Effect of some additives on the quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum) silage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Melotti, Laércio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/6308
Resumo: Twenty aditives were been used on ensiling Elephantgrass (80 days growing period): without additives (T1); 0.5% urea (T2); 10% cotton fiber (T3); 10% Elephantgrass hay (T4); 10% Guandu hay (T5); drying for 6 hours (T6); 2% suggar wastes (T7); 2% corn meal (T8); 4% corn meal (T9); 6% corn meal (T10); 2% corn meal and 0.5% urea (T11); 4% corn meal and 0.5% urea (T12); 6% corn meal and 0.5% urea (T13); 1% dried molasses (T14); 2% dried molases (T15); 3% dried molasses (T16); 1% dried molasses and 0.5% urea (T17); 2% dried molasses and 0.5% urea (T18); 3% dried molasses and 0.5% urea (T19); bacterial inoculant Biosilo (T20). pH was increased in T1 (5.36) and T5 (5.33). The other silages pH varied from 3.89 to 4.29 and were similar. The highest non protein nitrogen was observed in T3 and those which included urea, but this was not observed whem 3% of molasses was included. Most silage fermentations were towards lactic acid production and these results were similar. T2 and T3 showed higher butiric acid concentration than the others and T2 and T9 showed higher acetic acid production. In vitro dry matter digestibility coeficients were from 26.36 to 51.31%. Dry matter loss was higher on T2 (11.08%), T3 (10.50%) and T4 (9.8%).
id USP-49_a4b59f4d90985f7a34cd0580398a5485
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/6308
network_acronym_str USP-49
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
repository_id_str https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/index
spelling Effect of some additives on the quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum) silageEfeito de alguns tratamentos sobre a qualidade da silagem de capim-elefante cultivar Napier (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum)SilagemFermentaçãoDigestibilidadeAditivosSilageFermentationDigestibilyAdditivesTwenty aditives were been used on ensiling Elephantgrass (80 days growing period): without additives (T1); 0.5% urea (T2); 10% cotton fiber (T3); 10% Elephantgrass hay (T4); 10% Guandu hay (T5); drying for 6 hours (T6); 2% suggar wastes (T7); 2% corn meal (T8); 4% corn meal (T9); 6% corn meal (T10); 2% corn meal and 0.5% urea (T11); 4% corn meal and 0.5% urea (T12); 6% corn meal and 0.5% urea (T13); 1% dried molasses (T14); 2% dried molases (T15); 3% dried molasses (T16); 1% dried molasses and 0.5% urea (T17); 2% dried molasses and 0.5% urea (T18); 3% dried molasses and 0.5% urea (T19); bacterial inoculant Biosilo (T20). pH was increased in T1 (5.36) and T5 (5.33). The other silages pH varied from 3.89 to 4.29 and were similar. The highest non protein nitrogen was observed in T3 and those which included urea, but this was not observed whem 3% of molasses was included. Most silage fermentations were towards lactic acid production and these results were similar. T2 and T3 showed higher butiric acid concentration than the others and T2 and T9 showed higher acetic acid production. In vitro dry matter digestibility coeficients were from 26.36 to 51.31%. Dry matter loss was higher on T2 (11.08%), T3 (10.50%) and T4 (9.8%).Vinte aditivos* foram utilizados na ensilagem de capim-elefante (80 dias de crescimento), em silos de laboratório: sem aditivos (T1); 0,5% de uréia (T2); 10% de fibra de algodão (T3); 10% de feno de Capim Elefante (T4); 10% de feno de Guandu (T5); emurchecimento por 6 horas (T6); 2% de resíduo de varredura de usina de açúcar (T7); 2% de fubá de milho (T8); 4% de fubá de milho (T9); 6% de fubá de milho (T10); 2% de fubá de milho e 0,5% de uréia (T11); 4% de fubá de milho e 0,5% de uréia (T12); 6% de fubá de milho e 0,5% de uréia (T13); 1% de melaço em pó (T14); 2% de melaço em pó (T15); 3% de melaço em pó (T16); 1% de melaço em pó e 0,5% de uréia (T17); 2% de melaço em pó e 0,5% de uréia (T18); 3% de melaço em pó e 0,5% de uréia (T19); inoculante bacteriano denominado Biosilo (T20). O pH foi maior nos tratamentos T1 (5,36) e T5 (5,33), sendo que nos demais este índice variou de 4,29 a 3,89, sendo estatisticamente semelhantes entre si, podendo ser considerados como dentro da faixa ideal. Os maiores teores de nitrogênio amoniacal foram obtidos nos tratamentos compostos de uréia e em T3. Em comparação ao uso isolado da uréia, a inclusão de 3% de melaço junto a este reduziu a produção de nitrogênio amoniacal e o valor obtido foi semelhante aos demais tratamentos. De maneira geral, as silagens se mostraram predominantemente láticas e a concentração de ácido lático foi semelhante entre os diversos tratamentos. T2 e T3 apresentaram maior produção de ácido butírico e T2 e T9 maiores teores de ácido acético. Os coeficientes de DIVMS variaram de 26,36 a 51,31% e as perdas de MS foram superiores em T2 (11,08%), T3 (10,50%) e T4 (9,80%) e semelhante nos demais.