Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Minozzo, Fábio Carderelli
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Lira, Claudio Andre Barbosa de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/53169
Resumo: Muscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an increased number of cross-bridges. The first hypothesis uses sarcomere non-homogeneity and instability to explain how "weak" sarcomeres would convey the higher tension generated by an enhanced overlap from "stronger" sarcomeres, allowing the whole system to produce higher forces than predicted by the force-length relationship; non-uniformity provides theoretical support for a large amount of the experimental data. The second hypothesis suggests that passive elements within the sarcomeres (i.e., titin) could gain strain upon calcium activation followed by stretch. Finally, the third hypothesis suggests that muscle stretch after activation would alter cross-bridge kinetics to increase the number of attached cross-bridges. Presently, we cannot completely rule out any of the three hypotheses. Different experimental results suggest that the mechanisms on which these three hypotheses are based could all coexist.
id USP-19_3b44bce8de22949436d3957bf173a94b
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/53169
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review Force EnhancementStretchMuscleFibersMyofibrils Muscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an increased number of cross-bridges. The first hypothesis uses sarcomere non-homogeneity and instability to explain how "weak" sarcomeres would convey the higher tension generated by an enhanced overlap from "stronger" sarcomeres, allowing the whole system to produce higher forces than predicted by the force-length relationship; non-uniformity provides theoretical support for a large amount of the experimental data. The second hypothesis suggests that passive elements within the sarcomeres (i.e., titin) could gain strain upon calcium activation followed by stretch. Finally, the third hypothesis suggests that muscle stretch after activation would alter cross-bridge kinetics to increase the number of attached cross-bridges. Presently, we cannot completely rule out any of the three hypotheses. Different experimental results suggest that the mechanisms on which these three hypotheses are based could all coexist. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/5316910.6061/CLINICS/2013(02)R01Clinics; v. 68 n. 2 (2013); 269-274 Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 2 (2013); 269-274 Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 2 (2013); 269-274 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/53169/57230Minozzo, Fábio CarderelliLira, Claudio Andre Barbosa deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-04-08T20:40:37Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/53169Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2013-04-08T20:40:37Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
title Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
spellingShingle Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
Minozzo, Fábio Carderelli
Force Enhancement
Stretch
Muscle
Fibers
Myofibrils
title_short Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
title_full Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
title_fullStr Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
title_full_unstemmed Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
title_sort Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
author Minozzo, Fábio Carderelli
author_facet Minozzo, Fábio Carderelli
Lira, Claudio Andre Barbosa de
author_role author
author2 Lira, Claudio Andre Barbosa de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Minozzo, Fábio Carderelli
Lira, Claudio Andre Barbosa de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Force Enhancement
Stretch
Muscle
Fibers
Myofibrils
topic Force Enhancement
Stretch
Muscle
Fibers
Myofibrils
description Muscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an increased number of cross-bridges. The first hypothesis uses sarcomere non-homogeneity and instability to explain how "weak" sarcomeres would convey the higher tension generated by an enhanced overlap from "stronger" sarcomeres, allowing the whole system to produce higher forces than predicted by the force-length relationship; non-uniformity provides theoretical support for a large amount of the experimental data. The second hypothesis suggests that passive elements within the sarcomeres (i.e., titin) could gain strain upon calcium activation followed by stretch. Finally, the third hypothesis suggests that muscle stretch after activation would alter cross-bridge kinetics to increase the number of attached cross-bridges. Presently, we cannot completely rule out any of the three hypotheses. Different experimental results suggest that the mechanisms on which these three hypotheses are based could all coexist.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/53169
10.6061/CLINICS/2013(02)R01
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/53169
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/CLINICS/2013(02)R01
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/53169/57230
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; v. 68 n. 2 (2013); 269-274
Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 2 (2013); 269-274
Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 2 (2013); 269-274
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1787713176145494016