Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212800 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: Demonstrate that continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) may be an alternative with adequate analgesia and a lower incidence of side effects for ischemic pain due peripheral obstructive arterial disease (POAD). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with 21 patients with POAD, Fontaine IV graded, with foot pain. Patients were submitted to continuous sciatic nerve block (CSNB), through a perineural catheter. Primary outcomes were pain intensity (by numerical rating scale) and opioid consumption (in oral morphine equivalents). RESULTS: During CSNB, pain scores markedly decreased in comparison to the pre-block period. CONCLUSIONS: CPNB may be a good option for ischemic pain treatment in in-patients, as it provides effective pain control with fewer adverse effects. |
id |
USP-19_b28a5c59cfc97a49dbd2d4dc226458a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/212800 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic painPeripheral Arterial DiseasePeripheral Vascular DiseaseRegional AnesthesiaContinuous Peripheral Nerve BlockNerve BlockAnalgesiaPain ManagementOBJECTIVES: Demonstrate that continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) may be an alternative with adequate analgesia and a lower incidence of side effects for ischemic pain due peripheral obstructive arterial disease (POAD). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with 21 patients with POAD, Fontaine IV graded, with foot pain. Patients were submitted to continuous sciatic nerve block (CSNB), through a perineural catheter. Primary outcomes were pain intensity (by numerical rating scale) and opioid consumption (in oral morphine equivalents). RESULTS: During CSNB, pain scores markedly decreased in comparison to the pre-block period. CONCLUSIONS: CPNB may be a good option for ischemic pain treatment in in-patients, as it provides effective pain control with fewer adverse effects.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2021-05-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/21280010.6061/clinics/2021/e2805Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2805Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2805Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e28051980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212800/194762Copyright (c) 2023 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Hermann dos SantosXimenes, Jorge Luiz SaraivaTaguchi, Paloma KiyomiEspada, Eloisa BonettiGouvêa, Áquila LopesVieira, Joaquim EdsonAshmawi, Hazem Adel2023-06-05T00:32:17Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/212800Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-06-05T00:32:17Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain |
title |
Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain |
spellingShingle |
Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain Fernandes, Hermann dos Santos Peripheral Arterial Disease Peripheral Vascular Disease Regional Anesthesia Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Nerve Block Analgesia Pain Management |
title_short |
Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain |
title_full |
Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain |
title_fullStr |
Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain |
title_full_unstemmed |
Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain |
title_sort |
Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain |
author |
Fernandes, Hermann dos Santos |
author_facet |
Fernandes, Hermann dos Santos Ximenes, Jorge Luiz Saraiva Taguchi, Paloma Kiyomi Espada, Eloisa Bonetti Gouvêa, Áquila Lopes Vieira, Joaquim Edson Ashmawi, Hazem Adel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ximenes, Jorge Luiz Saraiva Taguchi, Paloma Kiyomi Espada, Eloisa Bonetti Gouvêa, Áquila Lopes Vieira, Joaquim Edson Ashmawi, Hazem Adel |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Hermann dos Santos Ximenes, Jorge Luiz Saraiva Taguchi, Paloma Kiyomi Espada, Eloisa Bonetti Gouvêa, Áquila Lopes Vieira, Joaquim Edson Ashmawi, Hazem Adel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Peripheral Arterial Disease Peripheral Vascular Disease Regional Anesthesia Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Nerve Block Analgesia Pain Management |
topic |
Peripheral Arterial Disease Peripheral Vascular Disease Regional Anesthesia Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Nerve Block Analgesia Pain Management |
description |
OBJECTIVES: Demonstrate that continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) may be an alternative with adequate analgesia and a lower incidence of side effects for ischemic pain due peripheral obstructive arterial disease (POAD). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with 21 patients with POAD, Fontaine IV graded, with foot pain. Patients were submitted to continuous sciatic nerve block (CSNB), through a perineural catheter. Primary outcomes were pain intensity (by numerical rating scale) and opioid consumption (in oral morphine equivalents). RESULTS: During CSNB, pain scores markedly decreased in comparison to the pre-block period. CONCLUSIONS: CPNB may be a good option for ischemic pain treatment in in-patients, as it provides effective pain control with fewer adverse effects. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212800 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2805 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212800 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2021/e2805 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212800/194762 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2805 Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2805 Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2805 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1787713182856380416 |