Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Azevedo, Juliana Felipi David e Góes de, Francisconi, Ana Carolina, Almeida, Cristiane Machado de, Ishikiriama, Sérgio Kiyoshi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/46257
Resumo: This study evaluated color change, stability, and tooth sensitivity in patients submitted to different bleaching techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, 48 patients were divided into five groups. A half-mouth design was conducted to compare two in-office bleaching techniques (with and without light activation): G1: 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) (Lase Peroxide - DMC Equipments, São Carlos, SP, Brazil) + hybrid light (HL) (LED/Diode Laser, Whitening Lase II DMC Equipments, São Carlos, SP, Brazil); G2: 35% HP; G3: 38% HP (X-traBoost - Ultradent, South Jordan UT, USA) + HL; G4: 38% HP; and G5: 15% carbamide peroxide (CP) (Opalescence PF - Ultradent, South Jordan UT, USA). For G1 and G3, HP was applied on the enamel surface for 3 consecutive applications activated by HL. Each application included 3x3' HL activations with 1' between each interval; for G2 and G4, HP was applied 3x15' with 15' between intervals; and for G5, 15% CP was applied for 120'/10 days at home. A spectrophotometer was used to measure color change before the treatment and after 24 h, 1 week, 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. A VAS questionnaire was used to evaluate tooth sensitivity before the treatment, immediately following treatment, 24 h after and finally 1 week after. RESULTS: Statistical analysis did not reveal any significant differences between in-office bleaching with or without HL activation related to effectiveness; nevertheless the time required was less with HL. Statistical differences were observed between the results after 24 h, 1 week and 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months (intergroup). Immediately, in-office bleaching increased tooth sensitivity. The groups activated with HL required less application time with gel. CONCLUSION: All techniques and bleaching agents used were effective and demonstrated similar behaviors.
id USP-17_d6726484caf942ea0e19516ec0883c17
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/46257
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-upDental bleachingDentin sensitivityHydrogen peroxideThis study evaluated color change, stability, and tooth sensitivity in patients submitted to different bleaching techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, 48 patients were divided into five groups. A half-mouth design was conducted to compare two in-office bleaching techniques (with and without light activation): G1: 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) (Lase Peroxide - DMC Equipments, São Carlos, SP, Brazil) + hybrid light (HL) (LED/Diode Laser, Whitening Lase II DMC Equipments, São Carlos, SP, Brazil); G2: 35% HP; G3: 38% HP (X-traBoost - Ultradent, South Jordan UT, USA) + HL; G4: 38% HP; and G5: 15% carbamide peroxide (CP) (Opalescence PF - Ultradent, South Jordan UT, USA). For G1 and G3, HP was applied on the enamel surface for 3 consecutive applications activated by HL. Each application included 3x3' HL activations with 1' between each interval; for G2 and G4, HP was applied 3x15' with 15' between intervals; and for G5, 15% CP was applied for 120'/10 days at home. A spectrophotometer was used to measure color change before the treatment and after 24 h, 1 week, 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. A VAS questionnaire was used to evaluate tooth sensitivity before the treatment, immediately following treatment, 24 h after and finally 1 week after. RESULTS: Statistical analysis did not reveal any significant differences between in-office bleaching with or without HL activation related to effectiveness; nevertheless the time required was less with HL. Statistical differences were observed between the results after 24 h, 1 week and 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months (intergroup). Immediately, in-office bleaching increased tooth sensitivity. The groups activated with HL required less application time with gel. CONCLUSION: All techniques and bleaching agents used were effective and demonstrated similar behaviors.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2012-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/4625710.1590/S1678-77572012000400008Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 20 No. 4 (2012); 435-443Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 20 Núm. 4 (2012); 435-443Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 20 n. 4 (2012); 435-4431678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/46257/49879Copyright (c) 2012 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMondelli, Rafael Francisco LiaAzevedo, Juliana Felipi David e Góes deFrancisconi, Ana CarolinaAlmeida, Cristiane Machado deIshikiriama, Sérgio Kiyoshi2012-10-18T19:45:54Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/46257Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-10-18T19:45:54Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up
title Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up
spellingShingle Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up
Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
Dental bleaching
Dentin sensitivity
Hydrogen peroxide
title_short Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up
title_full Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up
title_fullStr Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up
title_sort Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up
author Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
author_facet Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
Azevedo, Juliana Felipi David e Góes de
Francisconi, Ana Carolina
Almeida, Cristiane Machado de
Ishikiriama, Sérgio Kiyoshi
author_role author
author2 Azevedo, Juliana Felipi David e Góes de
Francisconi, Ana Carolina
Almeida, Cristiane Machado de
Ishikiriama, Sérgio Kiyoshi
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
Azevedo, Juliana Felipi David e Góes de
Francisconi, Ana Carolina
Almeida, Cristiane Machado de
Ishikiriama, Sérgio Kiyoshi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental bleaching
Dentin sensitivity
Hydrogen peroxide
topic Dental bleaching
Dentin sensitivity
Hydrogen peroxide
description This study evaluated color change, stability, and tooth sensitivity in patients submitted to different bleaching techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, 48 patients were divided into five groups. A half-mouth design was conducted to compare two in-office bleaching techniques (with and without light activation): G1: 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) (Lase Peroxide - DMC Equipments, São Carlos, SP, Brazil) + hybrid light (HL) (LED/Diode Laser, Whitening Lase II DMC Equipments, São Carlos, SP, Brazil); G2: 35% HP; G3: 38% HP (X-traBoost - Ultradent, South Jordan UT, USA) + HL; G4: 38% HP; and G5: 15% carbamide peroxide (CP) (Opalescence PF - Ultradent, South Jordan UT, USA). For G1 and G3, HP was applied on the enamel surface for 3 consecutive applications activated by HL. Each application included 3x3' HL activations with 1' between each interval; for G2 and G4, HP was applied 3x15' with 15' between intervals; and for G5, 15% CP was applied for 120'/10 days at home. A spectrophotometer was used to measure color change before the treatment and after 24 h, 1 week, 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. A VAS questionnaire was used to evaluate tooth sensitivity before the treatment, immediately following treatment, 24 h after and finally 1 week after. RESULTS: Statistical analysis did not reveal any significant differences between in-office bleaching with or without HL activation related to effectiveness; nevertheless the time required was less with HL. Statistical differences were observed between the results after 24 h, 1 week and 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months (intergroup). Immediately, in-office bleaching increased tooth sensitivity. The groups activated with HL required less application time with gel. CONCLUSION: All techniques and bleaching agents used were effective and demonstrated similar behaviors.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/46257
10.1590/S1678-77572012000400008
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/46257
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572012000400008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/46257/49879
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 20 No. 4 (2012); 435-443
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 20 Núm. 4 (2012); 435-443
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 20 n. 4 (2012); 435-443
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1787713193202679808