Non-conventional P sources for zebu cows in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1995 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/20260 |
Resumo: | To evaluate non-conventional phosphorus sources, a group of 400 Nellore cows mantained under pasture received a mineral mixture with different P sources (group I: superphosphate - 500 ppm P; group II: superphosphate - 340 ppm P plus rock phosphate Patos 160 ppm P; group III: superphosphate 340 ppm P plus dicalcium phosphate 160 ppm P; group IV - dicalcium phosphate 500 ppm P). There were no differences in pregnancy rate, calving rate and calving interval. A fluorine deposition in bone was observed for the treatments with superphosphate and rock phosphate (66.92 ± 15.53; 69.97 ± 6.5 and 64.05 ± 3.35% respectively for group I, II and III). Superphosphate was almost as good dicalcium phosphate to provide phosphorus for grazing cows and there was a potentially significant economic advantage over dicalcium phosphate. |
id |
USP-18_0b91a6b21892f2e3585a4fa4cdc95fc3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/20260 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-18 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Non-conventional P sources for zebu cows in Brazil Fontes não convencionais de fósforo para gado zebu no Brasil fósforofosfatosflúorbovinosphosphoruscattlerock phosphatefluorine To evaluate non-conventional phosphorus sources, a group of 400 Nellore cows mantained under pasture received a mineral mixture with different P sources (group I: superphosphate - 500 ppm P; group II: superphosphate - 340 ppm P plus rock phosphate Patos 160 ppm P; group III: superphosphate 340 ppm P plus dicalcium phosphate 160 ppm P; group IV - dicalcium phosphate 500 ppm P). There were no differences in pregnancy rate, calving rate and calving interval. A fluorine deposition in bone was observed for the treatments with superphosphate and rock phosphate (66.92 ± 15.53; 69.97 ± 6.5 and 64.05 ± 3.35% respectively for group I, II and III). Superphosphate was almost as good dicalcium phosphate to provide phosphorus for grazing cows and there was a potentially significant economic advantage over dicalcium phosphate. Quatrocentas vacas Nelore, mantidas em pastagem, receberam mistura mineral contendo fontes não convencionais de fósforo (grupo I - 500 ppm P-superfosfato triplo; grupo II - 340 ppm P como superfosfato e 160 ppm P como rocha Patos; grupo III - 340 ppm P como superfosfato e 160 ppm P como fosfato bicálcico; grupo IV -500 ppm P como fosfato bicálcico). Não se verificou diferenças na taxa de prenhez, porcentagem de nascimento e intervalo entre partos. Observou-se que houve maior concentração de flúor nos ossos para o tratamento com fosfato de rocha. O superfosfato triplo apresentou-se como fonte adequada de P e mostrou vantagem econômica em relação ao bicálcico. Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz1995-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/2026010.1590/S0103-90161995000100014Scientia Agricola; v. 52 n. 1 (1995); 78-81Scientia Agricola; Vol. 52 No. 1 (1995); 78-81Scientia Agricola; Vol. 52 Núm. 1 (1995); 78-811678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/20260/22377Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVitti, D.M.S.S.Abdalla, A.L.Lopes, H.O.S.Pereira, E.A.Meirelles, C.F.2015-07-07T11:26:33Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/20260Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2015-07-07T11:26:33Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Non-conventional P sources for zebu cows in Brazil Fontes não convencionais de fósforo para gado zebu no Brasil |
title |
Non-conventional P sources for zebu cows in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Non-conventional P sources for zebu cows in Brazil Vitti, D.M.S.S. fósforo fosfatos flúor bovinos phosphorus cattle rock phosphate fluorine |
title_short |
Non-conventional P sources for zebu cows in Brazil |
title_full |
Non-conventional P sources for zebu cows in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Non-conventional P sources for zebu cows in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-conventional P sources for zebu cows in Brazil |
title_sort |
Non-conventional P sources for zebu cows in Brazil |
author |
Vitti, D.M.S.S. |
author_facet |
Vitti, D.M.S.S. Abdalla, A.L. Lopes, H.O.S. Pereira, E.A. Meirelles, C.F. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Abdalla, A.L. Lopes, H.O.S. Pereira, E.A. Meirelles, C.F. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vitti, D.M.S.S. Abdalla, A.L. Lopes, H.O.S. Pereira, E.A. Meirelles, C.F. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
fósforo fosfatos flúor bovinos phosphorus cattle rock phosphate fluorine |
topic |
fósforo fosfatos flúor bovinos phosphorus cattle rock phosphate fluorine |
description |
To evaluate non-conventional phosphorus sources, a group of 400 Nellore cows mantained under pasture received a mineral mixture with different P sources (group I: superphosphate - 500 ppm P; group II: superphosphate - 340 ppm P plus rock phosphate Patos 160 ppm P; group III: superphosphate 340 ppm P plus dicalcium phosphate 160 ppm P; group IV - dicalcium phosphate 500 ppm P). There were no differences in pregnancy rate, calving rate and calving interval. A fluorine deposition in bone was observed for the treatments with superphosphate and rock phosphate (66.92 ± 15.53; 69.97 ± 6.5 and 64.05 ± 3.35% respectively for group I, II and III). Superphosphate was almost as good dicalcium phosphate to provide phosphorus for grazing cows and there was a potentially significant economic advantage over dicalcium phosphate. |
publishDate |
1995 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1995-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/20260 10.1590/S0103-90161995000100014 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/20260 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-90161995000100014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/20260/22377 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricola info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricola |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agricola; v. 52 n. 1 (1995); 78-81 Scientia Agricola; Vol. 52 No. 1 (1995); 78-81 Scientia Agricola; Vol. 52 Núm. 1 (1995); 78-81 1678-992X 0103-9016 reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br |
_version_ |
1787713251974316032 |