Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087 |
Resumo: | This is a study for assessment of a quantitative approach in pregnant women (N=104), in which findings of vaginal infection were compared. The findings were obtained by two means, flowchart of vaginal discharge, and typical examinations in the clinical nursing practice. Data were collected from January to July 2011 through interviews and gynecological examinations. The flowchart showed no efficacy to identify candidiasis and trichomoniasis. Furthermore, it showed low sensitivity (0.0%; 50%) and positive predictive value (0.0%; 3.6%) for both infections, and low specificity for trichomoniasis (46%). The flowchart was shown to be satisfactory for bacterial vaginosis, with high sensitivity (100%), negative predictive value (100%), and accuracy (74%). We conclude that use of the flowchart should be reassessed, as it was not able to identify important infections in pregnant women. A continuous effort must be directed for development of effective tests in order to prevent the spread of infection and reduce the number of unnecessary treatments. |
id |
USP-24_2044e3c6a1f59d2470fcc0d1dcad1a6d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/78087 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-24 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeriaCorrimentos vaginais em gestantes: comparacao da abordagem sindromica com exames da pratica clinica da enfermagemVaginal discharge in pregnant women: comparison between syndromic approach and examination of clinical nursing practiceThis is a study for assessment of a quantitative approach in pregnant women (N=104), in which findings of vaginal infection were compared. The findings were obtained by two means, flowchart of vaginal discharge, and typical examinations in the clinical nursing practice. Data were collected from January to July 2011 through interviews and gynecological examinations. The flowchart showed no efficacy to identify candidiasis and trichomoniasis. Furthermore, it showed low sensitivity (0.0%; 50%) and positive predictive value (0.0%; 3.6%) for both infections, and low specificity for trichomoniasis (46%). The flowchart was shown to be satisfactory for bacterial vaginosis, with high sensitivity (100%), negative predictive value (100%), and accuracy (74%). We conclude that use of the flowchart should be reassessed, as it was not able to identify important infections in pregnant women. A continuous effort must be directed for development of effective tests in order to prevent the spread of infection and reduce the number of unnecessary treatments.Estudio evaluativo con enfoque cuantitativo, con una muestra de 104 gestantes, cuyo objetivo fue comparar los resultados de infecciones vaginales en las gestantes, obtenidos a partir del diagrama de flujo vaginal y las pruebas presentes en la práctica clínica de enfermería. Los datos fueron recolectados por entrevista y examen ginecológico, realizados de enero a julio del 2011. El diagrama de flujo no fue eficaz en la identificación de candidiasis y tricomoniasis, presentando baja sensibilidad (0,0%; 50%) y valor predictivo positivo (0,0%; 3,6%), para las dos infecciones y baja especificidad para tricomoniasis (46%). Para vaginosis bacteriana, se mostró satisfactoria, con alta sensibilidad (100%), valor predictivo negativo (100%) y precisión (74%). Se concluye que el uso del diagrama necesita ser revisado, ya que no fue eficaz en la identificación de infecciones importantes en las gestantes. Los esfuerzos para desarrollar pruebas efectivas deben ser continuos, con el objetivo de prevenir la propagación de infecciones y reducir tratamientos innecesarios.Estudo avaliativo de abordagem quantitativa, com amostra de 104 gestantes, com o objetivo de comparar os achados de infecções vaginais em gestantes obtidos por meio do fluxograma de corrimento vaginal com exames presentes na prática clínica da Enfermagem. Os dados foram coletados por meio de entrevista e exame ginecológico realizados de janeiro a julho de 2011. O fluxograma não se mostrou eficaz na identificação de candidíase e tricomoníase, apresentou baixa sensibilidade (0,0%; 50%) e valor preditivo positivo (0,0%; 3,6%) para as duas infecções e baixa especificidade para tricomoníase (46%). Mostrou-se satisfatório para vaginose bacteriana, com alta sensibilidade (100%), valor preditivo negativo (100%) e acurácia (74%). Conclui-se que o emprego do fluxograma precisa ser reavaliado, visto que não foi eficaz em identificar infecções importantes em gestantes. Os esforços para o desenvolvimento de testes eficazes devem ser contínuos, com intuito de prevenir a disseminação de infecções e reduzir tratamentos desnecessários.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/7808710.1590/reeusp.v47i6.78087Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; v. 47 n. 6 (2013); 1265-1271Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 47 No. 6 (2013); 1265-1271Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 47 Núm. 6 (2013); 1265-12711980-220X0080-6234reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087/82151https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087/82152http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Thais MarquesTeles, Liana Mara RochaOliveira, Amanda Souza deCampos, Fernanda CamaraBarbosa, Rita de Cassia CarvalhoPinheiro, Ana Karina BezerraDamasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro2014-04-01T19:20:21Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/78087Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/oai||nursingscholar@usp.br1980-220X0080-6234opendoar:2014-04-01T19:20:21Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria Corrimentos vaginais em gestantes: comparacao da abordagem sindromica com exames da pratica clinica da enfermagem Vaginal discharge in pregnant women: comparison between syndromic approach and examination of clinical nursing practice |
title |
Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria |
spellingShingle |
Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria Lima, Thais Marques |
title_short |
Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria |
title_full |
Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria |
title_fullStr |
Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria |
title_full_unstemmed |
Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria |
title_sort |
Flujo vaginal en gestantes: comparacion entre el abordaje sindromico y las pruebas en la practica clinica de enfermeria |
author |
Lima, Thais Marques |
author_facet |
Lima, Thais Marques Teles, Liana Mara Rocha Oliveira, Amanda Souza de Campos, Fernanda Camara Barbosa, Rita de Cassia Carvalho Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Teles, Liana Mara Rocha Oliveira, Amanda Souza de Campos, Fernanda Camara Barbosa, Rita de Cassia Carvalho Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Thais Marques Teles, Liana Mara Rocha Oliveira, Amanda Souza de Campos, Fernanda Camara Barbosa, Rita de Cassia Carvalho Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro |
description |
This is a study for assessment of a quantitative approach in pregnant women (N=104), in which findings of vaginal infection were compared. The findings were obtained by two means, flowchart of vaginal discharge, and typical examinations in the clinical nursing practice. Data were collected from January to July 2011 through interviews and gynecological examinations. The flowchart showed no efficacy to identify candidiasis and trichomoniasis. Furthermore, it showed low sensitivity (0.0%; 50%) and positive predictive value (0.0%; 3.6%) for both infections, and low specificity for trichomoniasis (46%). The flowchart was shown to be satisfactory for bacterial vaginosis, with high sensitivity (100%), negative predictive value (100%), and accuracy (74%). We conclude that use of the flowchart should be reassessed, as it was not able to identify important infections in pregnant women. A continuous effort must be directed for development of effective tests in order to prevent the spread of infection and reduce the number of unnecessary treatments. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087 10.1590/reeusp.v47i6.78087 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/reeusp.v47i6.78087 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087/82151 https://www.revistas.usp.br/reeusp/article/view/78087/82152 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; v. 47 n. 6 (2013); 1265-1271 Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 47 No. 6 (2013); 1265-1271 Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP; Vol. 47 Núm. 6 (2013); 1265-1271 1980-220X 0080-6234 reponame:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||nursingscholar@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221736810053632 |