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia2004-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/630810.1590/S1413-95962004000600009Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 41 Núm. 6 (2004); 409-415 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 41 No. 6 (2004); 409-415 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; v. 41 n. 6 (2004); 409-415 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; V. 41 N. 6 (2004); 409-415 1678-44561413-9596reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Scienceinstname:Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/6308/7839Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares deMelotti, Laércioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-06-23T04:20:51Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/6308Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvrasPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/oaibjvras@usp.br1413-95961413-9596opendoar:https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/index2023-01-12T16:42:36.819192Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of some additives on the quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum) silage
Efeito de alguns tratamentos sobre a qualidade da silagem de capim-elefante cultivar Napier (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum)
title Effect of some additives on the quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum) silage
spellingShingle Effect of some additives on the quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum) silage
Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de
Silagem
Fermentação
Digestibilidade
Aditivos
Silage
Fermentation
Digestibily
Additives
title_short Effect of some additives on the quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum) silage
title_full Effect of some additives on the quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum) silage
title_fullStr Effect of some additives on the quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum) silage
title_full_unstemmed Effect of some additives on the quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum) silage
title_sort Effect of some additives on the quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum) silage
author Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de
author_facet Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de
Melotti, Laércio
author_role author
author2 Melotti, Laércio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de
Melotti, Laércio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Silagem
Fermentação
Digestibilidade
Aditivos
Silage
Fermentation
Digestibily
Additives
topic Silagem
Fermentação
Digestibilidade
Aditivos
Silage
Fermentation
Digestibily
Additives
description Twenty aditives were been used on ensiling Elephantgrass (80 days growing period): without additives (T1); 0.5% urea (T2); 10% cotton fiber (T3); 10% Elephantgrass hay (T4); 10% Guandu hay (T5); drying for 6 hours (T6); 2% suggar wastes (T7); 2% corn meal (T8); 4% corn meal (T9); 6% corn meal (T10); 2% corn meal and 0.5% urea (T11); 4% corn meal and 0.5% urea (T12); 6% corn meal and 0.5% urea (T13); 1% dried molasses (T14); 2% dried molases (T15); 3% dried molasses (T16); 1% dried molasses and 0.5% urea (T17); 2% dried molasses and 0.5% urea (T18); 3% dried molasses and 0.5% urea (T19); bacterial inoculant Biosilo (T20). pH was increased in T1 (5.36) and T5 (5.33). The other silages pH varied from 3.89 to 4.29 and were similar. The highest non protein nitrogen was observed in T3 and those which included urea, but this was not observed whem 3% of molasses was included. Most silage fermentations were towards lactic acid production and these results were similar. T2 and T3 showed higher butiric acid concentration than the others and T2 and T9 showed higher acetic acid production. In vitro dry matter digestibility coeficients were from 26.36 to 51.31%. Dry matter loss was higher on T2 (11.08%), T3 (10.50%) and T4 (9.8%).
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/6308
10.1590/S1413-95962004000600009
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/6308
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1413-95962004000600009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/6308/7839
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 41 Núm. 6 (2004); 409-415
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; Vol. 41 No. 6 (2004); 409-415
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; v. 41 n. 6 (2004); 409-415
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science; V. 41 N. 6 (2004); 409-415
1678-4456
1413-9596
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
instname:Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
collection Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjvras@usp.br
_version_ 1797051556419338240