Analysis of instruments for screening of childhood development

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sigolo, Ana Regina Lucato
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Aiello, Ana Lúcia Rossito
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7266
Resumo: The literature shows the importance of early identification of child development delays and difficulty in choosing assessment instruments. The objectives of this study were to compare the Denver II and RDB with a scale of reference (EEDP) concerning children identification with delay of development; to verify difference in the results considering gender of the participants and to investigate results convergence of the scales. Participants were 24 babies with ages ranging from five to 11 months, both sex, attending to local nurseries. The instruments were administered individually and sequentially pre-defined. Statistical analysis revealed that the scale RDB and the Denver II may not be considered similar to the scale EEDP. Considering sex, there was no significant difference. There was no convergence of faulty items in the areas. Therefore, important to be careful on the choice of instruments for screening and obtaining information from different sources on child development.
id USP-22_efa43ed30adec8d4efe273ea84484163
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/7266
network_acronym_str USP-22
network_name_str Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of instruments for screening of childhood development Análisis de instrumentos para la selección del desarrollo infantil Análise de instrumentos para triagem do desenvolvimento infantil desenvolvimento infantilescalas de desenvolvimentotriagemdesarrollo infantilescalas de desarrollotriajechildhood developmentdevelopment scalestriage The literature shows the importance of early identification of child development delays and difficulty in choosing assessment instruments. The objectives of this study were to compare the Denver II and RDB with a scale of reference (EEDP) concerning children identification with delay of development; to verify difference in the results considering gender of the participants and to investigate results convergence of the scales. Participants were 24 babies with ages ranging from five to 11 months, both sex, attending to local nurseries. The instruments were administered individually and sequentially pre-defined. Statistical analysis revealed that the scale RDB and the Denver II may not be considered similar to the scale EEDP. Considering sex, there was no significant difference. There was no convergence of faulty items in the areas. Therefore, important to be careful on the choice of instruments for screening and obtaining information from different sources on child development. La literatura muestra la importancia de la identificación temprana de signos de retraso en el desarrollo del niño y la dificultad en la elección de instrumentos de evaluación. El objetivo fue comparar el Denver II y la EDC con una escala de referencia (EEDP) cuanto a la identificación de los niños con retraso en el desarrollo; verificar la diferencia en los resultados, teniendo en cuenta el género de los participantes e investigar la convergencia de los resultados de las escalas. Participaron 24 bebés con edades entre cinco y once meses, de ambos sexos, que iban a guarderías municipales. Los instrumentos fueron administrados individualmente o en secuencia predeterminada. El análisis estadístico mostró que la escala de EDC y el Denver II no puede considerarse similar a la escala EEDP. En cuanto al sexo, no hubo diferencia significativa. No hubo convergencia de los puntos malogrados según las áreas. Por lo tanto, es importante ser cuidadoso en la elección de los instrumentos de selección y obtener informaciones procedentes de diferentes fuentes sobre el desarrollo del niño. A literatura mostra a importância da identificação precoce de sinais de atraso no desenvolvimento infantil e a dificuldade na escolha de instrumentos de avaliação. Os objetivos foram comparar o Denver II e a EDC com uma escala de referência (EEDP) quanto à identificação de crianças com atraso de desenvolvimento, verificar diferença nos resultados considerando gênero dos participantes e averiguar a convergência dos resultados das escalas. Participaram 24 bebês de cinco a onze meses, de ambos os sexos, frequentadores de creches municipais. Os instrumentos foram aplicados individualmente e em sequência pré-definida. A análise estatística revelou que a escala EDC e o Denver II não podem ser considerados semelhantes à escala EEDP. Quanto ao gênero, não houve diferença significativa. Não houve convergência de itens falhos segundo as áreas. Assim, é importante ter cautela na escolha de instrumentos para triagem e obter informações de diferentes fontes sobre o desenvolvimento da criança. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto2011-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/726610.1590/S0103-863X2011000100007Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 21 n. 48 (2011); 51-60 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 21 No. 48 (2011); 51-60 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 21 Núm. 48 (2011); 51-60 1982-43270103-863Xreponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7266/8749Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSigolo, Ana Regina LucatoAiello, Ana Lúcia Rossito2012-05-03T16:55:28Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/7266Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideiaPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/oai||paideia@usp.br1982-43270103-863Xopendoar:2012-05-03T16:55:28Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of instruments for screening of childhood development
Análisis de instrumentos para la selección del desarrollo infantil
Análise de instrumentos para triagem do desenvolvimento infantil
title Analysis of instruments for screening of childhood development
spellingShingle Analysis of instruments for screening of childhood development
Sigolo, Ana Regina Lucato
desenvolvimento infantil
escalas de desenvolvimento
triagem
desarrollo infantil
escalas de desarrollo
triaje
childhood development
development scales
triage
title_short Analysis of instruments for screening of childhood development
title_full Analysis of instruments for screening of childhood development
title_fullStr Analysis of instruments for screening of childhood development
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of instruments for screening of childhood development
title_sort Analysis of instruments for screening of childhood development
author Sigolo, Ana Regina Lucato
author_facet Sigolo, Ana Regina Lucato
Aiello, Ana Lúcia Rossito
author_role author
author2 Aiello, Ana Lúcia Rossito
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sigolo, Ana Regina Lucato
Aiello, Ana Lúcia Rossito
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv desenvolvimento infantil
escalas de desenvolvimento
triagem
desarrollo infantil
escalas de desarrollo
triaje
childhood development
development scales
triage
topic desenvolvimento infantil
escalas de desenvolvimento
triagem
desarrollo infantil
escalas de desarrollo
triaje
childhood development
development scales
triage
description The literature shows the importance of early identification of child development delays and difficulty in choosing assessment instruments. The objectives of this study were to compare the Denver II and RDB with a scale of reference (EEDP) concerning children identification with delay of development; to verify difference in the results considering gender of the participants and to investigate results convergence of the scales. Participants were 24 babies with ages ranging from five to 11 months, both sex, attending to local nurseries. The instruments were administered individually and sequentially pre-defined. Statistical analysis revealed that the scale RDB and the Denver II may not be considered similar to the scale EEDP. Considering sex, there was no significant difference. There was no convergence of faulty items in the areas. Therefore, important to be careful on the choice of instruments for screening and obtaining information from different sources on child development.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7266
10.1590/S0103-863X2011000100007
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7266
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-863X2011000100007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7266/8749
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 21 n. 48 (2011); 51-60
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 21 No. 48 (2011); 51-60
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 21 Núm. 48 (2011); 51-60
1982-4327
0103-863X
reponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
collection Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||paideia@usp.br
_version_ 1800221832407678976

Registros relacionados