Governance in agribusiness organizations: challenges in the management of rural family firms

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Machado Filho,Cláudio Pinheiro
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Caleman,Silvia Morales de Queiroz, Cunha,Christiano França da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-21072017000100081
Resumo: Abstract The rural production in Brazil has experienced a significant competitive impact with the stabilization of the economy promoted by the Real Plan in 1994. Indeed, the Brazilian agriculture has achieved efficiency gains in terms of technology, economies of scale and general modernization of the activity in the field. In this context, the professional management of rural production evolved. However, the governance process does not evolve in the same dimension, and the “governance risk” is still poorly addressed in the rural environment, which often limits the potential of operations. In this study, we sought to deepen the understanding of the factors that impact the implementation of governance practices in rural properties in Brazil. Based on a convenience and non-probability sample, this study seeks to understand the evolution of the governance process on farms and its correlation with the management practices. This study found a correlation between the existence of some formal management processes (for example, strategic planning and more robust accounting systems) and advances in the governance mechanisms and processes, such as the establishment of a board of directors, clearer rules regarding the separation between corporate and family assets and more transparency in income statements. This study also found a lack of clarity in the separation of return on capital (dividend) and compensation for work (compensation for services provided) for partners, heirs and other family members. In summary, we concluded that there is the adoption of some governance mechanisms in the rural sector, but they are still poorly developed among rural producers, hence the need to stimulate them.
id USP-27_4ec4b2c34506f6b6a20923d66f87f2be
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0080-21072017000100081
network_acronym_str USP-27
network_name_str Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Governance in agribusiness organizations: challenges in the management of rural family firmsGovernanceFamily firmsRural producersAbstract The rural production in Brazil has experienced a significant competitive impact with the stabilization of the economy promoted by the Real Plan in 1994. Indeed, the Brazilian agriculture has achieved efficiency gains in terms of technology, economies of scale and general modernization of the activity in the field. In this context, the professional management of rural production evolved. However, the governance process does not evolve in the same dimension, and the “governance risk” is still poorly addressed in the rural environment, which often limits the potential of operations. In this study, we sought to deepen the understanding of the factors that impact the implementation of governance practices in rural properties in Brazil. Based on a convenience and non-probability sample, this study seeks to understand the evolution of the governance process on farms and its correlation with the management practices. This study found a correlation between the existence of some formal management processes (for example, strategic planning and more robust accounting systems) and advances in the governance mechanisms and processes, such as the establishment of a board of directors, clearer rules regarding the separation between corporate and family assets and more transparency in income statements. This study also found a lack of clarity in the separation of return on capital (dividend) and compensation for work (compensation for services provided) for partners, heirs and other family members. In summary, we concluded that there is the adoption of some governance mechanisms in the rural sector, but they are still poorly developed among rural producers, hence the need to stimulate them.Departamento de Administração da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-21072017000100081Revista de Administração (São Paulo) v.52 n.1 2017reponame:Revista de Administração (São Paulo)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1016/j.rausp.2016.09.004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMachado Filho,Cláudio PinheiroCaleman,Silvia Morales de QueirozCunha,Christiano França daeng2017-02-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0080-21072017000100081Revistahttp://rausp.usp.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprausp@usp.br||reinhard@usp.br1984-61420080-2107opendoar:2017-02-20T00:00Revista de Administração (São Paulo) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Governance in agribusiness organizations: challenges in the management of rural family firms
title Governance in agribusiness organizations: challenges in the management of rural family firms
spellingShingle Governance in agribusiness organizations: challenges in the management of rural family firms
Machado Filho,Cláudio Pinheiro
Governance
Family firms
Rural producers
title_short Governance in agribusiness organizations: challenges in the management of rural family firms
title_full Governance in agribusiness organizations: challenges in the management of rural family firms
title_fullStr Governance in agribusiness organizations: challenges in the management of rural family firms
title_full_unstemmed Governance in agribusiness organizations: challenges in the management of rural family firms
title_sort Governance in agribusiness organizations: challenges in the management of rural family firms
author Machado Filho,Cláudio Pinheiro
author_facet Machado Filho,Cláudio Pinheiro
Caleman,Silvia Morales de Queiroz
Cunha,Christiano França da
author_role author
author2 Caleman,Silvia Morales de Queiroz
Cunha,Christiano França da
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Machado Filho,Cláudio Pinheiro
Caleman,Silvia Morales de Queiroz
Cunha,Christiano França da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Governance
Family firms
Rural producers
topic Governance
Family firms
Rural producers
description Abstract The rural production in Brazil has experienced a significant competitive impact with the stabilization of the economy promoted by the Real Plan in 1994. Indeed, the Brazilian agriculture has achieved efficiency gains in terms of technology, economies of scale and general modernization of the activity in the field. In this context, the professional management of rural production evolved. However, the governance process does not evolve in the same dimension, and the “governance risk” is still poorly addressed in the rural environment, which often limits the potential of operations. In this study, we sought to deepen the understanding of the factors that impact the implementation of governance practices in rural properties in Brazil. Based on a convenience and non-probability sample, this study seeks to understand the evolution of the governance process on farms and its correlation with the management practices. This study found a correlation between the existence of some formal management processes (for example, strategic planning and more robust accounting systems) and advances in the governance mechanisms and processes, such as the establishment of a board of directors, clearer rules regarding the separation between corporate and family assets and more transparency in income statements. This study also found a lack of clarity in the separation of return on capital (dividend) and compensation for work (compensation for services provided) for partners, heirs and other family members. In summary, we concluded that there is the adoption of some governance mechanisms in the rural sector, but they are still poorly developed among rural producers, hence the need to stimulate them.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-21072017000100081
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-21072017000100081
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rausp.2016.09.004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Administração da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Administração da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração (São Paulo) v.52 n.1 2017
reponame:Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
collection Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração (São Paulo) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rausp@usp.br||reinhard@usp.br
_version_ 1748936717249806336