Energy embodiment in Brazilian agriculture: an overview of 23 crops

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Veiga, João Paulo Soto
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Romanelli, Thiago Libório, Gimenez, Leandro Maria, Busato, Patrizia, Milan, Marcos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/106673
Resumo: The amount of energy required to produce a commodity or to supply a service varies from one production system to another and consequently giving rise to differing levels of environmental efficiency. Moreover, since energy prices have been continuously increasing over time, this energy amount may be a factor that has economic worth. Biomass production has a variety of end-products such as food, energy, and fiber; thus, taking into account the similarity in end-product of different crops (e.g.: sunflower, peanuts, or soybean for oil) it is possible to evaluate which crops require less energy per functional unit, such as starch, oil, and protein. This information can be used in decision-making about policies for food safety or bioenergy. In this study, 23 crops were evaluated allowing for a comparison in terms of energy embodied per functional unit. Crops were grouped as follows: starch, oil, horticultural, perennial and fiber, to provide for a deeper analysis of alternatives for the groups, and subsidize further studies comparing conventional and alternative production systems such as organic or genetically modified organisms, in terms of energy. The best energy balance observed was whole sugarcane (juice, bagasse and straw) with a surplus of 268 GJ ha−1 yr−1; palm shows the highest energy return on investment with a ratio of approximately 30:1. For carbohydrates and protein production, cassava and soybean, respectively, emerged as the crops offering the greatest energy savings in the production of these functional foods.
id USP-18_828c737d1b34a416b4d58a314468a28e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/106673
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Energy embodiment in Brazilian agriculture: an overview of 23 crops The amount of energy required to produce a commodity or to supply a service varies from one production system to another and consequently giving rise to differing levels of environmental efficiency. Moreover, since energy prices have been continuously increasing over time, this energy amount may be a factor that has economic worth. Biomass production has a variety of end-products such as food, energy, and fiber; thus, taking into account the similarity in end-product of different crops (e.g.: sunflower, peanuts, or soybean for oil) it is possible to evaluate which crops require less energy per functional unit, such as starch, oil, and protein. This information can be used in decision-making about policies for food safety or bioenergy. In this study, 23 crops were evaluated allowing for a comparison in terms of energy embodied per functional unit. Crops were grouped as follows: starch, oil, horticultural, perennial and fiber, to provide for a deeper analysis of alternatives for the groups, and subsidize further studies comparing conventional and alternative production systems such as organic or genetically modified organisms, in terms of energy. The best energy balance observed was whole sugarcane (juice, bagasse and straw) with a surplus of 268 GJ ha−1 yr−1; palm shows the highest energy return on investment with a ratio of approximately 30:1. For carbohydrates and protein production, cassava and soybean, respectively, emerged as the crops offering the greatest energy savings in the production of these functional foods. Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/10667310.1590/0103-9016-2015-0188Scientia Agricola; v. 72 n. 6 (2015); 471-477Scientia Agricola; Vol. 72 Núm. 6 (2015); 471-477Scientia Agricola; Vol. 72 No. 6 (2015); 471-4771678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/106673/105288Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVeiga, João Paulo SotoRomanelli, Thiago LibórioGimenez, Leandro MariaBusato, PatriziaMilan, Marcos2015-10-27T16:19:02Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/106673Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2015-10-27T16:19:02Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Energy embodiment in Brazilian agriculture: an overview of 23 crops
title Energy embodiment in Brazilian agriculture: an overview of 23 crops
spellingShingle Energy embodiment in Brazilian agriculture: an overview of 23 crops
Veiga, João Paulo Soto
title_short Energy embodiment in Brazilian agriculture: an overview of 23 crops
title_full Energy embodiment in Brazilian agriculture: an overview of 23 crops
title_fullStr Energy embodiment in Brazilian agriculture: an overview of 23 crops
title_full_unstemmed Energy embodiment in Brazilian agriculture: an overview of 23 crops
title_sort Energy embodiment in Brazilian agriculture: an overview of 23 crops
author Veiga, João Paulo Soto
author_facet Veiga, João Paulo Soto
Romanelli, Thiago Libório
Gimenez, Leandro Maria
Busato, Patrizia
Milan, Marcos
author_role author
author2 Romanelli, Thiago Libório
Gimenez, Leandro Maria
Busato, Patrizia
Milan, Marcos
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Veiga, João Paulo Soto
Romanelli, Thiago Libório
Gimenez, Leandro Maria
Busato, Patrizia
Milan, Marcos
description The amount of energy required to produce a commodity or to supply a service varies from one production system to another and consequently giving rise to differing levels of environmental efficiency. Moreover, since energy prices have been continuously increasing over time, this energy amount may be a factor that has economic worth. Biomass production has a variety of end-products such as food, energy, and fiber; thus, taking into account the similarity in end-product of different crops (e.g.: sunflower, peanuts, or soybean for oil) it is possible to evaluate which crops require less energy per functional unit, such as starch, oil, and protein. This information can be used in decision-making about policies for food safety or bioenergy. In this study, 23 crops were evaluated allowing for a comparison in terms of energy embodied per functional unit. Crops were grouped as follows: starch, oil, horticultural, perennial and fiber, to provide for a deeper analysis of alternatives for the groups, and subsidize further studies comparing conventional and alternative production systems such as organic or genetically modified organisms, in terms of energy. The best energy balance observed was whole sugarcane (juice, bagasse and straw) with a surplus of 268 GJ ha−1 yr−1; palm shows the highest energy return on investment with a ratio of approximately 30:1. For carbohydrates and protein production, cassava and soybean, respectively, emerged as the crops offering the greatest energy savings in the production of these functional foods.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/106673
10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0188
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/106673
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0188
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/106673/105288
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 72 n. 6 (2015); 471-477
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 72 Núm. 6 (2015); 471-477
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 72 No. 6 (2015); 471-477
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222792500641792