Carbon indices to assess quality of management systems in a Subtropical Acrisol

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zanatta, Josiléia Acordi
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Vieira, Frederico Costa Beber, Briedis, Clever, Dieckow, Jeferson, Bayer, Cimélio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/160642
Resumo: Management systems to improve soil quality are essential for agricultural and environmental sustainability. We assessed the quality of soil management systems applied to a subtropical Acrisol in terms of the carbon management index (CMI), the stratification ratio for total organic carbon (SR-TOC) and light fraction of organic matter (SR-LF). In addition, we examined their relationship to chemical, physical and biological soil quality indicators, as well as to maize yield. The study was conducted on a long-term experiment (18 years) in southern Brazil involving two different systems [no tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT)], two cropping systems [black oat/maize (O/M) and black oat + vetch/maize + cowpea (OV/MC)] and two nitrogen fertilizer rates for maize (0 and 180 kg ha–1). Based on the three indices, the best managements for soil quality comprised NT (50-212 % better than CT), legume cover crops (10-47 % better than O/M) and N fertilization (8-33 % better than no fertilizer). All three indices proved accurate to assess the impact of soil management systems, especially SR-LF, which showed increased sensitivity and close relationships with chemical, physical and biological soil quality indicators. On the other hand, a poor relationship was observed between soil C indices and maize yield, which was improved only by legume cover crops and N fertilization. The results showed that the association of no-till system to an abundant supply of crop residues is key to ensure high soil quality and crop yields in humid subtropical regions.
id USP-18_9057612cab9fedb121576e41bffa5093
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/160642
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Carbon indices to assess quality of management systems in a Subtropical Acrisolconservation agriculturecropping systemsno-tillquality indicatorsManagement systems to improve soil quality are essential for agricultural and environmental sustainability. We assessed the quality of soil management systems applied to a subtropical Acrisol in terms of the carbon management index (CMI), the stratification ratio for total organic carbon (SR-TOC) and light fraction of organic matter (SR-LF). In addition, we examined their relationship to chemical, physical and biological soil quality indicators, as well as to maize yield. The study was conducted on a long-term experiment (18 years) in southern Brazil involving two different systems [no tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT)], two cropping systems [black oat/maize (O/M) and black oat + vetch/maize + cowpea (OV/MC)] and two nitrogen fertilizer rates for maize (0 and 180 kg ha–1). Based on the three indices, the best managements for soil quality comprised NT (50-212 % better than CT), legume cover crops (10-47 % better than O/M) and N fertilization (8-33 % better than no fertilizer). All three indices proved accurate to assess the impact of soil management systems, especially SR-LF, which showed increased sensitivity and close relationships with chemical, physical and biological soil quality indicators. On the other hand, a poor relationship was observed between soil C indices and maize yield, which was improved only by legume cover crops and N fertilization. The results showed that the association of no-till system to an abundant supply of crop residues is key to ensure high soil quality and crop yields in humid subtropical regions.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2019-08-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/16064210.1590/1678-992x-2017-0322Scientia Agricola; v. 76 n. 6 (2019); 501-508Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 Núm. 6 (2019); 501-508Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 No. 6 (2019); 501-5081678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/160642/154893Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZanatta, Josiléia AcordiVieira, Frederico Costa BeberBriedis, CleverDieckow, JefersonBayer, Cimélio2019-08-02T17:12:54Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/160642Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2019-08-02T17:12:54Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Carbon indices to assess quality of management systems in a Subtropical Acrisol
title Carbon indices to assess quality of management systems in a Subtropical Acrisol
spellingShingle Carbon indices to assess quality of management systems in a Subtropical Acrisol
Zanatta, Josiléia Acordi
conservation agriculture
cropping systems
no-till
quality indicators
title_short Carbon indices to assess quality of management systems in a Subtropical Acrisol
title_full Carbon indices to assess quality of management systems in a Subtropical Acrisol
title_fullStr Carbon indices to assess quality of management systems in a Subtropical Acrisol
title_full_unstemmed Carbon indices to assess quality of management systems in a Subtropical Acrisol
title_sort Carbon indices to assess quality of management systems in a Subtropical Acrisol
author Zanatta, Josiléia Acordi
author_facet Zanatta, Josiléia Acordi
Vieira, Frederico Costa Beber
Briedis, Clever
Dieckow, Jeferson
Bayer, Cimélio
author_role author
author2 Vieira, Frederico Costa Beber
Briedis, Clever
Dieckow, Jeferson
Bayer, Cimélio
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zanatta, Josiléia Acordi
Vieira, Frederico Costa Beber
Briedis, Clever
Dieckow, Jeferson
Bayer, Cimélio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv conservation agriculture
cropping systems
no-till
quality indicators
topic conservation agriculture
cropping systems
no-till
quality indicators
description Management systems to improve soil quality are essential for agricultural and environmental sustainability. We assessed the quality of soil management systems applied to a subtropical Acrisol in terms of the carbon management index (CMI), the stratification ratio for total organic carbon (SR-TOC) and light fraction of organic matter (SR-LF). In addition, we examined their relationship to chemical, physical and biological soil quality indicators, as well as to maize yield. The study was conducted on a long-term experiment (18 years) in southern Brazil involving two different systems [no tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT)], two cropping systems [black oat/maize (O/M) and black oat + vetch/maize + cowpea (OV/MC)] and two nitrogen fertilizer rates for maize (0 and 180 kg ha–1). Based on the three indices, the best managements for soil quality comprised NT (50-212 % better than CT), legume cover crops (10-47 % better than O/M) and N fertilization (8-33 % better than no fertilizer). All three indices proved accurate to assess the impact of soil management systems, especially SR-LF, which showed increased sensitivity and close relationships with chemical, physical and biological soil quality indicators. On the other hand, a poor relationship was observed between soil C indices and maize yield, which was improved only by legume cover crops and N fertilization. The results showed that the association of no-till system to an abundant supply of crop residues is key to ensure high soil quality and crop yields in humid subtropical regions.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/160642
10.1590/1678-992x-2017-0322
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/160642
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992x-2017-0322
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/160642/154893
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 76 n. 6 (2019); 501-508
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 Núm. 6 (2019); 501-508
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 No. 6 (2019); 501-508
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222794012688384