Cover crop rotations in no-till system: short-term CO2 emissions and soybean yield

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rigon, João Paulo Gonsiorkiewicz
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Calonego, Juliano Carlos, Rosolem, Ciro Antonio, Scala Jr., Newton La
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/140040
Resumo: In addition to improving sustainability in cropping systems, the use of a spring and winter crop rotation system may be a viable option for mitigating soil CO2 emissions (ECO2). This study aimed to determine short-term ECO2 as affected by crop rotations and soil management over one soybean cycle in two no-till experiments, and to assess the soybean yields with the lowest ECO2. Two experiments were carried out in fall-winter as follows: i) triticale and sunflower were grown in Typic Rhodudalf (TR), and ii) ruzigrass, grain sorghum, and ruzigrass + grain sorghum were grown in Rhodic Hapludox (RH). In the spring, pearl millet, sunn hemp, and forage sorghum were grown in both experiments. In addition, in TR a fallow treatment was also applied in the spring. Soybean was grown every year in the summer, and ECO2 were recorded during the growing period. The average ECO2 was 0.58 and 0.84 g m2 h–1 with accumulated ECO2 of 5,268 and 7,813 kg ha–1 C-CO2 in TR and RH, respectively. Sunn hemp, when compared to pearl millet, resulted in lower ECO2 by up to 12 % and an increase in soybean yield of 9% in TR. In RH, under the winter crop Ruzigrazz+Sorghum, ECO2 were lower by 17%, although with the same soybean yield. Soil moisture and N content of crop residues are the main drivers of ECO2 and soil clay content seems to play an important role in ECO2 that is worthy of further studies. In conclusion, sunn hemp in crop rotation may be utilized to mitigate ECO2 and improve soybean yield.
id USP-18_b7a712ac9e34eee11fb0fe41b1e9ee55
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/140040
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Cover crop rotations in no-till system: short-term CO2 emissions and soybean yieldGlycine max (L.) Merrillcarbon equivalentcrop residuemanagement system In addition to improving sustainability in cropping systems, the use of a spring and winter crop rotation system may be a viable option for mitigating soil CO2 emissions (ECO2). This study aimed to determine short-term ECO2 as affected by crop rotations and soil management over one soybean cycle in two no-till experiments, and to assess the soybean yields with the lowest ECO2. Two experiments were carried out in fall-winter as follows: i) triticale and sunflower were grown in Typic Rhodudalf (TR), and ii) ruzigrass, grain sorghum, and ruzigrass + grain sorghum were grown in Rhodic Hapludox (RH). In the spring, pearl millet, sunn hemp, and forage sorghum were grown in both experiments. In addition, in TR a fallow treatment was also applied in the spring. Soybean was grown every year in the summer, and ECO2 were recorded during the growing period. The average ECO2 was 0.58 and 0.84 g m2 h–1 with accumulated ECO2 of 5,268 and 7,813 kg ha–1 C-CO2 in TR and RH, respectively. Sunn hemp, when compared to pearl millet, resulted in lower ECO2 by up to 12 % and an increase in soybean yield of 9% in TR. In RH, under the winter crop Ruzigrazz+Sorghum, ECO2 were lower by 17%, although with the same soybean yield. Soil moisture and N content of crop residues are the main drivers of ECO2 and soil clay content seems to play an important role in ECO2 that is worthy of further studies. In conclusion, sunn hemp in crop rotation may be utilized to mitigate ECO2 and improve soybean yield.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/14004010.1590/1678-992x-2016-0286Scientia Agricola; v. 75 n. 1 (2018); 18-26Scientia Agricola; Vol. 75 Núm. 1 (2018); 18-26Scientia Agricola; Vol. 75 No. 1 (2018); 18-261678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/140040/135240Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRigon, João Paulo GonsiorkiewiczCalonego, Juliano CarlosRosolem, Ciro AntonioScala Jr., Newton La2017-10-25T12:15:18Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/140040Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2017-10-25T12:15:18Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cover crop rotations in no-till system: short-term CO2 emissions and soybean yield
title Cover crop rotations in no-till system: short-term CO2 emissions and soybean yield
spellingShingle Cover crop rotations in no-till system: short-term CO2 emissions and soybean yield
Rigon, João Paulo Gonsiorkiewicz
Glycine max (L.) Merrill
carbon equivalent
crop residue
management system
title_short Cover crop rotations in no-till system: short-term CO2 emissions and soybean yield
title_full Cover crop rotations in no-till system: short-term CO2 emissions and soybean yield
title_fullStr Cover crop rotations in no-till system: short-term CO2 emissions and soybean yield
title_full_unstemmed Cover crop rotations in no-till system: short-term CO2 emissions and soybean yield
title_sort Cover crop rotations in no-till system: short-term CO2 emissions and soybean yield
author Rigon, João Paulo Gonsiorkiewicz
author_facet Rigon, João Paulo Gonsiorkiewicz
Calonego, Juliano Carlos
Rosolem, Ciro Antonio
Scala Jr., Newton La
author_role author
author2 Calonego, Juliano Carlos
Rosolem, Ciro Antonio
Scala Jr., Newton La
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rigon, João Paulo Gonsiorkiewicz
Calonego, Juliano Carlos
Rosolem, Ciro Antonio
Scala Jr., Newton La
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glycine max (L.) Merrill
carbon equivalent
crop residue
management system
topic Glycine max (L.) Merrill
carbon equivalent
crop residue
management system
description In addition to improving sustainability in cropping systems, the use of a spring and winter crop rotation system may be a viable option for mitigating soil CO2 emissions (ECO2). This study aimed to determine short-term ECO2 as affected by crop rotations and soil management over one soybean cycle in two no-till experiments, and to assess the soybean yields with the lowest ECO2. Two experiments were carried out in fall-winter as follows: i) triticale and sunflower were grown in Typic Rhodudalf (TR), and ii) ruzigrass, grain sorghum, and ruzigrass + grain sorghum were grown in Rhodic Hapludox (RH). In the spring, pearl millet, sunn hemp, and forage sorghum were grown in both experiments. In addition, in TR a fallow treatment was also applied in the spring. Soybean was grown every year in the summer, and ECO2 were recorded during the growing period. The average ECO2 was 0.58 and 0.84 g m2 h–1 with accumulated ECO2 of 5,268 and 7,813 kg ha–1 C-CO2 in TR and RH, respectively. Sunn hemp, when compared to pearl millet, resulted in lower ECO2 by up to 12 % and an increase in soybean yield of 9% in TR. In RH, under the winter crop Ruzigrazz+Sorghum, ECO2 were lower by 17%, although with the same soybean yield. Soil moisture and N content of crop residues are the main drivers of ECO2 and soil clay content seems to play an important role in ECO2 that is worthy of further studies. In conclusion, sunn hemp in crop rotation may be utilized to mitigate ECO2 and improve soybean yield.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/140040
10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0286
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/140040
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0286
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/140040/135240
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 75 n. 1 (2018); 18-26
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 75 Núm. 1 (2018); 18-26
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 75 No. 1 (2018); 18-26
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222793309093888