Defoliation intensity and leaf area index recovery in defoliated swards: implications for forage accumulation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Clóvis David Medeiros
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Schmitt, Daniel, Duchini , Paulo Gonçalves, Miqueloto, Tiago, Sbrissia, André Fischer
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183238
Resumo: This study evaluated the leaf area index (LAI) recovery mechanisms and forage accumulation rates on the regrowth of different grass species subjected to different defoliation intensities. For that purpose, plots of Pennisetum clandestinum (kikuyugrass), Lolium multiflorum (annual ryegrass), and Avena strigosa (black oats) were defoliated from 20 to 80 % of their initial heights (25, 20, and 25 cm, respectively). At different increments in height, forage samples were collected to ground level and used to estimate tiller population density (TPD), leaf area per tiller (LA ), and forage mass. From these data, we calculated the leaf area index (LAI), average leaf area index (aLAI), and average and instantaneous forage accumulation rate (FAR and IFAR, respectively). Data were plotted over time (days) to describe LAI recovery and forage accumulation rates. As the defoliation intensity increased, greater canopy heights were needed for pastures to achieve their maximum forage accumulation rates, which required longer regrowth intervals. The need for high tiller recruitment after defoliation, which delayed canopy LAI recovery, seemed to be one of the main cause. Thus, grazing management strategies that involve costly tiller recruitment could decrease both overall forage production and sward persistence over time. However, the plant ability to recover LAI after successive intense defoliations seems to be species-dependent and related to their phenotypic plasticity.
id USP-18_e891067907db2f516950172641177601
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/183238
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Defoliation intensity and leaf area index recovery in defoliated swards: implications for forage accumulationgrazing heightsgrazing managementintermittent stockingsward targetsThis study evaluated the leaf area index (LAI) recovery mechanisms and forage accumulation rates on the regrowth of different grass species subjected to different defoliation intensities. For that purpose, plots of Pennisetum clandestinum (kikuyugrass), Lolium multiflorum (annual ryegrass), and Avena strigosa (black oats) were defoliated from 20 to 80 % of their initial heights (25, 20, and 25 cm, respectively). At different increments in height, forage samples were collected to ground level and used to estimate tiller population density (TPD), leaf area per tiller (LA ), and forage mass. From these data, we calculated the leaf area index (LAI), average leaf area index (aLAI), and average and instantaneous forage accumulation rate (FAR and IFAR, respectively). Data were plotted over time (days) to describe LAI recovery and forage accumulation rates. As the defoliation intensity increased, greater canopy heights were needed for pastures to achieve their maximum forage accumulation rates, which required longer regrowth intervals. The need for high tiller recruitment after defoliation, which delayed canopy LAI recovery, seemed to be one of the main cause. Thus, grazing management strategies that involve costly tiller recruitment could decrease both overall forage production and sward persistence over time. However, the plant ability to recover LAI after successive intense defoliations seems to be species-dependent and related to their phenotypic plasticity.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2021-01-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/18323810.1590/1678-992X-2019-0095Scientia Agricola; v. 78 n. 2 (2021); e20190095Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 No. 2 (2021); e20190095Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 Núm. 2 (2021); e201900951678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183238/169918Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricolahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins, Clóvis David Medeiros Schmitt, Daniel Duchini , Paulo Gonçalves Miqueloto, Tiago Sbrissia, André Fischer 2021-03-18T18:32:16Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/183238Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2021-03-18T18:32:16Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Defoliation intensity and leaf area index recovery in defoliated swards: implications for forage accumulation
title Defoliation intensity and leaf area index recovery in defoliated swards: implications for forage accumulation
spellingShingle Defoliation intensity and leaf area index recovery in defoliated swards: implications for forage accumulation
Martins, Clóvis David Medeiros
grazing heights
grazing management
intermittent stocking
sward targets
title_short Defoliation intensity and leaf area index recovery in defoliated swards: implications for forage accumulation
title_full Defoliation intensity and leaf area index recovery in defoliated swards: implications for forage accumulation
title_fullStr Defoliation intensity and leaf area index recovery in defoliated swards: implications for forage accumulation
title_full_unstemmed Defoliation intensity and leaf area index recovery in defoliated swards: implications for forage accumulation
title_sort Defoliation intensity and leaf area index recovery in defoliated swards: implications for forage accumulation
author Martins, Clóvis David Medeiros
author_facet Martins, Clóvis David Medeiros
Schmitt, Daniel
Duchini , Paulo Gonçalves
Miqueloto, Tiago
Sbrissia, André Fischer
author_role author
author2 Schmitt, Daniel
Duchini , Paulo Gonçalves
Miqueloto, Tiago
Sbrissia, André Fischer
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Clóvis David Medeiros
Schmitt, Daniel
Duchini , Paulo Gonçalves
Miqueloto, Tiago
Sbrissia, André Fischer
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv grazing heights
grazing management
intermittent stocking
sward targets
topic grazing heights
grazing management
intermittent stocking
sward targets
description This study evaluated the leaf area index (LAI) recovery mechanisms and forage accumulation rates on the regrowth of different grass species subjected to different defoliation intensities. For that purpose, plots of Pennisetum clandestinum (kikuyugrass), Lolium multiflorum (annual ryegrass), and Avena strigosa (black oats) were defoliated from 20 to 80 % of their initial heights (25, 20, and 25 cm, respectively). At different increments in height, forage samples were collected to ground level and used to estimate tiller population density (TPD), leaf area per tiller (LA ), and forage mass. From these data, we calculated the leaf area index (LAI), average leaf area index (aLAI), and average and instantaneous forage accumulation rate (FAR and IFAR, respectively). Data were plotted over time (days) to describe LAI recovery and forage accumulation rates. As the defoliation intensity increased, greater canopy heights were needed for pastures to achieve their maximum forage accumulation rates, which required longer regrowth intervals. The need for high tiller recruitment after defoliation, which delayed canopy LAI recovery, seemed to be one of the main cause. Thus, grazing management strategies that involve costly tiller recruitment could decrease both overall forage production and sward persistence over time. However, the plant ability to recover LAI after successive intense defoliations seems to be species-dependent and related to their phenotypic plasticity.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183238
10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0095
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183238
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0095
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183238/169918
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricola
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricola
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 78 n. 2 (2021); e20190095
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 No. 2 (2021); e20190095
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 Núm. 2 (2021); e20190095
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1787713262216806400