Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Hermann dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ximenes, Jorge Luiz Saraiva, Taguchi, Paloma Kiyomi, Espada, Eloisa Bonetti, Gouvêa, Áquila Lopes, Vieira, Joaquim Edson, Ashmawi, Hazem Adel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212800
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: Demonstrate that continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) may be an alternative with adequate analgesia and a lower incidence of side effects for ischemic pain due peripheral obstructive arterial disease (POAD). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with 21 patients with POAD, Fontaine IV graded, with foot pain. Patients were submitted to continuous sciatic nerve block (CSNB), through a perineural catheter. Primary outcomes were pain intensity (by numerical rating scale) and opioid consumption (in oral morphine equivalents). RESULTS: During CSNB, pain scores markedly decreased in comparison to the pre-block period. CONCLUSIONS: CPNB may be a good option for ischemic pain treatment in in-patients, as it provides effective pain control with fewer adverse effects.
id USP-19_b28a5c59cfc97a49dbd2d4dc226458a1
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/212800
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic painPeripheral Arterial DiseasePeripheral Vascular DiseaseRegional AnesthesiaContinuous Peripheral Nerve BlockNerve BlockAnalgesiaPain ManagementOBJECTIVES: Demonstrate that continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) may be an alternative with adequate analgesia and a lower incidence of side effects for ischemic pain due peripheral obstructive arterial disease (POAD). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with 21 patients with POAD, Fontaine IV graded, with foot pain. Patients were submitted to continuous sciatic nerve block (CSNB), through a perineural catheter. Primary outcomes were pain intensity (by numerical rating scale) and opioid consumption (in oral morphine equivalents). RESULTS: During CSNB, pain scores markedly decreased in comparison to the pre-block period. CONCLUSIONS: CPNB may be a good option for ischemic pain treatment in in-patients, as it provides effective pain control with fewer adverse effects.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2021-05-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/21280010.6061/clinics/2021/e2805Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2805Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2805Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e28051980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212800/194762Copyright (c) 2023 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Hermann dos SantosXimenes, Jorge Luiz SaraivaTaguchi, Paloma KiyomiEspada, Eloisa BonettiGouvêa, Áquila LopesVieira, Joaquim EdsonAshmawi, Hazem Adel2023-06-05T00:32:17Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/212800Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-06-05T00:32:17Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain
title Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain
spellingShingle Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain
Fernandes, Hermann dos Santos
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Regional Anesthesia
Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block
Nerve Block
Analgesia
Pain Management
title_short Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain
title_full Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain
title_fullStr Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain
title_full_unstemmed Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain
title_sort Continuous peripheral nerve block for in-patients with lower limb ischemic pain
author Fernandes, Hermann dos Santos
author_facet Fernandes, Hermann dos Santos
Ximenes, Jorge Luiz Saraiva
Taguchi, Paloma Kiyomi
Espada, Eloisa Bonetti
Gouvêa, Áquila Lopes
Vieira, Joaquim Edson
Ashmawi, Hazem Adel
author_role author
author2 Ximenes, Jorge Luiz Saraiva
Taguchi, Paloma Kiyomi
Espada, Eloisa Bonetti
Gouvêa, Áquila Lopes
Vieira, Joaquim Edson
Ashmawi, Hazem Adel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Hermann dos Santos
Ximenes, Jorge Luiz Saraiva
Taguchi, Paloma Kiyomi
Espada, Eloisa Bonetti
Gouvêa, Áquila Lopes
Vieira, Joaquim Edson
Ashmawi, Hazem Adel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Regional Anesthesia
Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block
Nerve Block
Analgesia
Pain Management
topic Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Regional Anesthesia
Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block
Nerve Block
Analgesia
Pain Management
description OBJECTIVES: Demonstrate that continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) may be an alternative with adequate analgesia and a lower incidence of side effects for ischemic pain due peripheral obstructive arterial disease (POAD). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with 21 patients with POAD, Fontaine IV graded, with foot pain. Patients were submitted to continuous sciatic nerve block (CSNB), through a perineural catheter. Primary outcomes were pain intensity (by numerical rating scale) and opioid consumption (in oral morphine equivalents). RESULTS: During CSNB, pain scores markedly decreased in comparison to the pre-block period. CONCLUSIONS: CPNB may be a good option for ischemic pain treatment in in-patients, as it provides effective pain control with fewer adverse effects.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212800
10.6061/clinics/2021/e2805
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212800
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2805
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212800/194762
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2805
Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2805
Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2805
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1787713182856380416