Comparison of measured respiratory muscle strength values to those of different predictive equations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leal, Altina Hissnauer
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Hamasaki, Tatiana Akemi, Jamami, Maurício, Di Lorenzo, Valéria Amorim Pires, Pessoa, Bruna Varanda
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/76090
Resumo: The aim of this study was to compare maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure values (MIP and MEP) obtained through different predictive equations to those directly measured from sedentary, healthy adults. Subjects were 495 both-sex inhabitants of the city of São Carlos (SP) and region. Respiratory pressures were measured with subjects standing up, using a hand vacuometer with circular mouthpiece and nasal clip. Measures taken were grouped according to subjects’ age in five 10-year age-groups. The obtained values were compared to predicted values by equations proposed by Harik-Khan et al (1998), Neder et al (1999), and Black & Hyatt (1969), by using Friedman Anova test and Dunn post-hoc (p<0.05). Comparison results showed that predicted values usually overestimate those directly measured, except Harik-Khan et al equation for male MIP, and Neder et al’s for both sexes MEP. Hence the equations most suitable for this study sample are those of Harik-Khan et al for MIP, and of Neder et al for MEP.
id USP-9_6425c1d2f0bf384fb6eafdb3779e6d9e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/76090
network_acronym_str USP-9
network_name_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of measured respiratory muscle strength values to those of different predictive equationsComparação entre valores de força muscular respiratória medidos e previstos por diferentes equaçõesavaliaçãotestes de função respiratóriavalores de referência.evaluationreference valuesrespiratory function tests.The aim of this study was to compare maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure values (MIP and MEP) obtained through different predictive equations to those directly measured from sedentary, healthy adults. Subjects were 495 both-sex inhabitants of the city of São Carlos (SP) and region. Respiratory pressures were measured with subjects standing up, using a hand vacuometer with circular mouthpiece and nasal clip. Measures taken were grouped according to subjects’ age in five 10-year age-groups. The obtained values were compared to predicted values by equations proposed by Harik-Khan et al (1998), Neder et al (1999), and Black & Hyatt (1969), by using Friedman Anova test and Dunn post-hoc (p<0.05). Comparison results showed that predicted values usually overestimate those directly measured, except Harik-Khan et al equation for male MIP, and Neder et al’s for both sexes MEP. Hence the equations most suitable for this study sample are those of Harik-Khan et al for MIP, and of Neder et al for MEP.Este estudo teve como objetivo comparar os valores das pressões inspiratória e expiratória máximas (PImáx e PEmáx) estimados por meio de diferentes equações preditivas com aqueles obtidos diretamente pormanovacuometria. Foram avaliados 495 adultos sedentários saudáveis de ambos os sexos, moradores de São Carlos (SP) e região. As pressões respiratórias foram mensuradas com o indivíduo em posição ortostática, utilizando-se um manovacuômetro analógico com bocal circular e uso de clipe nasal. Os valores obtidos foram agrupados segunda a idade dos sujeitos, em faixas com intervalo de dez anos. Em cada faixa etária, os valores foram comparados com os previstos pelas equações elaboradas por Harik-Khan et al. (1998), Neder et al. (1999) e Black & Hyatt (1969), usando-se o teste de Friedman Anova e post-hoc de Dunn (p<0,05). Observou-se, de modo geral, que os valores previstos pelas equaçõessuperestimam aqueles obtidos de forma direta, com exceção das equações de Harik-Khan et al. para a PImáx no sexo masculino, e a de Neder et al. para a PEmáx em ambos os sexos. Conclui-se que as equações mais adequadas para a população deste estudo são as de Harik-Khan et al. para PImáx e Neder et al. para PEmáx.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina2007-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/7609010.1590/fpusp.v14i3.76090Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2007); 25-30Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 14 Núm. 3 (2007); 25-30Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 14 n. 3 (2007); 25-302316-91171809-2950reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/76090/79842Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeal, Altina HissnauerHamasaki, Tatiana AkemiJamami, MaurícioDi Lorenzo, Valéria Amorim PiresPessoa, Bruna Varanda2014-05-07T22:36:07Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/76090Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/fpuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/oai||revfisio@usp.br2316-91171809-2950opendoar:2014-05-07T22:36:07Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of measured respiratory muscle strength values to those of different predictive equations
Comparação entre valores de força muscular respiratória medidos e previstos por diferentes equações
title Comparison of measured respiratory muscle strength values to those of different predictive equations
spellingShingle Comparison of measured respiratory muscle strength values to those of different predictive equations
Leal, Altina Hissnauer
avaliação
testes de função respiratória
valores de referência.
evaluation
reference values
respiratory function tests.
title_short Comparison of measured respiratory muscle strength values to those of different predictive equations
title_full Comparison of measured respiratory muscle strength values to those of different predictive equations
title_fullStr Comparison of measured respiratory muscle strength values to those of different predictive equations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of measured respiratory muscle strength values to those of different predictive equations
title_sort Comparison of measured respiratory muscle strength values to those of different predictive equations
author Leal, Altina Hissnauer
author_facet Leal, Altina Hissnauer
Hamasaki, Tatiana Akemi
Jamami, Maurício
Di Lorenzo, Valéria Amorim Pires
Pessoa, Bruna Varanda
author_role author
author2 Hamasaki, Tatiana Akemi
Jamami, Maurício
Di Lorenzo, Valéria Amorim Pires
Pessoa, Bruna Varanda
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leal, Altina Hissnauer
Hamasaki, Tatiana Akemi
Jamami, Maurício
Di Lorenzo, Valéria Amorim Pires
Pessoa, Bruna Varanda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv avaliação
testes de função respiratória
valores de referência.
evaluation
reference values
respiratory function tests.
topic avaliação
testes de função respiratória
valores de referência.
evaluation
reference values
respiratory function tests.
description The aim of this study was to compare maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure values (MIP and MEP) obtained through different predictive equations to those directly measured from sedentary, healthy adults. Subjects were 495 both-sex inhabitants of the city of São Carlos (SP) and region. Respiratory pressures were measured with subjects standing up, using a hand vacuometer with circular mouthpiece and nasal clip. Measures taken were grouped according to subjects’ age in five 10-year age-groups. The obtained values were compared to predicted values by equations proposed by Harik-Khan et al (1998), Neder et al (1999), and Black & Hyatt (1969), by using Friedman Anova test and Dunn post-hoc (p<0.05). Comparison results showed that predicted values usually overestimate those directly measured, except Harik-Khan et al equation for male MIP, and Neder et al’s for both sexes MEP. Hence the equations most suitable for this study sample are those of Harik-Khan et al for MIP, and of Neder et al for MEP.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/76090
10.1590/fpusp.v14i3.76090
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/76090
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/fpusp.v14i3.76090
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/76090/79842
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2007); 25-30
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 14 Núm. 3 (2007); 25-30
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 14 n. 3 (2007); 25-30
2316-9117
1809-2950
reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
collection Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revfisio@usp.br
_version_ 1787713734961004544

Registros relacionados