram diferença significante nos valores médios de dureza, independente do tratamento e do tempo. Luci Sof® e Sofreliner® aumentaram os valores médios de dureza inicialmente, os quais diminuíram após 720 ciclos significativamente, para ambos os tratamentos. Molloplast-B® não apresentou diferença significante nos diferentes tempos e tratamentos. CONCLUSÕES: Os tratamentos em agentes de limpeza não alteraram os valores de dureza dos reembasadores resilientes após 2 anos de simulação clínica. Sofreliner® apresentou os menores valores de dureza, em todos os tempos e tratamentos, apresentando-se como o material mais macio. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2006-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/338710.1590/S1678-77572006000400014Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2006); 286-290 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 Núm. 4 (2006); 286-290 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 14 n. 4 (2006); 286-290 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3387/4077Copyright (c) 2006 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Luciana ValadaresMesquita, Marcelo FerrazHenriques, Guilherme Elias PessanhaConsani, Rafael Leonardo XediekFragoso, Wagner Sotero2012-04-27T11:54:41Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3387Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T11:54:41Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners
Influência dos agentes químicos de limpeza sobre reembasadores resilientes de próteses
title The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners
spellingShingle The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners
Oliveira, Luciana Valadares
Prótese total
Materiais resilientes
Silicones
Dureza
Denture
complete
Resilient denture liner
Silicones
Hardness
title_short The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners
title_full The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners
title_fullStr The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners
title_full_unstemmed The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners
title_sort The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners
author Oliveira, Luciana Valadares
author_facet Oliveira, Luciana Valadares
Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz
Henriques, Guilherme Elias Pessanha
Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek
Fragoso, Wagner Sotero
author_role author
author2 Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz
Henriques, Guilherme Elias Pessanha
Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek
Fragoso, Wagner Sotero
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Luciana Valadares
Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz
Henriques, Guilherme Elias Pessanha
Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek
Fragoso, Wagner Sotero
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Prótese total
Materiais resilientes
Silicones
Dureza
Denture
complete
Resilient denture liner
Silicones
Hardness
topic Prótese total
Materiais resilientes
Silicones
Dureza
Denture
complete
Resilient denture liner
Silicones
Hardness
description PURPOSE: Difficulty in cleaning resilient denture liners remains a material disadvantage. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of denture cleansers on hardness of resilient liner materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three resilient liners, Luci Sof® (Dentsply), Molloplast-B® (Dentax), and Sofreliner® (Tokuyama), and two denture cleansers, Efferdent® (Warner-Lamber), and 0.5% alkaline hypochlorite preparation were used. Twenty specimens of each material were prepared, measuring 25X15X3mm. Two denture cleansing approaches were used: 1) alkaline hypochlorite, for 20 minutes; 2) alkaline peroxide, for 30 minutes. This procedure was repeated 8 times a day, during 90 days. The specimens were evaluated before and after 360 and 720 cycles, to simulate 1 and 2 years of clinical cleaning procedures, respectively. The Shore A hardness was evaluated in a durometer (Teclock GS-709A), with a penetrating load of 10N for 1 second. Any macroscopic changes, such as loss of color or alteration in surface texture were recorded by one observer. All numeric data were subject to ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Tukey's test (alpha= 0.05). RESULTS: All materials were significantly different, independently to time and treatment. Initially, Luci Sof® and Sofreliner® immersed in either hypochlorite or peroxide increased the hardness mean values significantly. These hardness mean values decreased significantly after 720 cycles. Molloplast-B® showed no significant difference after the treatments, in any time. CONCLUSIONS: Denture cleansers had no effect on hardness of the resilient denture liners evaluated after 2 years of in vivo simulated conditions of hygiene. Sofreliner® was the smoothest material before and after all treatments.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3387
10.1590/S1678-77572006000400014
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3387
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572006000400014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3387/4077
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2006 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2006 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2006); 286-290
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 Núm. 4 (2006); 286-290
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 14 n. 4 (2006); 286-290
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221672788197376