Cross-cultural validity of the demand-control questionnaire: Swedish and Brazilian workers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hökerberg,Yara Hahr Marques
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Reichenheim,Michael Eduardo, Faerstein,Eduardo, Passos,Sonia Regina Lambert, Fritzell,Johan, Toivanen,Susanna, Westerlund,Hugo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000300486
Resumo: OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cross-cultural validity of the Demand-Control Questionnaire, comparing the original Swedish questionnaire with the Brazilian version. METHODS We compared data from 362 Swedish and 399 Brazilian health workers. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were performed to test structural validity, using the robust weighted least squares mean and variance-adjusted (WLSMV) estimator. Construct validity, using hypotheses testing, was evaluated through the inspection of the mean score distribution of the scale dimensions according to sociodemographic and social support at work variables. RESULTS The confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses supported the instrument in three dimensions (for Swedish and Brazilians): psychological demands, skill discretion and decision authority. The best-fit model was achieved by including an error correlation between work fast and work intensely (psychological demands) and removing the item repetitive work (skill discretion). Hypotheses testing showed that workers with university degree had higher scores on skill discretion and decision authority and those with high levels of Social Support at Work had lower scores on psychological demands and higher scores on decision authority. CONCLUSIONS The results supported the equivalent dimensional structures across the two culturally different work contexts. Skill discretion and decision authority formed two distinct dimensions and the item repetitive work should be removed.
id USP-23_e396e2f51564a3fbecc6590c1686e297
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-89102014000300486
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Cross-cultural validity of the demand-control questionnaire: Swedish and Brazilian workersQuestionnairesWorking ConditionsStress, PsychologicalCross-Cultural ComparisonValidation StudiesFactor analysis, Statistical OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cross-cultural validity of the Demand-Control Questionnaire, comparing the original Swedish questionnaire with the Brazilian version. METHODS We compared data from 362 Swedish and 399 Brazilian health workers. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were performed to test structural validity, using the robust weighted least squares mean and variance-adjusted (WLSMV) estimator. Construct validity, using hypotheses testing, was evaluated through the inspection of the mean score distribution of the scale dimensions according to sociodemographic and social support at work variables. RESULTS The confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses supported the instrument in three dimensions (for Swedish and Brazilians): psychological demands, skill discretion and decision authority. The best-fit model was achieved by including an error correlation between work fast and work intensely (psychological demands) and removing the item repetitive work (skill discretion). Hypotheses testing showed that workers with university degree had higher scores on skill discretion and decision authority and those with high levels of Social Support at Work had lower scores on psychological demands and higher scores on decision authority. CONCLUSIONS The results supported the equivalent dimensional structures across the two culturally different work contexts. Skill discretion and decision authority formed two distinct dimensions and the item repetitive work should be removed. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000300486Revista de Saúde Pública v.48 n.3 2014reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005126info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHökerberg,Yara Hahr MarquesReichenheim,Michael EduardoFaerstein,EduardoPassos,Sonia Regina LambertFritzell,JohanToivanen,SusannaWesterlund,Hugoeng2014-09-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-89102014000300486Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-8910&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2014-09-23T00:00Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cross-cultural validity of the demand-control questionnaire: Swedish and Brazilian workers
title Cross-cultural validity of the demand-control questionnaire: Swedish and Brazilian workers
spellingShingle Cross-cultural validity of the demand-control questionnaire: Swedish and Brazilian workers
Hökerberg,Yara Hahr Marques
Questionnaires
Working Conditions
Stress, Psychological
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Validation Studies
Factor analysis, Statistical
title_short Cross-cultural validity of the demand-control questionnaire: Swedish and Brazilian workers
title_full Cross-cultural validity of the demand-control questionnaire: Swedish and Brazilian workers
title_fullStr Cross-cultural validity of the demand-control questionnaire: Swedish and Brazilian workers
title_full_unstemmed Cross-cultural validity of the demand-control questionnaire: Swedish and Brazilian workers
title_sort Cross-cultural validity of the demand-control questionnaire: Swedish and Brazilian workers
author Hökerberg,Yara Hahr Marques
author_facet Hökerberg,Yara Hahr Marques
Reichenheim,Michael Eduardo
Faerstein,Eduardo
Passos,Sonia Regina Lambert
Fritzell,Johan
Toivanen,Susanna
Westerlund,Hugo
author_role author
author2 Reichenheim,Michael Eduardo
Faerstein,Eduardo
Passos,Sonia Regina Lambert
Fritzell,Johan
Toivanen,Susanna
Westerlund,Hugo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hökerberg,Yara Hahr Marques
Reichenheim,Michael Eduardo
Faerstein,Eduardo
Passos,Sonia Regina Lambert
Fritzell,Johan
Toivanen,Susanna
Westerlund,Hugo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Questionnaires
Working Conditions
Stress, Psychological
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Validation Studies
Factor analysis, Statistical
topic Questionnaires
Working Conditions
Stress, Psychological
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Validation Studies
Factor analysis, Statistical
description OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cross-cultural validity of the Demand-Control Questionnaire, comparing the original Swedish questionnaire with the Brazilian version. METHODS We compared data from 362 Swedish and 399 Brazilian health workers. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were performed to test structural validity, using the robust weighted least squares mean and variance-adjusted (WLSMV) estimator. Construct validity, using hypotheses testing, was evaluated through the inspection of the mean score distribution of the scale dimensions according to sociodemographic and social support at work variables. RESULTS The confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses supported the instrument in three dimensions (for Swedish and Brazilians): psychological demands, skill discretion and decision authority. The best-fit model was achieved by including an error correlation between work fast and work intensely (psychological demands) and removing the item repetitive work (skill discretion). Hypotheses testing showed that workers with university degree had higher scores on skill discretion and decision authority and those with high levels of Social Support at Work had lower scores on psychological demands and higher scores on decision authority. CONCLUSIONS The results supported the equivalent dimensional structures across the two culturally different work contexts. Skill discretion and decision authority formed two distinct dimensions and the item repetitive work should be removed.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000300486
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000300486
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005126
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública v.48 n.3 2014
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1748936502759391232