Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Daniela Cardilli
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Rondon-Melo, Silmara, Molini-Avejonas, Daniela Regina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168735
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a low-cost screening test for identifying children at risk for language disorders with that of a specific language assessment. METHODS: The study was conducted during a polio vaccination campaign in basic health units in western Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil. The parents/guardians of 1000 children aged between 0 and 5 years were asked to answer questions of a specific screening test. The instrument consisted of a uniform set of questions about the main milestones in language development (from 0 to 5 years of age) with scaled scores to assess responses. There were no exclusion criteria. After the screening test, the children were referred to a specific language assessment by ABFW, following a determined flow of referrals. The results obtained in the screening were compared to those obtained in the specific language assessment; then, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were determined for the screening test. Children who failed the screening test also underwent an audiological evaluation. The statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The majority of the participants were aged between 4 and 5 years (21.82%) and were male (51.6%). The sensitivity and specificity values were 82.5% and 98.93%, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.907 (0.887–0.925), and the screening test showed 96% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The screening test showed high diagnostic efficiency in determining the risk of language disorders in children aged between 0 and 5 years.
id USP-19_220511cd8c2814d5b4780c836d22ee37
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/168735
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disordersPrimary Health CareChild LanguageLanguage DisordersRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityOBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a low-cost screening test for identifying children at risk for language disorders with that of a specific language assessment. METHODS: The study was conducted during a polio vaccination campaign in basic health units in western Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil. The parents/guardians of 1000 children aged between 0 and 5 years were asked to answer questions of a specific screening test. The instrument consisted of a uniform set of questions about the main milestones in language development (from 0 to 5 years of age) with scaled scores to assess responses. There were no exclusion criteria. After the screening test, the children were referred to a specific language assessment by ABFW, following a determined flow of referrals. The results obtained in the screening were compared to those obtained in the specific language assessment; then, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were determined for the screening test. Children who failed the screening test also underwent an audiological evaluation. The statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The majority of the participants were aged between 4 and 5 years (21.82%) and were male (51.6%). The sensitivity and specificity values were 82.5% and 98.93%, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.907 (0.887–0.925), and the screening test showed 96% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The screening test showed high diagnostic efficiency in determining the risk of language disorders in children aged between 0 and 5 years.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2020-04-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/16873510.6061/clinics/2020/e1426Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1426Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1426Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e14261980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168735/160222https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168735/160223Copyright (c) 2020 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Daniela CardilliRondon-Melo, SilmaraMolini-Avejonas, Daniela Regina2020-04-13T18:53:11Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/168735Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2020-04-13T18:53:11Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
title Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
spellingShingle Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
Dias, Daniela Cardilli
Primary Health Care
Child Language
Language Disorders
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
title_short Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
title_full Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
title_fullStr Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
title_sort Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
author Dias, Daniela Cardilli
author_facet Dias, Daniela Cardilli
Rondon-Melo, Silmara
Molini-Avejonas, Daniela Regina
author_role author
author2 Rondon-Melo, Silmara
Molini-Avejonas, Daniela Regina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Daniela Cardilli
Rondon-Melo, Silmara
Molini-Avejonas, Daniela Regina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Primary Health Care
Child Language
Language Disorders
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
topic Primary Health Care
Child Language
Language Disorders
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a low-cost screening test for identifying children at risk for language disorders with that of a specific language assessment. METHODS: The study was conducted during a polio vaccination campaign in basic health units in western Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil. The parents/guardians of 1000 children aged between 0 and 5 years were asked to answer questions of a specific screening test. The instrument consisted of a uniform set of questions about the main milestones in language development (from 0 to 5 years of age) with scaled scores to assess responses. There were no exclusion criteria. After the screening test, the children were referred to a specific language assessment by ABFW, following a determined flow of referrals. The results obtained in the screening were compared to those obtained in the specific language assessment; then, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were determined for the screening test. Children who failed the screening test also underwent an audiological evaluation. The statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The majority of the participants were aged between 4 and 5 years (21.82%) and were male (51.6%). The sensitivity and specificity values were 82.5% and 98.93%, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.907 (0.887–0.925), and the screening test showed 96% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The screening test showed high diagnostic efficiency in determining the risk of language disorders in children aged between 0 and 5 years.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168735
10.6061/clinics/2020/e1426
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168735
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1426
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168735/160222
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168735/160223
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1426
Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1426
Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1426
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222764734349312