Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Thais Marques
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Teles, Liana Mara Rocha, Oliveira, Amanda Souza de, Campos, Fernanda Camara, Barbosa, Rita de Cassia Carvalho, Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra, Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087
Resumo: This is a study for assessment of a quantitative approach in pregnant women (N=104), in which findings of vaginal infection were compared. The findings were obtained by two means, flowchart of vaginal discharge, and typical examinations in the clinical nursing practice. Data were collected from January to July 2011 through interviews and gynecological examinations. The flowchart showed no efficacy to identify candidiasis and trichomoniasis. Furthermore, it showed low sensitivity (0.0%; 50%) and positive predictive value (0.0%; 3.6%) for both infections, and low specificity for trichomoniasis (46%). The flowchart was shown to be satisfactory for bacterial vaginosis, with high sensitivity (100%), negative predictive value (100%), and accuracy (74%). We conclude that use of the flowchart should be reassessed, as it was not able to identify important infections in pregnant women. A continuous effort must be directed for development of effective tests in order to prevent the spread of infection and reduce the number of unnecessary treatments.
id USP-24_2044e3c6a1f59d2470fcc0d1dcad1a6d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/78087
network_acronym_str USP-24
network_name_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeriaCorrimentos vaginais em gestantes: comparacao da abordagem sindromica com exames da pratica clinica da enfermagemVaginal discharge in pregnant women: comparison between syndromic approach and examination of clinical nursing practiceThis is a study for assessment of a quantitative approach in pregnant women (N=104), in which findings of vaginal infection were compared. The findings were obtained by two means, flowchart of vaginal discharge, and typical examinations in the clinical nursing practice. Data were collected from January to July 2011 through interviews and gynecological examinations. The flowchart showed no efficacy to identify candidiasis and trichomoniasis. Furthermore, it showed low sensitivity (0.0%; 50%) and positive predictive value (0.0%; 3.6%) for both infections, and low specificity for trichomoniasis (46%). The flowchart was shown to be satisfactory for bacterial vaginosis, with high sensitivity (100%), negative predictive value (100%), and accuracy (74%). We conclude that use of the flowchart should be reassessed, as it was not able to identify important infections in pregnant women. A continuous effort must be directed for development of effective tests in order to prevent the spread of infection and reduce the number of unnecessary treatments.Estudio evaluativo con enfoque cuantitativo, con una muestra de 104 gestantes, cuyo objetivo fue comparar los resultados de infecciones vaginales en las gestantes, obtenidos a partir del diagrama de flujo vaginal y las pruebas presentes en la práctica clínica de enfermería. Los datos fueron recolectados por entrevista y examen ginecológico, realizados de enero a julio del 2011. El diagrama de flujo no fue eficaz en la identificación de candidiasis y tricomoniasis, presentando baja sensibilidad (0,0%; 50%) y valor predictivo positivo (0,0%; 3,6%), para las dos infecciones y baja especificidad para tricomoniasis (46%). Para vaginosis bacteriana, se mostró satisfactoria, con alta sensibilidad (100%), valor predictivo negativo (100%) y precisión (74%). Se concluye que el uso del diagrama necesita ser revisado, ya que no fue eficaz en la identificación de infecciones importantes en las gestantes. Los esfuerzos para desarrollar pruebas efectivas deben ser continuos, con el objetivo de prevenir la propagación de infecciones y reducir tratamientos innecesarios.Estudo avaliativo de abordagem quantitativa, com amostra de 104 gestantes, com o objetivo de comparar os achados de infecções vaginais em gestantes obtidos por meio do fluxograma de corrimento vaginal com exames presentes na prática clínica da Enfermagem. Os dados foram coletados por meio de entrevista e exame ginecológico realizados de janeiro a julho de 2011. O fluxograma não se mostrou eficaz na identificação de candidíase e tricomoníase, apresentou baixa sensibilidade (0,0%; 50%) e valor preditivo positivo (0,0%; 3,6%) para as duas infecções e baixa especificidade para tricomoníase (46%). Mostrou-se satisfatório para vaginose bacteriana, com alta sensibilidade (100%), valor preditivo negativo (100%) e acurácia (74%). Conclui-se que o emprego do fluxograma precisa ser reavaliado, visto que não foi eficaz em identificar infecções importantes em gestantes. Os esforços para o desenvolvimento de testes eficazes devem ser contínuos, com intuito de prevenir a disseminação de infecções e reduzir tratamentos desnecessários.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/7808710.1590/reeusp.v47i6.78087Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; v. 47 n. 6 (2013); 1265-1271Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 47 No. 6 (2013); 1265-1271Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 47 Núm. 6 (2013); 1265-12711980-220X0080-6234reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087/82151https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087/82152http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Thais MarquesTeles, Liana Mara RochaOliveira, Amanda Souza deCampos, Fernanda CamaraBarbosa, Rita de Cassia CarvalhoPinheiro, Ana Karina BezerraDamasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro2014-04-01T19:20:21Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/78087Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/oai||nursingscholar@usp.br1980-220X0080-6234opendoar:2014-04-01T19:20:21Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria
Corrimentos vaginais em gestantes: comparacao da abordagem sindromica com exames da pratica clinica da enfermagem
Vaginal discharge in pregnant women: comparison between syndromic approach and examination of clinical nursing practice
title Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria
spellingShingle Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria
Lima, Thais Marques
title_short Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria
title_full Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria
title_fullStr Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria
title_full_unstemmed Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria
title_sort Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria
author Lima, Thais Marques
author_facet Lima, Thais Marques
Teles, Liana Mara Rocha
Oliveira, Amanda Souza de
Campos, Fernanda Camara
Barbosa, Rita de Cassia Carvalho
Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra
Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro
author_role author
author2 Teles, Liana Mara Rocha
Oliveira, Amanda Souza de
Campos, Fernanda Camara
Barbosa, Rita de Cassia Carvalho
Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra
Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Thais Marques
Teles, Liana Mara Rocha
Oliveira, Amanda Souza de
Campos, Fernanda Camara
Barbosa, Rita de Cassia Carvalho
Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra
Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro
description This is a study for assessment of a quantitative approach in pregnant women (N=104), in which findings of vaginal infection were compared. The findings were obtained by two means, flowchart of vaginal discharge, and typical examinations in the clinical nursing practice. Data were collected from January to July 2011 through interviews and gynecological examinations. The flowchart showed no efficacy to identify candidiasis and trichomoniasis. Furthermore, it showed low sensitivity (0.0%; 50%) and positive predictive value (0.0%; 3.6%) for both infections, and low specificity for trichomoniasis (46%). The flowchart was shown to be satisfactory for bacterial vaginosis, with high sensitivity (100%), negative predictive value (100%), and accuracy (74%). We conclude that use of the flowchart should be reassessed, as it was not able to identify important infections in pregnant women. A continuous effort must be directed for development of effective tests in order to prevent the spread of infection and reduce the number of unnecessary treatments.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087
10.1590/reeusp.v47i6.78087
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/reeusp.v47i6.78087
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087/82151
https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087/82152
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; v. 47 n. 6 (2013); 1265-1271
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 47 No. 6 (2013); 1265-1271
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 47 Núm. 6 (2013); 1265-1271
1980-220X
0080-6234
reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
collection Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||nursingscholar@usp.br
_version_ 1800221736810053632