Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Filomeno, Luiz Tarcísio Brito
Publication Date: 2009
Other Authors: Campos, José Ribas Milanez de, Machuca, Tiago Noguchi, Neves-Pereira, João Carlos das, Terra, Ricardo Mingarini
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Clinics
Download full: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17995
Summary: OBJECTIVES: We developed a prosthesis for open pleurostomy cases where pulmonary decortication is not indicated, or where post-pneumonectomy space infection occurs. The open pleural window procedure not only creates a large hole in the chest wall that is shocking to patients, also results in a permanent deformation of the thorax. prosthesis for open pleurostomy is a self-retained silicone tube that requires the removal of 3 cm of one rib for insertion, and acts as a mature conventional open pleural window. Herein, we report our 13-year experience with this device in the management of different kinds of pleural empyema. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with chronic empyema were treated. The etiology of empyema was diverse: pneumonia, 20; lung resections, 12 (pneumonectomies, 7; lobectomies, 4; non-anatomical, 1); mixed-tuberculous, 6; and mixed-malignant pleural effusion, 6. After debridment of both pleural surfaces, the prosthesis for open pleurostomy was inserted and attached to a small recipient plastic bag. RESULTS: Infection control was achieved in 20/20 (100%) of the parapneumonic empyemas, in 3/4 (75%) of post-lobectomies, in 6/7 (85%) of post-pneumectomies, in 6/6 (100%) of mixed-tuberculous cases, and in 4/6 (83%) of mixed-malignant cases. Lung re-expansion was also successful in 93%, 75%, 33%, and 40% of the groups, respectively CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis for open pleurostomy insertion is a minimally invasive procedure that can be as effective as conventional open pleural window for management of chronic empyemas. Thus, we propose that the use of prosthesis for open pleurostomy should replace the conventional method.
id USP-19_510495419420c41907d5a003c3094c53
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/17995
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas Open Pleural WindowPleurostomyEmpyemaPleural EffusionPulmonary Decortication OBJECTIVES: We developed a prosthesis for open pleurostomy cases where pulmonary decortication is not indicated, or where post-pneumonectomy space infection occurs. The open pleural window procedure not only creates a large hole in the chest wall that is shocking to patients, also results in a permanent deformation of the thorax. prosthesis for open pleurostomy is a self-retained silicone tube that requires the removal of 3 cm of one rib for insertion, and acts as a mature conventional open pleural window. Herein, we report our 13-year experience with this device in the management of different kinds of pleural empyema. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with chronic empyema were treated. The etiology of empyema was diverse: pneumonia, 20; lung resections, 12 (pneumonectomies, 7; lobectomies, 4; non-anatomical, 1); mixed-tuberculous, 6; and mixed-malignant pleural effusion, 6. After debridment of both pleural surfaces, the prosthesis for open pleurostomy was inserted and attached to a small recipient plastic bag. RESULTS: Infection control was achieved in 20/20 (100%) of the parapneumonic empyemas, in 3/4 (75%) of post-lobectomies, in 6/7 (85%) of post-pneumectomies, in 6/6 (100%) of mixed-tuberculous cases, and in 4/6 (83%) of mixed-malignant cases. Lung re-expansion was also successful in 93%, 75%, 33%, and 40% of the groups, respectively CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis for open pleurostomy insertion is a minimally invasive procedure that can be as effective as conventional open pleural window for management of chronic empyemas. Thus, we propose that the use of prosthesis for open pleurostomy should replace the conventional method. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2009-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1799510.1590/S1807-59322009000300010Clinics; v. 64 n. 3 (2009); 203-208 Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 3 (2009); 203-208 Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 3 (2009); 203-208 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17995/20060Filomeno, Luiz Tarcísio BritoCampos, José Ribas Milanez deMachuca, Tiago NoguchiNeves-Pereira, João Carlos dasTerra, Ricardo Mingariniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-22T18:50:15Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/17995Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-22T18:50:15Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas
title Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas
spellingShingle Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas
Filomeno, Luiz Tarcísio Brito
Open Pleural Window
Pleurostomy
Empyema
Pleural Effusion
Pulmonary Decortication
title_short Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas
title_full Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas
title_fullStr Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas
title_full_unstemmed Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas
title_sort Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas
author Filomeno, Luiz Tarcísio Brito
author_facet Filomeno, Luiz Tarcísio Brito
Campos, José Ribas Milanez de
Machuca, Tiago Noguchi
Neves-Pereira, João Carlos das
Terra, Ricardo Mingarini
author_role author
author2 Campos, José Ribas Milanez de
Machuca, Tiago Noguchi
Neves-Pereira, João Carlos das
Terra, Ricardo Mingarini
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Filomeno, Luiz Tarcísio Brito
Campos, José Ribas Milanez de
Machuca, Tiago Noguchi
Neves-Pereira, João Carlos das
Terra, Ricardo Mingarini
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Open Pleural Window
Pleurostomy
Empyema
Pleural Effusion
Pulmonary Decortication
topic Open Pleural Window
Pleurostomy
Empyema
Pleural Effusion
Pulmonary Decortication
description OBJECTIVES: We developed a prosthesis for open pleurostomy cases where pulmonary decortication is not indicated, or where post-pneumonectomy space infection occurs. The open pleural window procedure not only creates a large hole in the chest wall that is shocking to patients, also results in a permanent deformation of the thorax. prosthesis for open pleurostomy is a self-retained silicone tube that requires the removal of 3 cm of one rib for insertion, and acts as a mature conventional open pleural window. Herein, we report our 13-year experience with this device in the management of different kinds of pleural empyema. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with chronic empyema were treated. The etiology of empyema was diverse: pneumonia, 20; lung resections, 12 (pneumonectomies, 7; lobectomies, 4; non-anatomical, 1); mixed-tuberculous, 6; and mixed-malignant pleural effusion, 6. After debridment of both pleural surfaces, the prosthesis for open pleurostomy was inserted and attached to a small recipient plastic bag. RESULTS: Infection control was achieved in 20/20 (100%) of the parapneumonic empyemas, in 3/4 (75%) of post-lobectomies, in 6/7 (85%) of post-pneumectomies, in 6/6 (100%) of mixed-tuberculous cases, and in 4/6 (83%) of mixed-malignant cases. Lung re-expansion was also successful in 93%, 75%, 33%, and 40% of the groups, respectively CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis for open pleurostomy insertion is a minimally invasive procedure that can be as effective as conventional open pleural window for management of chronic empyemas. Thus, we propose that the use of prosthesis for open pleurostomy should replace the conventional method.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17995
10.1590/S1807-59322009000300010
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17995
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322009000300010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17995/20060
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; v. 64 n. 3 (2009); 203-208
Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 3 (2009); 203-208
Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 3 (2009); 203-208
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1787713170013421568