Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MONTEIRO,Maria Regina Guerra
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: SILVA,Licinio Esmeraldo da, ELIAS,Carlos Nelson, VILELLA,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572014000300228
Resumo: Objective: To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance. Material and Methods: Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets - Gemini, 3M/Unitek) with three (0, 5, and 10 degrees) slot angulation attached with elastomeric ligatures (TP Orthodontics) were tested. All brackets were tested with archwire 0.019"x0.025" nickel-titanium, beta-titanium, and stainless steel (Unitek/3M). The mechanical testing was performed with a universal testing machine eMIC DL 10000 (eMIC Co, Brazil). The wires were pulled from the bracket slots at a cross-head speed of 3 mm/min until 2 mm displacement. Results: Self-ligating brackets produced significantly lower friction values compared with those of conventional brackets. Frictional force resistance values were directly proportional to the increase in the bracket/ wire angulation. With regard to conventional brackets, stainless steel wires had the lowest friction force values, followed by nickel-titanium and beta-titanium ones. With regard to self-ligating brackets, the nickel-titanium wires had the lowest friction values, significantly lower than those of other materials. Conclusion: even at different angulations, the self-ligating brackets showed significantly lower friction force values than the conventional brackets. Combined with nickel-titanium wires, the self-ligating brackets exhibit much lower friction, possibly due to the contact between nickel-titanium clips and wires of the same material.
id USP-17_d84ee507459759d89b556f2893b8ac2f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-77572014000300228
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinationsFrictionOrthodontic bracketsOrthodontic wiresBiomaterials Objective: To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance. Material and Methods: Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets - Gemini, 3M/Unitek) with three (0, 5, and 10 degrees) slot angulation attached with elastomeric ligatures (TP Orthodontics) were tested. All brackets were tested with archwire 0.019"x0.025" nickel-titanium, beta-titanium, and stainless steel (Unitek/3M). The mechanical testing was performed with a universal testing machine eMIC DL 10000 (eMIC Co, Brazil). The wires were pulled from the bracket slots at a cross-head speed of 3 mm/min until 2 mm displacement. Results: Self-ligating brackets produced significantly lower friction values compared with those of conventional brackets. Frictional force resistance values were directly proportional to the increase in the bracket/ wire angulation. With regard to conventional brackets, stainless steel wires had the lowest friction force values, followed by nickel-titanium and beta-titanium ones. With regard to self-ligating brackets, the nickel-titanium wires had the lowest friction values, significantly lower than those of other materials. Conclusion: even at different angulations, the self-ligating brackets showed significantly lower friction force values than the conventional brackets. Combined with nickel-titanium wires, the self-ligating brackets exhibit much lower friction, possibly due to the contact between nickel-titanium clips and wires of the same material. Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572014000300228Journal of Applied Oral Science v.22 n.3 2014reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/1678-775720130665info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMONTEIRO,Maria Regina GuerraSILVA,Licinio Esmeraldo daELIAS,Carlos NelsonVILELLA,Oswaldo de Vasconcelloseng2014-06-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572014000300228Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2014-06-13T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
spellingShingle Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
MONTEIRO,Maria Regina Guerra
Friction
Orthodontic brackets
Orthodontic wires
Biomaterials
title_short Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_full Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_fullStr Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_full_unstemmed Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_sort Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
author MONTEIRO,Maria Regina Guerra
author_facet MONTEIRO,Maria Regina Guerra
SILVA,Licinio Esmeraldo da
ELIAS,Carlos Nelson
VILELLA,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
author_role author
author2 SILVA,Licinio Esmeraldo da
ELIAS,Carlos Nelson
VILELLA,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MONTEIRO,Maria Regina Guerra
SILVA,Licinio Esmeraldo da
ELIAS,Carlos Nelson
VILELLA,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Friction
Orthodontic brackets
Orthodontic wires
Biomaterials
topic Friction
Orthodontic brackets
Orthodontic wires
Biomaterials
description Objective: To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance. Material and Methods: Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets - Gemini, 3M/Unitek) with three (0, 5, and 10 degrees) slot angulation attached with elastomeric ligatures (TP Orthodontics) were tested. All brackets were tested with archwire 0.019"x0.025" nickel-titanium, beta-titanium, and stainless steel (Unitek/3M). The mechanical testing was performed with a universal testing machine eMIC DL 10000 (eMIC Co, Brazil). The wires were pulled from the bracket slots at a cross-head speed of 3 mm/min until 2 mm displacement. Results: Self-ligating brackets produced significantly lower friction values compared with those of conventional brackets. Frictional force resistance values were directly proportional to the increase in the bracket/ wire angulation. With regard to conventional brackets, stainless steel wires had the lowest friction force values, followed by nickel-titanium and beta-titanium ones. With regard to self-ligating brackets, the nickel-titanium wires had the lowest friction values, significantly lower than those of other materials. Conclusion: even at different angulations, the self-ligating brackets showed significantly lower friction force values than the conventional brackets. Combined with nickel-titanium wires, the self-ligating brackets exhibit much lower friction, possibly due to the contact between nickel-titanium clips and wires of the same material.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572014000300228
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572014000300228
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-775720130665
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science v.22 n.3 2014
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1748936438103146496