Role of biological mesh in surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araujo, Sergio Eduardo Alonso
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Habr-Gama, Angelita, Teixeira, Magaly Gêmio, Caravatto, Pedro Paulo de Paris, Kiss, Desidério Roberto, Gama-Rodrigues, Joaquim
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17442
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Paracolostomy hernia is a frequent complication of intestinal stoma. Its correction can be made through relocation of the colostomy or by keeping it in place and performing abdominal wall reinforcement through direct suturing with or without a prosthesis. METHOD: Results of surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias were analyzed in 22 patients who underwent surgery in our hospital during the past 15 years, with or without biological mesh (bovine pericardium). All patients had terminal colostomies after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. RESULTS: In 15 (68.2%) patients, hernia correction was made by maintaining the colostomy in place, in 2 of them (9.1%) without reinforcement, and in the other 13 (59.1%) through reinforcement of the aponeurosis with biological mesh. In the 7 (31.8%) other patients, hernia correction was accomplished by relocation of the colostomy. The mean follow-up period was 50.2 months. Recurrence was observed in 3 (13.6%) patients after a median of 16 months post-correction. CONCLUSION: Paracolostomy hernia remains a surgical challenge due to its high recurrence rate. Primary repair using a prosthesis of biological material may be preferable since muscle-aponeurotic weakness is frequently observed.
id USP-19_2fc66b34904cd09dfc0633c27882a1c7
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/17442
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Role of biological mesh in surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias Uso de prótese biológica no tratamento cirúrgico de hérnias paracolostômicas Hérnia paracolostômicaConfecção de colostomiaTécnica cirúrgicaParacolostomy herniaColostomy constructionSurgical technique BACKGROUND: Paracolostomy hernia is a frequent complication of intestinal stoma. Its correction can be made through relocation of the colostomy or by keeping it in place and performing abdominal wall reinforcement through direct suturing with or without a prosthesis. METHOD: Results of surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias were analyzed in 22 patients who underwent surgery in our hospital during the past 15 years, with or without biological mesh (bovine pericardium). All patients had terminal colostomies after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. RESULTS: In 15 (68.2%) patients, hernia correction was made by maintaining the colostomy in place, in 2 of them (9.1%) without reinforcement, and in the other 13 (59.1%) through reinforcement of the aponeurosis with biological mesh. In the 7 (31.8%) other patients, hernia correction was accomplished by relocation of the colostomy. The mean follow-up period was 50.2 months. Recurrence was observed in 3 (13.6%) patients after a median of 16 months post-correction. CONCLUSION: Paracolostomy hernia remains a surgical challenge due to its high recurrence rate. Primary repair using a prosthesis of biological material may be preferable since muscle-aponeurotic weakness is frequently observed. Hérnias paracolostômicas são complicações freqüentes de estomas intestinais. A correção pode ser realizada através do seu reposicionamento ou mantendo a mesma localização, associada ao reforço da parede abdominal com ou sem o emprego de prótese. MÉTODOS: Os resultados do tratamento cirúrgico de hérnias paracolostômicas são analisados em 22 pacientes em nosso serviço nos últimos 15 anos. Todos os pacientes eram portadores de colostomias terminais após ressecção abdominoperineal do reto. RESULTADOS: Em 15 (68,2%) pacientes, a correção da hérnia foi realizada mantendo-se a colostomia no local original, em 2 (9,1%) deles através de herniorrafia simples e em 13 (59,1%) com reforço da aponeurose com prótese biológica. Nos outros 7 (31,8%) pacientes, a correção foi realizada por reposicionamento da colostomia. O seguimento médio pós-operatório foi de 50,2 meses. Recidiva foi observada em 3 (13,6%) casos (em média 16 meses após correção). CONCLUSÃO: A hérnia paracolostômica continua a ser um desafio cirúrgico devido a sua elevada recidiva. Correção primária com prótese pode ser favorecida, uma vez que freqüentemente se observa fraqueza da aponeurose. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2005-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1744210.1590/S1807-59322005000400003Clinics; v. 60 n. 4 (2005); 271-276 Clinics; Vol. 60 Núm. 4 (2005); 271-276 Clinics; Vol. 60 No. 4 (2005); 271-276 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17442/19494Araujo, Sergio Eduardo AlonsoHabr-Gama, AngelitaTeixeira, Magaly GêmioCaravatto, Pedro Paulo de ParisKiss, Desidério RobertoGama-Rodrigues, Joaquiminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-22T18:00:09Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/17442Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-22T18:00:09Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Role of biological mesh in surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias
Uso de prótese biológica no tratamento cirúrgico de hérnias paracolostômicas
title Role of biological mesh in surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias
spellingShingle Role of biological mesh in surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias
Araujo, Sergio Eduardo Alonso
Hérnia paracolostômica
Confecção de colostomia
Técnica cirúrgica
Paracolostomy hernia
Colostomy construction
Surgical technique
title_short Role of biological mesh in surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias
title_full Role of biological mesh in surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias
title_fullStr Role of biological mesh in surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias
title_full_unstemmed Role of biological mesh in surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias
title_sort Role of biological mesh in surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias
author Araujo, Sergio Eduardo Alonso
author_facet Araujo, Sergio Eduardo Alonso
Habr-Gama, Angelita
Teixeira, Magaly Gêmio
Caravatto, Pedro Paulo de Paris
Kiss, Desidério Roberto
Gama-Rodrigues, Joaquim
author_role author
author2 Habr-Gama, Angelita
Teixeira, Magaly Gêmio
Caravatto, Pedro Paulo de Paris
Kiss, Desidério Roberto
Gama-Rodrigues, Joaquim
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araujo, Sergio Eduardo Alonso
Habr-Gama, Angelita
Teixeira, Magaly Gêmio
Caravatto, Pedro Paulo de Paris
Kiss, Desidério Roberto
Gama-Rodrigues, Joaquim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hérnia paracolostômica
Confecção de colostomia
Técnica cirúrgica
Paracolostomy hernia
Colostomy construction
Surgical technique
topic Hérnia paracolostômica
Confecção de colostomia
Técnica cirúrgica
Paracolostomy hernia
Colostomy construction
Surgical technique
description BACKGROUND: Paracolostomy hernia is a frequent complication of intestinal stoma. Its correction can be made through relocation of the colostomy or by keeping it in place and performing abdominal wall reinforcement through direct suturing with or without a prosthesis. METHOD: Results of surgical treatment of paracolostomy hernias were analyzed in 22 patients who underwent surgery in our hospital during the past 15 years, with or without biological mesh (bovine pericardium). All patients had terminal colostomies after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. RESULTS: In 15 (68.2%) patients, hernia correction was made by maintaining the colostomy in place, in 2 of them (9.1%) without reinforcement, and in the other 13 (59.1%) through reinforcement of the aponeurosis with biological mesh. In the 7 (31.8%) other patients, hernia correction was accomplished by relocation of the colostomy. The mean follow-up period was 50.2 months. Recurrence was observed in 3 (13.6%) patients after a median of 16 months post-correction. CONCLUSION: Paracolostomy hernia remains a surgical challenge due to its high recurrence rate. Primary repair using a prosthesis of biological material may be preferable since muscle-aponeurotic weakness is frequently observed.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17442
10.1590/S1807-59322005000400003
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17442
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322005000400003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17442/19494
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; v. 60 n. 4 (2005); 271-276
Clinics; Vol. 60 Núm. 4 (2005); 271-276
Clinics; Vol. 60 No. 4 (2005); 271-276
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1787713167200092160